Ya'know, Technically this was not a terrorist action

Yes, technically Brenton Tarrant is not a terrorist, but a uniformed Partisan Resistance Fighter.

As we know, Wikipedia is the mouthpiece of the Regime. Let's see what it has to say about being a Partisan?
>"A partisan is an armed fighter, who is not part of the regular troops of a country or state. The term comes from Italian, where it meant member of a political party. There is no separate legal status for partisans in international law. The law of war uses four criteria to legally define someone as a prisoner of war, if the person is captured:
simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partisan

Okay, so Brenton Tarrant stated quite clearly that he is resisting a foreign occupation of his nation by invaders. And a mosque is a base of operations for Muslims to take over infidel nations. They believe this.
Ah, but Tarrant is not a member of an organization.
True, but he does assume liability for his actions. He is essentially a one man army. And he is his own commander.
If anyone wants to argue that one man does not an organization make, one could simply respond by stating that Brenton Tarrant identifies as an organization. And if men can identify as women, dragons, and attack helicopters, it's more than reasonable to argue that he is an organization of one. And as stated before, he assumes liability for his actions.

Did he wear militaria insignia clearly visible?
Yes. Pic related. That is the military insignia of Europe waging war against invasion and occupation.

Did he carry his weapons openly? Absolutely. In fact, he made no effort whatsoever to hide his weapons.

Did he adhere to the "customs and laws of war" though?
Surely in killing those unarmed civilians, he demonstrates that he was not a Partisan Fighter but a terrorist, after all, we know that ONLY terrorists would kill unarmed civilians, right?
Well, for one thing, we could point out the fact that the US military regularly slaughters thousands of Muslim civilians. And the Zionist occupation force in Palestine regularly slaughters civilians. But if there is one thing I know from watching CNN, it's that Gnat-sees are bad and anyone who resisted the ebil gnat-sees was a Partisan freedom fighter resistance hashtag.

So during that righteous Partisan war of resistance, did the Poles, Jews, and Serbs conduct attacks against unarmed civilians that served enemy interests?
Yes. Many times in fact.

In April 1943, a horrendous ethnic displacement of Polish civilians was conducted by Ukrainian Paramilitary groups. In retaliation,
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacres_of_Poles_in_Volhynia_and_Eastern_Galicia#Self-defence_organizations
Were the Polish anti-Nazi Resistance fighters terrorists now because they killed unarmed civilians?

What about the assassination of unarmed pro-German civilian collaborators?
Or the slaying of unarmed German Settlers "invading" Poland at the time?
Terrorism or Partisan action? Make up your mind, antifa. Make up your mind.

How about this
>"The Bielski fighters (a jewish "Partisan" organization during the war) often joined with Soviet partisans in operations against German guards and facilities, killing many Germans and Belorussian collaborators."
That means "civilians suspected of supporting the National Socialist War Effort"
archive.fo/ZZEXB#selection-6767.367-6764.2
Well? Make up your mind, jews. Is it okay to kill civilians during a war or isn't it?

Attached: BRJCWCCHAAI6TFFL2LO2HQG7KI-618x464.jpg (618x464, 45.58K)

Other urls found in this thread:

theburningplatform.com/2019/03/20/was-brenton-tarrant-a-partisan-or-a-terrorist/
cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm
nationalisti.ro/escalation-isis-calls-followers-to-take-revenge-for-mosque-shooting/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

And most of the time, Polish, Serb, and especially jewish resistance did not even bother to wear uniforms or display their weapons openly. Will the people decrying Brenton Tarrant really go so far as to renounce the precious jewish partisans just to smear a White man? They behaved far more like terrorists than Brenton Tarrant did. he displayed his insignia openly and openly carried weapons.
And what about the mass slaughter of unarmed German civilians after the war by the Soviets? Was that terrorism or was it Partisan action? Make up your mind!

