There seems to be a big wedge (potentially a D&C vector) between anons who believe accelerationism is good/bad for us. This is an incorrect line of thinking, since our opinion is moot - if all it takes is one madman to shoot up a mosque and then the entirely of NZ gets a gun grab, then really our opinion on the affair is irrelevant.
The real discussion we must have, is what should we do with the situation. Memetics matter, and the opinion of the public can be shifted ever so slightly by our own. Again, the actions of any individual are not only out of our control, but could easily be a false flag (regardless of if it was or not now, because the end result is the same).
There is way too much discussion about what Zig Forums thinks of the situation, if he was /ourguy/ or not, all of this is entirely irrelevant. "What Zig Forums thinks" is an open shill vector, and unproductive at best. You form your own opinion. What matters as a "group", if you consider Zig Forums to be one, is where do we go from here. Informed guesses as to what will happen next, evaluations of the impact the event had, digging and presentation of proofs by any concerned anons, and in general, focusing on the facts of the matter, not this gay discussion of "he's a hero!" vs "he's a retard!" and so forth. What is done is done, and he sure won't be doing anything else for "a few" years, so the meta-politics and the factual reality matter way more and should be the focus.
Most everyone on this board should already know that the collapse is inevitable. Hell, a lot of normies even know that. In light of demographic trends, the course of action is obvious. Shill for Yang and use the $1000/month as a boogaloo prep fund.
John Flores
Accelerationism = bad. >Drops her magazines because she's a ditz Not sure how I feel about Rule 63, but that's cute.
Elijah Walker
What Brenton was accelerationist, yes, but it wasn't what accelerationism is ALL about. Accelerationism is doing what Trump won't: bringing into focus the invasive threats of multiculturalism. It's obviating what Jews stand for, and what they do. It's redpilling the masses, and bringing the deeper truths to the fore.
For Brenton, though, he took the easy route: shooting up a mosque. It did make a point though, didn't it?
Elijah Thompson
What is the 'hard route' IYO?
Ryder Kelly
It made a point and that point was further demonizing the struggle against white genocide and getting guns b&.
Accelerationism is not about domestic terrorism but mass public awakening. Shills say that Brenton Tarrant will spark a great white uprising but did that happen with Dylan Roof? No, neither will it happen due to Brenton. Instead, stricter gun control laws will be enforced, just like they were thanks to Dylan Roof. These "people" claiming Accelerationism is about violence are Jews and Bolsheviks who do not have white people's best interests in mind. Am I saying to not fight back? Not at all. I am saying to be intelligent and consider the consequences of your actions.
Henry Nelson
My sides. Right or wrong, NYT admits we’re winning and they can’t stop our use of their social media platforms against them.
patience and preparation Normies are waking up, however slowly. When they do wake up, many of them will think the exact opposite of what they think now. Try to maintain a semblance of common-sense, user. People who are new to the redpill often go too far. for all I know, that may have been what happened with Brenton.
