Did Franklin Roosevelt start the beginning of the end of America and the rest of Europe?
He was soft on Communism. His governmet was full of Marxist-Communist sympathizers, and, at the early 1945 Yalta Conference, he refused to listen to Churchill’s warnings and turned Eastern Europe over to the Soviets - Thus, the Poles, Hungarians, Estonians, etc. were forced to live under oppression which included labor camps, organized starvations and dire poverty. He was no friend to World Jewry. In 1939, he refused sanctuary to 900 German Jews who tried to disembark from the ship “St. Louis” forcing them to return to Germany and the awaiting death camps. He did nothing to disrupt the transportation of millions of Jews to Nazi death camps. He knew about it. He could have bombed the railroad system which brought millions of Jews and other innocents to their slaughter.
FDR
Other urls found in this thread:
renegadetribune.com
archive.is
youtube.com
twitter.com
it was Lincoln, Lincoln wanted Henry Clay's American machine aka the military industrial complex, he murdered blacks and whites to do it
...
Well,, he refused to let jews into the country,,so that's good.
People like to think he did, and he played a large part in its demise as his administration was at the forefront of International Jewery, but the real fact is that America died in 1864, at the end of The War of Northern Aggression. The true usurper of the US, the CSA, died and was replaced with a nation of evil and treason, destined to fail.
Fuck outta here
You know its a shill disguised as us when he mentions the holohaux. Which agency are you from? Jidf? Fbi? Nsa? Glow in the dark cia? Mossad? Fuck this place is full of negros.
Woodrow Wilson did. Dumping next few posts. This got shoah'd off the internet, so save it.
As over-leveraged investment houses began to fail in September 2008, the leaders of the Republican and Democratic parties, of major corporations, and opinion leaders stretching from the National Review magazine (and the Wall Street Journal) on the right to the Nation magazine on the left, agreed that spending some $700 billion to buy the investors' "toxic assets" was the only alternative to the U.S. economy's "systemic collapse." In this, President George W. Bush and his would-be Republican successor John McCain agreed with the Democratic candidate, Barack Obama. Many, if not most, people around them also agreed upon the eventual commitment of some 10 trillion nonexistent dollars in ways unprecedented in America. They explained neither the difference between the assets' nominal and real values, nor precisely why letting the market find the latter would collapse America. The public objected immediately, by margins of three or four to one.
When this majority discovered that virtually no one in a position of power in either party or with a national voice would take their objections seriously, that decisions about their money were being made in bipartisan backroom deals with interested parties, and that the laws on these matters were being voted by people who had not read them, the term "political class" came into use. Then, after those in power changed their plans from buying toxic assets to buying up equity in banks and major industries but refused to explain why, when they reasserted their right to decide ad hoc on these and so many other matters, supposing them to be beyond the general public's understanding, the American people started referring to those in and around government as the "ruling class." And in fact Republican and Democratic office holders and their retinues show a similar presumption to dominate and fewer differences in tastes, habits, opinions, and sources of income among one another than between both and the rest of the country. They think, look, and act as a class.
Although after the election of 2008 most Republican office holders argued against the Troubled Asset Relief Program, against the subsequent bailouts of the auto industry, against the several "stimulus" bills and further summary expansions of government power to benefit clients of government at the expense of ordinary citizens, the American people had every reason to believe that many Republican politicians were doing so simply by the logic of partisan opposition. After all, Republicans had been happy enough to approve of similar things under Republican administrations. Differences between Bushes, Clintons, and Obamas are of degree, not kind. Moreover, 2009-10 establishment Republicans sought only to modify the government's agenda while showing eagerness to join the Democrats in new grand schemes, if only they were allowed to. Sen. Orrin Hatch continued dreaming of being Ted Kennedy, while Lindsey Graham set aside what is true or false about "global warming" for the sake of getting on the right side of history. No prominent Republican challenged the ruling class's continued claim of superior insight, nor its denigration of the American people as irritable children who must learn their place. The Republican Party did not disparage the ruling class, because most of its officials are or would like to be part of it.
Never has there been so little diversity within America's upper crust. Always, in America as elsewhere, some people have been wealthier and more powerful than others. But until our own time America's upper crust was a mixture of people who had gained prominence in a variety of ways, who drew their money and status from different sources and were not predictably of one mind on any given matter. The Boston Brahmins, the New York financiers, the land barons of California, Texas, and Florida, the industrialists of Pittsburgh, the Southern aristocracy, and the hardscrabble politicians who made it big in Chicago or Memphis had little contact with one another. Few had much contact with government, and "bureaucrat" was a dirty word for all. So was "social engineering." Nor had the schools and universities that formed yesterday's upper crust imposed a single orthodoxy about the origins of man, about American history, and about how America should be governed. All that has changed.
No, that's Woodrow Wilson and WWI. WWII was just FDR fucking around with the Great Depression with the New Deal, war breaks out, the economy boosts and now everyone thinks he's some genius because it's a intentional push by the Democrats to think the New Deal did fuck all, even though large parts of it were repealed.