What is the best language for Europeans to speak? I mean what language has such deep roots in European culture that it should be the lingua franca of Europe? English? German? Latin? Spanish? What? Or at least what family of languages would be the best. Germanic? Romance? Slavic? I'm curious mainly because I am trying to rediscover my own European heritage (Germanic mostly with a bit of French) and will soon be traveling there to live.
What is the best language for Europeans to speak? I mean what language has such...
Other urls found in this thread:
If you're German you should learn German.
The most European language used to be French since it was spoken by most nobles. Over the long run I'd say the closest to a pan-European modern day language is Italian since it is a direct descendant of Latin and Latin is dead.
Personally I think that the more languages you know the better but to return to the question at hand it depends on your definition of Europe.
Think that German is a given even though for Europe as a whole if not only because of the pure beauty and the way you form sentences it is just has really nice aesthetics but every country should of course still keep their own language while the Scandinavian countries should of course have Swedish as main language of choice in internal discussion.
English could work as a cancerous kind of last resort if communicating with people outside of Europe that doesn't know anything else.
French is also a descendent of Latin. The most similar laguage to Latin spoken by real people today is Sardinian.
What are you talking about? English is the first choice with everyone speaking both outside and inside Europe.
It's the lingua-franca of the modern world. Like French used to be or like Greek once was.
Latin is to the west what Sanskrit is to India. It's by far THE language of the civilization of the west, of its liturgy and intellectual elite, and that every educated European was supposed to know at least to some degree and in which essentially all major works of the west were written in, from the works of the fathers of Catholicism to Newton/Leibniz and their calculus. And obviously, it was the language of the ancient Empire.
Uh, the one I speak.
Yes I agree with you that it is and have been for quite some time but that doesn't mean that it always has to be.
It's mostly based on personal preference seeing as there is nothing that works better as a moral booster as some good old german.
In order to provide some sort of argument, the way that you would form a sentence in german versus english while having a discussion makes it imperative that the other part actually listens because normally you start at the other end of a sentence compared to english if this makes any sence.
The positive consequence of this is that discussions can't really be interrupted and co'opted in the same way as you would be able to in english because you would more than often not get the point being made without the whole context providing a lot more nuanced debates and interviews as some examples.
Study Greek and you will think the way God thinks.
There is no need for one until there's a successor to the Großdeutsches Reich. That will happen organically and our speculation will have zero effect on its trajectory. The future is barreling towards us and yet its nature is ever inscrutable.
It could be funny making spooks learn Hungarian in order to infiltrate us, though.
The best language hasn't been invented yet…but it is going to happen soon.
posted uncropped version with Facegroid link by mistake
Please be patient while I kms
if it continues like that it's gonna be a fucking weird mix
in france young people are literally mixing french words,french grammar,english expression(wtf is widespread as much as lol),arabs expressions,africans expressions…
young people are really acting and being fucking niggers since they copy our arabs/africans wich copy your afro/latino-americans.
Agreed. Time too revive Latin.
Lingua Franca of Europe
How about you go fuck yourself jew
English because its lack of rules and words makes it ideal to express whatever you feel like.
Not really a serious concern, English is probably the most functional language from europe BUT we shouldn't be pursuing a unified language in the first place, english will consume elements from all of it's neighbors as it always has.
Language gives shape to thoughts, speaking different types of languages and being able to reason in multiple languages gives you new ways to shape thoughts, linguistic variety is useful and meaningful, most of the time at least.
In a few hundred years we're probably going to be down to just a small handful of major world languages left, English will dominate the west as it has and native languages will begin to decline like Gaelic has. With gene editing we'll see non white nations bloom a spontaneous white demographic and over time these people will very likely prioritize learning english as they abandon the shithole cultures their ancestors came into and out of; many will retain their latin origin language and I suspect as the gene editing raises IQs in latin origin nations they'll actually try to unify their languages for once, likely by creating a unified new latin bible, this will probably be a method used in new english unifying the latin and asian origin nation's variations with euopean and colonial english variations. China presently looks like it will become the dominant force and therefore it's language will grow in use but a great number of downfalls could beset china, their country is ripe for a fungal disease like candida auris, humid, polluted tight living quarters, it could burn through china and much of asia, other weaknesses come from the destruction of chinese culture during maoist reign, they having no real attachment to their culture, land and people could decline as the west has and be preyed upon by parasitic peoples of which they have had no experience with in the past, ultimately china's neighbors hate china and likely wont want to learn mandarin unless they need it to make a living.