Other examples of "Partisans" who engage in civilian killing;
The Zimbabwean slaughter of Rhodesians who they regarded as invaders.
The black communist slaughter of Boer and Anglo civilians who they regarded as invaders.
The slaughter of Portuguese and Belgian and French civilians during the African wars of "liberation from dey White invada's"
Make up your mind, liberals. If killing people who you regard as invaders is terrorism, then all those wonderful black communist organizations they have been supporting for the past 5 decades were terrorists. And if it is okay to assassinate "unarmed" invaders in the name of resisting invasion, then Brenton Tarrant is not a terrorist, but a Resistance Fighter. A Partisan.

TLDR; Say, "Terrorist? Nonsense! I identify as a Partisan, you bigot! It's 2019, for crying out loud. Your backwards notions do not define my military status!"

Here is a great article on the subject that inspired me.
theburningplatform.com/2019/03/20/was-brenton-tarrant-a-partisan-or-a-terrorist/

Attached: Response to Genocide.png (1080x439, 364.44K)

Brenton Tarrant is a hero!!

nah, he was a terrorist

he an-heroed for the chan, too

New Zealand isn't Australia, (((faggot)))

New Zealand is part of the extended European homeland, nigger.
Also, it's basically part of Australia.

Don't move the goalposts, rabbi

...

Hero!

Attached: bt.jpg (800x510, 67.3K)

yes terrorsim but he killed for Serbians. Serbians are not whites as they are not protestan.

He pretends that moving from Australia to NZ is akin to moving from Austria to Bavaria. Maybe it's actually an apt analogy since neither Bavaria & Austria nor Australia & NZ are identical.

It's a lot closer to attacking Iraq and Afghanistan because jews attacked WTC

This conversation is illegal in Communist United Nations.
This conversation is also illegal in Communist USSA.

Attached: cubism-1.jpg (833x1000, 293.77K)

The customs and laws of war are currently not to target unarmed non-combatants. Also he's not actually aligned with a country or state for example there are no governments that actually back his actions. So no not actually a partisan.

Does this afford him any benefits in terms of his trial? We Zig Forums legal team now?

Op legit retarded itt that’s hilarious tho that u think he qualifies as partisan even in the spergiest of drool dreams

Long shift, Schlomo? Not enough sleep? Getting confused?

Sure
We got lawfags and shit
Also this man is an Armed Uniformed Partisan Combatant technically. He is not a terrorist

op isn’t wrong this time homo

A lot of butthurt itt. You're over the target OP.

They won't accept him as a partisan despite his claims because of the two reasons I mentioned. You have to be part of a conflict involving a government, you need to have the governments backing or acceptance and you also need to follow the conventions of war which are currently not to deliberately target unarmed non-combatants.

8ch isn’t a soveirgn nation. There’s no occupation. Not in your head. Not in your briefs (except for the poo stains). Nowhere.

You are one dumb nigger.

One man's terrorists are another man's freedom fighters. It all depends what side you take. The word "terrorist" is just a buzzword and insult.

...

but what about the glorious nation of Kekistan lel

Everyone here is a partisan against basic hygiene and usefulness.

Wasn't this written by Anglin?

HELP ME HELP ME

Attached: 75915ac0b2b0cdf8a48d15b8bbf8d1547385cc8e5d1617c7cd20296940a4b8c8.jpg (1306x747, 193.05K)

Oy vey, just cut it off already

Muh losers

It has a to be a recognized government. ISIS soldiers wear uniforms and have a flag, they are still referred to as terrorists, not partisans.

cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm
You should read this.

Escalation: ISIS Calls Followers to Take “Revenge” for Mosque Shooting

nationalisti.ro/escalation-isis-calls-followers-to-take-revenge-for-mosque-shooting/

Attached: escx.jpg (261x223, 15.72K)

How will we know it's revenge though?
Since they already aim to kill white people constantly

YES! I LOVE FURTHER ISRAEL INVOLVEMENT FROM (((ISIS))) VROOM VROOM I LOVE THEODORE HERZL NOW

Those Zimbabwean communists that slaughtered White Christians in the 70s and 80s were not representing a recognized government either.

while he could not argue against all of those, he could answer a few right off the bat without any research:


While no government will publicly back him, Tarrant could argue that the Muslims are paramilitary fighters for the NZ globohomo government if the mosque in particular or even the Islamic community in general received funding and support from the government


If you can determine that your opponent is not a uniformed combatant and not following the laws of war, they are not under the protection of all the laws. Also, if he can argue that 4th gen warfare is as much about populations and demographics, the mosque wasn't "unarmed" as the population themselves is a weapon.

