Every fucking thread ends up devolving into those for acceleration and those against it. So here's the rules for a debate in this thread:
List your arguments/points FOR or AGAINST acceleration. If someone's arguments/points are flawed, counter them with logical arguments not shitposting.
We need to hash this shit out.
There is no debate. See the proof for it in this thread:
Obviously we need both. See:
Mainstream push platform and make demands within system.
Accelerators generation pressure.
Without mainstream accelerators aren't effective because platform goes nowhere. There's no one to negotiate with since terrorists don't get a seat. Without accelerationists there's no pressure to concede to their demands.
Accelerationists must publicly demand same things as mainstream but denounce mainstream for being soft.
Mainstream must publicly demand same things as accelerationists but denounce accelerationists for being criminal.
They both work to same end. Both are needed.
Accelfags are glowniggers trying to take us down
how does ACCELERATION work for those of us without guns
You join the principled mainstream party that denounces violence. See
Buy some rope and neck yourself.
I'm FOR acceleration, I've been ready for a long time, but I wanted to make a thread for people to list their reasons for/against
Theres no debate. Voting has proved absolutely useless. It doesn't matter who you vote for, things ALWAYS move left. This is by design. The only difference is how fast they move left. Those in control know that if they move too fast, their plans wont work. The only way to have any kind of change is to make things bad enough quick enough to upset the normal faggots and reset the system.
THERE IS NO POLITICAL SOLUTION
A C C E L E R A T E
Steal guns.