Well Europe for most of its history, like 20,000 years or so, spoke a form of "Gaelic" and all Indo-Aryan languages can be formed into Gaelic so basically learn how to think in Gaelic and you'll be able to understand any language that is a derivative of Gaelic, including Latin or even Hebrew.
Being Cymraeg myself.
I object to the idea of other nations speaking our language
Fuck off die in fire
Europe is named after the Semitic Goddess 'Europa' and is a jew-forced maymay found first in maps of the Early Middle Age.
The name of your homeland is Celtae.
What is the best language for Europeans to speak
Whatever language you like from the language group your people speak.
Germanic mostly with a bit of French
The Franks were a Germanic-speaking confederation of tribes.
how did Latin die?
Hebrew is Celtic
I sorta like this answer, although I think naming Europe Celtae sounds like if it belonged to the Celts.
Do they even exist anymore?
If Europe or the World needs a lingua franca, then Latin would be the best choice, but of course, it'd be better if this was sparingly used and every culture kept to its own language mainly.
It didn't. See
They and their derivatives were the dominant culture throughout much of western and central Europe.
All of "Europe" is Celtic.
Do they even exist anymore?
Yes. Croats and others in Dalmatia, mostly, but all the "Balkan" peninsula is Illyria even though most speak Slavic languages now.
As Romans expanded it began being spoken by non Latins, thus vulgar Latin was born, which began even early to diverge into the ancestors of Romance languages. But in the meantime, in Rome at least the elites had their own essentially standardized version of it which remained relatively stable until the empire bit the dust(though even late Republican/Imperial Latin was different from so called archaic Latin, the Latin of the kingdom; some like Cicero and others lament how some ritual formulas going back all the way to the Kingdom were barely understood even by the priests). Latin here officially died* in a sense, but at the same time became immortal as the few elites and scholars left, particularly after the Carolingian Renaissance, made a concerted effort to restore fluency in it, at least of the intellectuals, and to achieve again late Republican/Ciceronian fluency. And indeed they essentially did, as Medieval Latin is more or less the same as Ciceronian Latin, at least if you are reading important authors, bar of course the new words introduced(particularly biblically important ones), a bit more "regular" syntax by our standards and some small grammatical innovations/changes.
*Language death is usually declared when some language stops being spoken continuously, though in the case of Latin there wasn't as much a lack of "native" speakers as a lack of a central authority ensuring the masses didn't completely butcher it into something quite different as modern Romance languages, so different that you just can't call it Latin anymore. Greek in that regard, while definitely different from ancient Greek, was definitely able to stay closer.
I guess the biggest lesson here is that the masses will butcher languages if you leave them to it without some central authority making sure a proper standard is kept, at least for important matters. For this reason in particular I wouldn't want Latin to be resurrected as a mass communication tool, I just know people would butcher it.
I listen to Danzig in Latin.
shut it down the gintlí know
They are very related, though it might have been just larping by Christian Celts, to be the real "jews" or something but going through all the written records you'll see both the Gaels claim it as well as others who study it both come to the same conclusion. See the book, there are many other books on the same topic.
Celtic + Germanic tribe spread. Excludes Slavic/Illyric-, Italic-, Hispanic-, and Norse-speaking tribes.
I think it's more likely to be a coincidence.
Considering our innate xenophobia
larping as jews
The Founding Fathers of America did the same. They thought of themselves as israelites or some shit. Dumbfucks.
Italian and Greek.
Nordaboos need to fuck off.
