What was the point of the Mosque attack? This doesn't make any sense

Remember anons;
Report D&C threads.
Sage D&C threads.
Filter D&C threads.

Remember anons;
Report slide threads.
Sage slide threads.
Filter slide threads.

Remember anons;
Report duplicate threads.
Sage duplicate threads.
Filter duplicate threads.

Doubt that he is dumb, probably more intellectually apathetic. Look at the manifesto, regardless of the effect it ultimately has it'll be a success.

There are essentially a few choices for how the aftermath goes down:

Divide people?
Already done, this in no way changes how the people in power look at us anyway. The more repressive they get, the more WN types pop up. They show their hand.

Unity?
Shows conservatives that their own party hates them. Necessarily has to exclude people like him, greater social distance creates further radicalization which then causes another Tarrant resetting the first question of how to deal with people like him.

Provokes a response?
A new Tarrant shows up to respond.

Also, look at the manifesto. Milquetoast conservatives are denounced and he cites China as an inspiration. Every direction he goes toward directs the left in a circle. He knows the right will be blamed anyway.

Attached: kkkallday.jpeg (640x588, 93.46K)

...

I'm sure he could've solved all that. Good job, user. Brilliant stuff.

It's true that one should kill traitors before enemies but Breivik was Chapter 1. Brenton is Chapter 2.

well written please…if you cannot reason from first principle fundamentals you are pretty dumb. I don’t like religion Islam in particular but killing some innocent Muslims as revenge is a false equivalence…he was a dumbshit who couldn’t think for himself no better than those that believe in the quran

I mean he's doing something right if I'm reading it. I rarely read these things. Fascinating killer tbh. He liked Dylan roof though which makes me think he's kind of dumb.

Is the size of a field determined by its width or its length? Of course the facts matter when it comes to what the media can report. The internet's not completely censored yet, which will limit how much they can get away with lying.


It because I don't know exactly what would be best so I was being vague.

he is saying that people who hate you will hate you regardless of your stance on terrorism, so there is no point trying to say "we are against terrorism" because it wont affect anything. People will just see through it immediately as an attempt to garner sympathy, which, seeing as they dislike the ideology anyway, will just seem both funny and slimy at the same time.

The real question: What part of him was more full of pride? The son of the west who slaughtered the Semite invaders, or the Kiwi shitposter who cast the state of this board into an illegible garbage fire by his actions?

Attached: The mad lads of baraboo 1.jpg (156x177, 12.34K)