Britfag here, got some advice for redpilling people and also some observations on the remain camp. Am I the only one that has noticed most remainers are also the same people that preach freedom of speech is essentially only if you agree with them and they also have a habit of being self hating cucks? The area of England I'm from voted overwhelmingly to leave and pretty much every single person I've met through work, friends of friends or family friends are somewhat red pilled. The older generation especially, most I've met look at modern society in disgust and wish it was how it was in the 60s. Now amusingly, my housemate is a remainer and like EVERY single other remainer I have met harps on about another vote even though I know if remain had won they would be calling leavers fascists and accusing us of subverting democracy if we acted how they have in terms of demanding another vote and protesting.
Amusingly, my housemate is also staunchly pro Islam and other various typical left wing things and often makes comments or claims he can't back up with proof and acts like a schizo when questioned.
Some advice for red Pilling those on the left that are blue pilled is simply ask them questions and subvert them with modified responses that you can gradually red pill more and more. An example with racism is to agree with them and suggest that current university forms etc asking race and religion etc are actually racist and discriminate against minorities as it should be iq and merit based and this info isn't needed. I've successfully pushed this area with numerous lefties.
In addition to the above, many seem to be just token gesturing and being PC to seem tolerant, you can subvert them by persistently sending them ridiculous PC articles where anyone can see PC has gone way to far. My observation is they start to question their PC stance and attitude, I've successfully red pilled a few with this in regards to PC culture. You can also suggest it undermines legitimate people who have the right to express themselves.
Islam, this is surprisingly a simple one. Simply state that while you don't have an issue with Muslims, you understand being the tolerant person you are why some might and explain how it wasn't so rampant when your grandparents for example were younger. Explain how mosques don't fit in with the existing culture but you wouldn't object to one's that are stealth and architecturally fit in with the surrounding. Saying these things will generally change their perception and make them realise that mosques etc appear to be alien in comparison to British architecture or European and thus want them to fit in.
Free speech is surprisingly difficult as most insist it doesn't include freedom to offend. I generally argue who deems what to be offensive and draw light to the fact what isn't offensive now was 30 years ago and how we need to secure free speech. I generally use lgtbt or whatever abbreviation it is now to make my point.
Feminism generally isn't an issue, I usually draw light to women only this or that and how women are in my eyes equal and by making a point of focusing on gender we create divide.
You aren't going to convince anyone and certainly not if you argue full Red pill mode as they get defensive. You need to use subversion and lightly change their opinions, agree or not it works. I've even redpilled people on migration by saying it should be iq and skill based as unfettered unskilled migration causes supply and demand issues and as a result reduces wages and economic issues along with housing demand and thus rent and price increases. This is successful most of the time.
Listen to me or not but the above has worked for me dozens of times on far left type morons to at minium remove their extreme elements and make them more right wing.
You don't always need to be so extreme and should listen to them as it enables you to craft an argument and comparison to change their minds.
I won't reveal my own power level but I'm fairly Conservative and have mostly nationalist values, not as extreme as some though. I've learned to compromise and focus on individual issues instead of ideology.