Conlangs are jewlangs
The name of your homeland is Celtae.
That doesn't seem to be the case now. Slavs, Nords, Meds, Germanics, Dinarics, etc. aren't Celtic. Ireland and perhaps Iberia are celtic, but not the rest of it.
The four primary super ethnicities in the above IE family tree include:-
1. Anatolian- (Extinct)
2. Celto-Italo- Tocharian (The last named is extinct)
3. Balto- Slavo- Germanic. 4. Aryano- Greco- Armenic.
See also Handbook of Formal Languages: Volume 1. Word, Language, Grammar
By by Grzegorz Rozenberg (Editor), Arto Salomaa (Editor)
The expansion of R1b people into Old Europe was slower, but proved inevitable
Traditionally, all Indo-European languages were divided into "centum" and "satem" languages, after the Latin and Avestan words for "100," respectively. Most importantly, the Indo-Iranian (Sanskrit, Persian, etc.) and Slavic languages are "satem" languages. However, this particular isogloss is now no longer taken to reflect a fundamental division in descent. In the chart above, Russian, the principal Slavic language, will be seen to be more closely related to German and to Latin than to Sanskrit; and Greek, a "centum" language, is more closely related to Sanskrit than to the others. What has happened is that more features have been taken into account and the overall greater similarities between Greek and Sanskrit outweigh a lesser point that Sanskrit seems to share with Slavic languages.
The Position of Anatolian in Indo-European
The current communis opinio is best described as a reconciliation of the Schwund-Hypothese and revised PIE: Anatolian is considerably less archaic than previously thought, and the label PN IE is warranted for ‘classical’ IE languages.
Greek, Sanskrit, and Closely Related Languages
most of europe
Lel. Thats what you think.
Hallstatt 1200 - 500 BC
La Tène 500 BC - 1 AD
Which language would be most suitable for Europe?
Latin has always been used by people (until the 19th century almost exclusively europe) as a language for high positions.
Latin then of course.the administration and books were almost always Latin in europe.the government did not yet register, the church did, which did the registration of the church members.
For English, Latin was the absolute world language.as european language? No then German! English in that case certainly not, England is not on the European mainland.there are certainly more German-speaking Europeans than English-speaking Europeans.germany is also the heart of Europe.it is centrally located.
Although not necessarily the heart, it is still centrally located.
the English empire was very big.they have done so by stealing land from other European superpowers, rather than by conquering it themselves.in that respect, England is a pussy country.cancer england.
Well well they do it themselves.oh well.
and that's why English has become the world language.
But there is not really a language for all white breeds, (race) you know, no.
Each breed finds its own language more important.
They will never give in to the language of another white breed.
If all white breeds (white races) would unite, they should do the following four languages: Russian, Latin, German, and English.
It's that easy.
there is much to say about it,but it is so very easy,you now.
Long live racism!
Únětice 2300 - 1600 BC
Tumulus 1600 - 1200 BC
Kill all jews in america,not in europe.
If you are in europe and want to Kill not negro apes or women:Kill Americans!
Americans hi ha !!!!!!!
Kill cunt negro apes apes hojo hi ha ! ! !
Long live racism!!!!
Kill all traitors and negroes.
Those were centuries upon centuries now - they've became different ethnic groups than fucking celts, lad.
because all these areas have been touched upon by celts, they are now celtic
Same logic that someone is your ethnicity because they share half a haplotype with you. Are hapas fully white because they have white blood?
These two images and associated dates >>13132559 show ~3,000yrs of Celtic Europe. 1,000 years longer than whatever jew-divided shit people have now, and most European "nations" (states) are less than 500yrs old. And this is just agreed on history, not actual history, which is likely older given the Celtic masonry at Göbeklitepe and the dates of the Henges in the Isles, most of which go back another 1,000yrs, predating the Yamnaya and Corded pottery cultures.
Now you're switching from celts to corded ware, of which celts descended from, but not all white nationalities have came from.
