This thread is not another thread on the divide between civic nationalism and ethnonationalism, instead it is based on yet another divide in nationalist thought: universalizing nationalism and particularistic nationalism. The former term is what I refer to as "cucked nationalism". It is on the level of civic nationalism in terms of its abhorrence to any National Socialist who truly understands the philosophy. Universalizing nationalism is the belief that all peoples should have a state and a claim to existence on this Earth. Particularistic nationalism is the nationalism of National Socialism. It operates from a truly Völkisch standpoint: one's own people are their first and only interest in this world of eternal struggle. Operating from this standpoint, as Hitler did, one's own race – in this case the Aryan race – is the center-point of one's worldview and concerns. It makes no claims at what should be, but instead operates from the National Socialist view that history is the progression of a people's struggle for existence.
What sort of nationalist are you if you advocate for blacks or, God forbid, even Jews having their own little chunk of the Earth? Why should anything beyond the standpoint of your own Volk even enter into your mind? Hitler states in Mein Kampf that National Socialism is "A philosophy of life which endeavors to reject the democratic mass idea and give this earth to the best people – that is, the highest humanity…"
While the aims of our immediate struggle are the ending of the ongoing white genocide and the reclamation of our countries, this will never be the end. Struggle will continue; our people will grow and continue to prosper and, with an expansion of numbers, again spread across this Earth as our ancestors did into the New World, Australia and New Zealand. This Earth will, no matter how many centuries must first pass, be given to the highest humanity, the Aryan race.
