Expanding on Accelerationism (critical reading)

This is a critical expansion on the Philosophical intro to Accelerationism post:

This will attempt to answer the criticism which basically boils down to this:


Expansion

Accelerationism itself deals with an absolute horizon – one that is closing in on us. This horizon itself is hyperstitional in nature. Before we go further, we must explain hyperstition.

Hyperstition is a positive cybernetic circuit that features general culture as a component. Essentially, it can be defined as the occult science of self-fulfilling prophecies. Hyperstitions function causally in the human socio-cultural matrix to bring about their own existence. An example is the Trump election, where the very idea of Trump becoming president brought about his presidency. Even better – the example of the Cyberspace, whose very existence eventually turned it into a technosocial reality. If you understand meme magic, then this is its engine by which it operates. It's an epistemic reality.

Moving on, Accelerationism is not to be thought of as accelerating the growth of evil, because it's not. It's hyperstitional acceleration, an acceleration towards that which is coming to meet us from the future. There's no option to negate it for it is already so. This would be otherwise if it wasn't for the fact the prophecy is already in the process of fulfilment and the engines are working overtime to see its realization. The forces are too great to stop it and one would simply be overwhelmed if they tried. The only way forward is to go through, which means further in. And the deeper we go, the greater the net entropy becomes which only benefits us more.

If we are to win, then we must realise the absolute reality of Accelerationism. It isn't a choice and any attempts to negate it only result in a net loss of our potentiality because reality is already happening and attempts to prolong the inevitable only ever makes situations worse. That's common wisdom we should all know. Therefore, let there not be any more discussion on whether it is good or bad. Let's focus our attention on what truly matters: the inevitable hurtling towards us from the future.

Will you have time to react?

(INB4 the brainlets start getting confused again.)

Attached: Accelerationism.png (780x439, 617.07K)

Other urls found in this thread:

newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2016/08/what-accelerationism
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Attached: Accelerate.jpg (1658x2560 35.05 KB, 461.44K)

You are a dumb nigger.

lol, do you anti-accelerationism shills ever have anything other than the text equivalent of dribbling?

Oh god I really don't wanna go down this rabbit hole, I know where it will lead me.

Attached: images2Q3XUMUZ.jpg (267x189, 27.47K)

Accelerationism works. Little sparks start big fires. WWI was a good example. Possibly the burning of the Reichstag. You could also trace back the french revolution and russian revolution to shit-shows that happened in their countries.

We are all heading to a leftist hellhole future anyway. Seems to me our only choices are to get there slow and accept it, or get there fast and use that energy to make change.

Implying you even have a choice. Don't deny reality, user.

See:

When the system sees white people as the enemy, white people will see the system as their enemy. Its that simple.

I don't think that we are following accelerationism. Specifically referencing , who posted definitions and explorations of the traditional meaning.

Accelerationism in our context doesn't refer to rapid expansion of the capitalist system to bring down the system through its self-destructive nature, but rather through the acceleration of (((multiculturalism)))

Thus, we should focus on identifying what aspects of modern society (((they))) try to decelerate, for example the Great Replacement, and incorporate that into our own, new, definition of accelerationism

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (255x255, 132.28K)