*latinizes ur continent*
all of europe is not celtic
Not only do they share similar linguistic, art, pottery, and burrial types, they share similar dna going back as far as 7,000yrs ago and are almost identical to modern Europeans 5,000yrs ago at the beginning of the Bronze Age.
Pic very related.
See And here is larger scope of dna.
cum!!!! lol cum!!!!!!!! im cumming oh oh oh oh WOWWWW omg !!!!
Here is a moe comparable world dna spread.
Corded ware ≠ Celtic
It's like saying all of europe is Nordic or Slavic because they too descended from the Corded Ware. Celts are just one people that came from them.
1. Your own
English is, or at least was, the most expressive and diverse language as it contained many influences from both the Germanic and Latin regions of Europe. It is considered by many to be the most poetic language because of its vast dictionary (being able to use a word derived from the French, Spanish, Germans or native British gives you much more options) and, assuming that it is properly mastered, allows the speaker to present their ideas in multiple different ways all with slight nuances which allow for a more full understanding.
English is the master language so long as one is well versed in it. What we see today is largely butchered or specialised English where speakers have a relatively low vocabulary, which completely nullifies all the benefits of it. The degradation of the language by jews has also contributed immeasurably to its weakening; with broad, vague, abstract and largely meaningless terms becoming the norm. Just at look how our enemies will disregard certain views in lazy ways, such as condemning us as 'nazis' or 'hateful'; for the moment we at least have several words being used, but both of them have no wider meaning beyond 'bad' or 'evil'. Think of all the words that the English language gives to present slightly nuanced portrayals of 'bad/evil'; draconian implies a hint of tyranny and over-bearing, wicked implies an inherent malice or spite, vengeful portrays that the perpetrator believes they are acting in retaliation, degenerate shows that they are becoming something lesser, then we have abominable, vile, cretinous, weasely, monstrous, barbaric, murderous, abhorrent, and so on, and so on, and a million metaphors and similes more as well. Its fair that some people will have some few favoured expressions, but by refusing to use anything beyond 'hateful/bigoted/racist/fascist/nazi', and with all of them losing their differentiating factors (for instance calling opponents of cultures or religions as racist, which makes the 'race' part of the word pointless for expressive purposes) we see the English language become no better than many others which provide limited methods of expression.
So if you're going to use the English language, please try to master it otherwise you are just contributing to its desecration.
If your language has aggluination its retarded.
Implying that Tatars and other (((Turkic))) people are White
Implying that Turkic (((Khazaria))) is White
Thanks Shlomo very cool!
Oy vey goy give up on Indo European languages with agglutination goy!
Learn Chinkychonk language without agglutination goy!
That's like saying a German-american isn't the same as an ancient Germanic-celt even though they share the same dna groups because time has passed. Fuck time.
Celtae is eternal.
And so are the Germanic people.
I think that yellow is some sort of Asian Haplogroup, user.
So by your logic, a half asian half german is the same as a germanic celt because they both share the same DNA?
Good thing you don't believe in the "Out of Africa" theory, or else you'd say we're all niggers.
That's like saying a German-american isn't the same as an ancient Germanic-celt even though they share the same dna groups because time has passed.
No, Celts are one of the peoples who descended from Corded Ware, and thus are seperate from the other euro-descended volk. I thought you liked having your cultures seperate and preserved instead of assimilating them all within one people's name.
are you fucking retarded
No, but you are, judging by that response.
Fuck me, you Americans are fucking insufferable. And I say this as a fellow new worlder.
Europe isn't a single country with a single people. We all have our own languages. There's no ideological reason (or otherwise) for why French people should know Russian, or why Ukrainians should speak German.
French for French, Russian for Russians, German for Germans.
Wait until you read "WE WUZ CELTZ"poster.
unable to grasp that celts were one of many people to come from corded ware culture, and instead insists that all corded-ware derived peoples are celts because they all share a haplotype/haplogroup
the concept of hordes of people invading europe and fucking whatever tribe was there before out of existence completely eludes them
when faced with opposing facts, they double down on their retardation
even their own goddamn pictures admit that they're seperate people and not the same
It didn't die. It evolved. It just evolved differently in each of the various countries that used to speak it.