Yeah, check out the comments. They didn't provide the source cuz neon-nazis

Attached: Israel-Seal.jpg (299x301, 33.64K)

(checked)
If Anglin wrote the article I cited, I'll give him credit where it is due. However, I first noticed this on The Burning Platform

Semantics. Even assuming he was doing a terrorism, such attacks are completely legitimate 4th gen warfare in Minecraft.

HAHAHA this is an (((Anglin))) copy paste? oy vey

Rolling for civil war.

Of course not, this wasn't about terror, it was about Retribution.

See attached. He was actually defebding his homeland from a foreign military invasion

Attached: 20190315_121446.jpg (4032x1960, 4.51M)

So does this mean if someone comes out and says they are the leader of Zig Forums he gets POW treatment?
Is it time for me or someone to make an onanimoose style video taking credit for the attack?

Serbian women are the only 10/10 in all of Europe, only followed by some Germanic, N

Bamp for Justice.
SIEG HEIL

Attached: 9e09fe117057206bc8537ca368122492b4745e57736e52b69208019b0cc19cf5.jpg (994x1042 84 KB, 293.9K)

1. Those people were guests invited in by the state.
2. Only the state has the authority to declare and wage war.

It was terrorism, plain and simple.

Never understood why people claim Anglin is (((Anglin))). He calls out the chosen people when they advocate for anti-white narratives. He has literally always shilled against violence while giving a home to a spectrum of the dissident right while attracting normalfags. Could you please expound, user?

DID THEY JUST ASSUME BRENTON'S MILITARY STATUS !?!?!?
He is. His government (NZ) is at war with their people. Same for EU, US, and AU.
No you don't. Only of the winning party, which may not yet even be a gvt. See crimes listed in OP.
You should look at what these counties and the UN defines as a "combatant". What is 16yrold alawaki misspelled for reasons ? What are all those Palestinian children gore pics ? What is shooting people holding flowers ?

This faggot most likely is jew++ but he is not terrorist unless he is, as every person in, or in support of, Isnotreal are terrorists, by legal definition:
Terrorist
1. One who spreads their beliefs through physical force (violence).
modern law enforcement are terrorists by this definition

Wait……

Burgers did the same thing in Kuwait…..
Burgers did the same thing in Irag………..
Burgers did the same thing in Afghanisdan…..

are you saying………………


tarrant is a US marine?

lurk 2 years

Is the people you faggot. The will of the people will not be ignored.

Hail victory.

>(((Yes, technically Brenton Tarrant is not a terrorist, but a uniformed Partisan Resistance Fighter.)))

Lel. I have been rewriting headlines for fun.

I’m a partisan agains adamite filth
Just quit my job today too , gonna do dab on some boomer filth
Better come get me faggots before something rash happens

I've been planning on looking at the last 100-1000 headlines from jew sources, ie huffington post, etc, and analyzing them. These headlines are so lazily created I would bet a regex could detect 90% of them.

Anglin did nothing wrong.

hi (((little manlet Andy!)))

This might be the dumbest shill post I've seen yet on the topic.

honestly this is what I thought when his reasoning for being uniformed, but I didn't want to bother looking up the legalities behind it.

get rammed, shill. we can see your glowing minora. go back to half chan

oy vey did I hurt (((Daily Stormer's))) feelings? you poor jewish fags had to take a break from tonguing (((weev's))) asshole to type this. unless I suppose you multitask or act as a faggot coven, both real possibilities

No one cares.

>(((Aryan)))
truly a face of the (((movement)))

Attached: Andrew_Anglin.png (880x580, 701.48K)

I still see no arguments against Daily Stormer. And yes I know that weev is probably a jew, and I don't really care. Their news coverage is ok.

You are really retarded if you think anyone considers Anglin "face of the movement". What movement are you talking about? It's just some guys posting their edgy news commentary. What exactly is there wrong about them doing that?

You shills must be getting overwhelmed lately.

