The point I haven't used it as a source, just asked about this whole story at the talk page. That was enough to start a shitstorm and get me banned for no reason.
Wikipedia
Austin Bailey
Blake Nelson
In fact I rarely edited article, and mostly gaming ones.
Chase Jones
No fucking shit. Why would you give them such an easy out by linking the data to a secondary source that's completely tainted in the eyes of normalfaggots when the original sources are available? Why didn't you just cite to the official US statements? Have you been asleep for the past 10 years with regards to wikipedia's general culture of faggotry? Even the children over at /v/ got completely wise to what you can and can't get away with on wikipedia, and the steps necessary to get anything close to wrongthink on their platform back in 2014.
And ignoring completely the issue of the specific source you used and how your fellow editors would view it, why would you ever use a secondary or tertiary source for citation when that source itself links directly to the primary?
Easton Allen
That is just a sewer right? They don't do anything with all the blood they collect?
Nathaniel Roberts
I had no idea they get mad over a single mention of Daily Stormer, and it was telling the stuff.co.nz censoring its article in the first place. It is not like I spammed Wikipedia with like 9000 links to it. I posted it in single relevant place. And it got me banned for "indecency" and being "racist troll".
Nathaniel Foster
Nope. That is real slaughter house. And no they don't collect blood in Islam, it is considered impure or something like that.
Benjamin Wilson
Another mass murder, that for some reason is not covered at Wikipedia.
Isaiah Edwards
Connor Lewis
You should have cited a more normie-friendly site like the Onion, Babylon Bee, or Duffel Blog.
Lucas Carter
Attempting to take Diaper Boy seriously…
Begs the question: Is there any evidence linking this mosque to al-Qaeda?
Is there any evidence that the shooter was white supremacist? Didn't he deny it?
Are there sources on either point that would pass Wikipedia's sourcing policy?