No, that would actually be Lithuanian. Lithuanian is so conservative it actually has a significant number of strong cognates with Sanskrit.
If there is any language Lithuanians should learn, the is closest to proto indo European, it would be Lithuanian
adoughanjoufklkjhjhhujjjhj jhhjjkhggkgyghvghbj ihuihuiih hhuhuihuihiuihuhuihiuhiuhuihiuhuihiuhuihuhuhiuhuhiuhuhuhuuhuhuuhihuihuihihiuhiuh uuhuiui
Latin you fools
But also your country's language. Don't just go full anglo on it
Also every European language has been heavily influenced by Latin. At least every language spoken by Catholics.
its pretty pleb behaviour to be monolingual in 2020
here are some good aryan languages to expand your cultural knowledge arranged by amount of literature available, popularity and speakers worldwide
German should be the lingua franca for Germanic countries.
So if you are Swedish, Norwegian, etc best start learning it. And maybe move here. We'd like to incorporate your genetics into ours.
Why can't we just use Folkspraak as the lingua franca for every germanic country and use Icelandic for religious rituals and scriptures?
Hello to you too.
Are you fucking retarded?
lets you speak to the entire post soviet sphere
lets you read old byzantine and alexander era text
Is there a reason you would suggest not learning some languages Mr 1984?
Cymru am byth
It's nice that you're looking back at your heritage but English is superior. It's a German/Latin hybrid with loose enough rules to be able to say almost anything with complete distinction, something other languages don't offer.
We take it for granted, that we can say the same thing in many different ways. This is the nature of English' supremacy, and it's something other languages cannot do. Insofar as language dictates how we think, it's evermore important.
I learn as much as possible because every language is applicable in English, that doesn't mean it should be bastardized, it makes it neat as fuck.
That's because Israel is Aryan clay and the Turks pretending to be "God's chosen ones" are retarded shitskins who's only power is the syndicalism brought about by a religion they think they invented.
Rothschilds are full blooded Scottish Jews, for example; Scottish are one of the original tribes. Turks are not, and Israel is basically 98% Turkish. Most of the problem Jews in politics? Also Turkish. The Torah even speaks of false Jews living in a fake Israel.
Jews entire heritage is false
White Privilege is just Aryan peoples being God's Chosen
People who think they're Jewish and currently exist as a cabal are about to wake up and get thrown out of Israel or turn into slaves
Hi Hasbara, what's it like being fucking goyim? Must suck to know your entire life was spent sucking Aryan dick only to get thrown out of a country we lied to you about.
English, French, German, Spanish and Russian are all multiculturalist languages now.
You should at a minimum speak two or three of those (English + Russian is a good spread of access to content)
But if you want to do your bit for fighting against the invasion you really must learn a minority language - Norwegian, Welsh, Czech - Something unpopular with the jew and the nig.
The Jews in my part of the world are all Russians - there are literally zero Jews or muzzies who speak my language.
English if you're white, something else if you're not white. Closest relative to English is German but English is the only language a white man needs
We take it for granted, that we can say the same thing in many different ways.
Russian beats English in that regard.
I swear I'm not the same Russian commie fags that have been flooding Zig Forums now for months trying to get everyone on Zig Forums to speak slavrunes
loose enough rules to be able to say almost anything with complete distinction, something other languages don't offer
what the fuck does that even mean
Imagine speaking like Shakespeare, that's the German language (at least for now).
It also has >23 million different words (not counting different forms of the same word).
Classical Greek. Even the Roman elite used it more than Latin and the original bible was Greek.
Balts are also genetically closest to proto-Indo-Europeans
HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES
I cannot wait for the day that tor-posting is banned.