(1) kvetching

Still no argument against anything Anglin/Weev said or did. Can you give at least one?

...

A fact is not intended as an argument, jew.

What about the Rhodesians? They were citizens who had lived there legally and without harming anyone.

Just leave.


This user gets it.


This one is dumber than shit.


He had an insignia. That's a uniform. Don't you dare assume his military status, you bigot!

Attached: Untitled.png (1100x579, 753.03K)

Weev is most likely subversive due to his racial predisposition as a kike, he seems to like pushing the narrative of whites being the only ones at fault and that whites deserve it etc. while there is little focus on the kikes or the other racial foreigners in his work. I do not know if he is a fed asset, but i would not trust him and his weebfriend Anglin with his history of committing racial defilement with "jailbait philinos" to be worthy comrades in the struggle. They are probably still degenerate as fuck and only good if you want to have your news in shitpost form every now and then. Also, i recall Anglin claiming that Asians need to get special status in the ethnostate. Lol.

wait weev is gay? since when

I am wise enough not to take them more seriously than they present themselves. Daily Stormer is a humorous news commentary blog first and foremost, and its target audience is american teenager. I judge them on their merit, and so far they were able to provide me with commentary I can agree with.

NZ: 49 Get 72 Virgins Each in Christchurch
Fixed.

Never read any of this shit, guys. Why does it interst you ? Isn't it all some faggot's opinion ? I much prefer your opinions and those of feds and bots to some niggerjew who wants famesies. Facts are good, too, when they can be confirmed.

Also, keylogging is shit compared to style metering. Do not have any typos, as they are more unique than you think.

muh opressed "palestinian peoples" in Palestina!

It's just something I can quickly browse when I take a shit. I don't know any other news sites worth reading. Maybe you would recommend some?

He's going to recommend you rear haaretz or huffpost, moveon etc…

Notice you'll never get an actual argument against DS. They know it's the safest place to get information b/c Anglin always shills against violence and they don't want young, organized and stable white males of good charachter.

They WANT to foster and control the spurging.

There are none, other than Zig Forums and some other boards, depending on site.
I read mailing lists for software I use or about other random shit.
cpunks.org

Lel. I would say Yahoo news if I wanted to give somebody cancer.

Saint Brenton contacted the same Knight Templars group that Breivik did, and they gave him this mission, just like they gave Breivik his.

I complained that I could not access the DS yesterday her on Zig Forums to what I assume was a post by Weev or Anglin, and today the problem was fixed.

Both also listen to anons and change their opinions if presented with good arguments, and that is not something the glownigger controlled would do. That you never get a thank you, from neither Weev or Anglin, when you convince them of something, is also an indication they are legit, because it's not fun to admit defeat, even when it's the rational thing to do.

classic example of jew headline generation

take your degenerate image elsewhere you scabby pus-filled cunt

Send the Jewish and Muslim rats to the deserts of the Middle East where they belong or send them to Hell.

Attached: The Great Replacement.png (8271x9361, 8.06M)

I'm calling the NZ police to inform dem cunts of this cunt here be saying shit about making military bases in NZ.

pick one you dumb fuck.

Attached: d9420606b7c6b3fbe0d570c9592136e1e743bed6bb00891b7087a4a0841a5087.jpg (662x393, 56.08K)

Do you even know what the fuck you are saying?

You're fucking glowing, nigger

No one is in charge of this.

...

BUT WAIT
What about Genocide as defined by the U.N?
In that case, the Muslims represent an attacking force, sent here to facilitate our genocide.
They are NOT civilians.
They are soldiers of demographic warfare / biological weapons.
Rape gangs of Rotherham and elsewhere proves they are militarized agents of genocide.
The real problem is.
WHAT INTERNATIONAL COURT OR TRIBUNAL WOULD ACCEPT THIS LINE OF ARGUMENT, WHEN IT IS HEADED AND STAFFED BY JEWS AND THEIR LACKEYS?

I think Brenton Tarrant might be the second coming. Here to lead us to victory over the satanic jews and muslims.

and that is why he carried out his shooting in a foreign country, right?
National Zionism is a mental illness.