Accelerationism vs. Open Society vs. White Survival
I'm really pissed off this board has embraced Brenton Tarrant's psy-op / accelerationism as a viable strategy for white survival. It is not!
White survival can only come about through the realization that 1) Accelerationism = Anglo-Zionism, that 2) the alternative is Integrationism or Open Society, and that 3) both of these doctrines lead to white genocide.
An alternative is proposed: Defensism.
==Accelerationism== is Samuel Huntington's Clash of Civilizations, i.e.it's Zbigniew Brzezinski's conquest of the world, it's the Project for a New American Century, it's the Bush family, and it's Israel / Zion.
Accelerationism will prune the West of its few white men, send them it wars against Russia, China, and the Islamic world. This is a suicidal strategy. White men will be massacred, surviving white women will be mass raped by invading hordes of brown people.
==Integrationism==, the globalist alternative to accelerationism, is Open Society, George Soros, diversity, multiculturalism, open borders, "progressive" liberalism.
Integationism, or Open Society, will flood the West with hundreds of millions of immigrants, especially to our cities. Race-mixing propaganda, sexual sabotage, promotion of homosexuality, climate guilt, etc. will help suicide the white race.
Both alternatives guarantee white genocide.
The solution is ==DEFENSISM==: Aggressively protect & defend our nations, our peoples, against both Anglo-Zionism and Open Society globalism. That means, in practice: refuse to fight more wars for Zion AND keep our own borders closed. Resist Accelerationism and refuse to die for Diversity.
We can DEFEND what we have BY MAKING A STAND.