Yes, it was originally devised by a kike to remove the languages of the goyim, but it's based on European languages and is actually highly criticized for that fact. But it's easy to learn and makes sense for everyone to know their own language but speak Esperanto to communicate with other Europeans… it's so easy to learn that you can become proficient in 3 months. In any case it's more logical as a "common" language than fucking English as it is now.
Remember that Lingua Franca thread years ago where we decided English was superior bc it was already in place and had elements of many languages, but Latin was the best bc it was the foundation of religion and science and taught in universities, but decided to learn Icelandic instead bc it was less corrupted, yet still used, yet obscure enough to use as a code language, but never even got started and settled on English as "good enough" for MAGA, while the few of us that even tried fucked around with German on Duolingo, cuz Hitler, but gave up and rationalized it as being a cuck language? Pepperidge Farm remembers
It died, Spanish, Italian, French, etc. are not evolved versions of Latin, they are sourced in ancient Latin dialects and then mixed with several other languages to create their modern languages, but Latin, itself, died
What is the best language to speak in Europe?
Latian or germanic?
Also if you want to want to regain any european heritage I suggest you to start making plans how to nuke Israel otheriwise soon there won't be any "heritage" left
The heart and soul of Europe is in Latin countries, the obsession over the lesser important Germanic regions are due to Amerimutts needing to convince themselves that they are the descendants of the literal model of peak Whiteness. That's classic burger "the sun revolves around the US of A!" thinking.
Now is not the time to be arrogant when everything has become fucked under our watch, anglo-user.
Nah man we didn't give up we're still learning German, just finished the 4k Anki deck and am reading books now.
<hey Americans, stop respecting the Germanic (ie Celtic and Nordic) heritage you hold
How about you fuck off? Yeah most white Americans are of some sort of Germanic stock. But at the same time most Germanic cultures and languages are closer to proto-Indo European than Latin is, thus more conservative than Latin.
Latin is a Celtic language. Germanic languages are thought to be a mix between some ENF language and Norse.
Define conservative, because it seems that slavs and meds are the ones against rapefugees and lgbtwtf bullshit, and germanics and scandinavians are ones for it.
Germanic cultures and languages are closer to proto-Indo European than Latin is, thus more conservative than Latin.
thanks for the comedic relief
That one has its roots in pretty much every European language.
Otherwise, your own country's. Forget those fantasies about a united Europe under one flag. Our nations and peoples might cooperate with each other, but not unify like the (((EU))) wants.
Don't you know, Europe only contains Britain, Germany, France and Spain
Obviously much more conservative than the US, HAH
moar mabs breeeze !!!!
Original Latin of Rome, not vulgar latin of cathlicucks.
Vulgar latin is the original Latin and comes from Italic you nigger. These are Celtic languages.
Yo! I thahnk aht ahs obvahous what da Europea laguage of choahce wahll be. What it is, Mama! Ya'll is mad stupid! Sahmple ta understa' across all IQ levels
Catholics' Latin is not vulgar Latin, it's medieval Latin, which is very very close to Classical/Ciceronian Latin, considering that the latter was the standard by which proper Latin as a language of the intellectual elite was recovered starting from the Carolingian renaissance. Bar some small grammatical changes, which tend to make it closer to modern western languages(i.e things like the more widespread use of auxiliary verbs like debeo to imply a "must" compared to classical Latin's passive periphrastic, or the syntax) and the obvious addition to the vocabulary coming mostly from biblically related sources(Greek and hebrew) and to a smaller extent from the Germanic world, it's more or less the same. Learning medieval Latin properly will ~100% allow you to read the classical authors with little additional effort(especially to get through the often cryptic syntax of some authors). Latin in its immortal classical shape has basically remained more or less static in form since the time of Cicero.
You missed the point. Latin and Sanskrit are similar in the sense that both languages were used by the elite of their respective empires, nations etc.
The majority of people in Europe ended up speaking some other language other than Latin or a bastardized version of Latin which was called Vulgar Latin which then split into Romance languages like French, Italian, Spanish etc.
In India, a similar thing was observed. The people there spoke Prakrit (Sanskriti means "High Culture" in Sanskrit, and Prakriti means "Natural" - you can guess how that influences the position of the languages). Prakrit then split into modern Indo-Aryan languages like Hindi, Marathi, Punjabi etc.
The other two languages families which persist in Europe and India are the Uralic languages and the Indo-Dravidian languages. It seems that Indo-European expansion in both the places halted after sometime, allowing languages like Finnish, Hungarian (Uralic) and Tamil, Malayalam (Dravidian) to survive.
Today the use of Latin is restricted to mottos, titles and generally ceremonial things. A similar status is for Sanskrit in India.
Kys Anglo faggot
It is what it is
pay your infidel taxes, infidel
This is the only right answer in the thread.
Ĉi tiu estas la sola ĝusta respondo en la fadeno.
Latin wasn't reserved by the elite in Rome. Latin was the regional tongue, and it was mostly clerical in government, as everyone preferred Greek in the Greek world, until its thought the first century BC. Its difficult to tell when latin overtook greek really, because the Romans were not great chroniclers.
I've heard spanish and italians claim that English is not a rich language, perhaps because of their own limited use of it, but also their focus on quantity of nouns being the important part, or perhaps complexity of grammar.
I then present to them that English has twice the words of spanish, and point out the triple layered adjectives, and infinitely more variable verbs allowing for depth of expression. For the skilled user, English is a master's tool of eloquence and detailed nuance; for the standard user, it is merely a convenient conveyor of simple ideas.
an autismal spic-speak with pointless diacritical marks invented by a jew
Afrikaans would be a good Zig Forums mother tongue.
-not a dead language (yet)
-easy to learn
-only used by whites (and some coloreds)
-is viewed by the world as an inherently racist language
I'm sure your knowledge of Romance languages is totally good enough on the other hand to come out with laughable shit as "infinitely more variable verbs allowing for depth of expression".
This. I speak both languages, and Spanish (from Spain) is an infinitely sweeter and robust language as clunky English. I imagine Italian must be more so.
I've heard someone say that English is a disgusting mishmash of Germanic/French/Latin/Greek and sounds like a soulless extraction of all of them mixed together into a uniform grey goo.
If you want to live in a homogenous white society just try learning hungarian or polish language.
If you want to live among shitskin keep speak english and learn spanish, french, german, arabs or turkish.
Fuck off EU whore
Afrikaans is without doubt the most Zig Forums language, easy to learn, Dutch is very close to English, and in many ways Afrikaans is simplified Dutch, but at the same time it is obscure enough that nowhere near as many people understand it as English
English is good as a "universal" language to provide the necessary connection between Europe and its overseas offshoots (the States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand…) We share enough of the same culture, our ethnicities are close enough, we are all part of the White European community. We have common history and many ties.
That's why English is perfect in its current position.
Now, other than that of course it would be highly beneficial for Europeans to learn at least one of such languages as German (because it gives you semi-understanding of all Germanic languages), French (another major part of European culture), Italian, possibly Greek; etc.
Everyone should speak at least one language other than their own.
Ties to Eastern Europe would be great, for anyone willing to connect with these countries in any way. And it goes without saying that it's easy to learn the language that resembles your own, so Slavic peoples could learn each other's languages. Polish is great, Ukrainian/Russian could be useful.
BUT ENGLISH is still something necessary to maintain the current position European/White culture has in the world, and to enable resistance against overpopulation and all the evils caused by non-Whites to our society.
English in my opinion.
the masses will butcher languages if you leave them to it without some central authority making sure a proper standard is kept
Which is essentially what has happened to English through the pervasive Americanisation and Ebonics influence.
Latin is to the west what Sanskrit is to India
No that would be Ancient Greek, not the Koine Greek of the new Testament.
English would be analogous to the cruder and more vulgar latin.
Solid post from this user
no, ancient Greek was the intellectual language of the ancient mediterranean world, in particular of the eastern world, not of the West, by the latter I obviously mean the civilization which traditionally begins with the rise of the Frankish empire and the coronation of Charlemagne
for this civilization, Latin was the sacred and intellectual language
in fact, especially after the west-east schism, ancient Greek in western Europe was not well known, I think westerners only rediscovered Plato after the fall of Constantinopolis and the movement of Byzantine scholars to Italy, which is also why Aristoteles at the time dominated the scene
Ezek a LARP-er niggerek nem érdemlik meg, hogy használják a nyelvünket!
All of them tbh.
Go make me a taco, bean person.
wherever your roots are. my family hails from the Iberian peninsula so I speak Spanish. not the bastardized dialect we gifted to the South American savages mind you. the problem is Spain is so fucking pozzed I feel very little kinship with it anymore. it’d be unrecognizable to my ancestors
Unironically classical ancient Greek, the basis of all Western Civilisation.
there are people on this board who are so fucking stupid they can't tell the difference between Spanish, Portuguese, and Esperanto
Why would anyone recognize the jewish meme language esperanto though
Reconquista the peninsula. It's in your blood.
I vote Proto-Indo European
fictional jew language
Kom ons leer Afrikaans
English is the new Latin (which was the new Greek).
Unless you want to resurrect proto-indo-European.
Portugal was the go-to place for spying and diplomacy during World War II. Maintaining its neutrality as it supplied both sides with tungsten (essential for manufacturing weaponry), of which it had some of the biggest reserves in the world. From there comes the theme from 007 "Casino Royale", referring to the Estoril Casino in Lisbon.
False. They're as much "Latin" as any of the modern "Arabic" dialects are "Arabic" or Chinese dialects are "Chinese". The only difference is politics. If the Roman Empire was still a thing, they'd all be considered dialects of Latin.
As Israelites in the dispersion migrated into Europe and other places, their languages morphed into what you see today, Celtic, German, English, Scandinavian, etc…
Icelandic is the least corrupted because it's the least Latin.
But it is a germanic language, yeah ?
icelandic is closest to old german, it is the purest germanic language out there.
When you look at reconstructed proto Indo-European it sounds and reads like german.
I can speak english, german, french and latin by the way.
Metropolitan trash calling for a universal language for everyone to use inevitably bring about the destruction of their own morals and traditions. And, most importantly, the degradation of their language so that any retard could speak it, thus eliminating one of the most important barrier separating them from other tribes. English, French and Russian are all simplistic languages due to this desire. And look at them now:
the UK was the capital of the chosenites before they were given Israel, which was given to them by the bongs unconditionally as a gift
the bongs are also too cucked to leave the EU and the scots are too cucked to leave the UK despite them in both scenarios bitching 24/7 about how they are sick and tired and despite them being given the opportunity to actually do something about it
ignoring the retarded shit about "muh 56%" the US exhibits very obvious psychological behaviours that you see in mixed-race individuals, where one person may be hapa but may proclaim the achievements of both of their parents' races as their own or simply pick-and-choose whichever one they find the most appealing
and the behaviours also exist in individuals from the US that aren't mixed-race, where they will demonstrate this retarded mentality when they are 20% Greek, 30% Irish, 25% German and 25% French (which they do largely due to a loss of identity for which the solution they seek is to simply try to snag a bit from someone else that they observe having a stronger bond)
the frogs have gone so far to destroy their own gene pool that they have to make it outright illegal to publish ethnic stats, which forces them to use pseudo-ethnic indicators instead
Russia in its entirety is just a multiculti state and the people, just like their frog aristocracy, have no concept of nation, to them nation is just what the government calls itself
And this does not mean that you shouldn't learn other languages. Knowing other languages gives you a competitive edge but what shouldn't be forgotten is that you should still maintain your own and keep it alive. For example, modern Germans absolutely love the idea of Prussia and can't stop jerking off to it, but none of them actually know that it had its own language and even less know that Prussian wasn't a Germanic language. They just accept its deletion from existance as self-evident and are more than happy to wear the skin of its corpse without knowing anything about it. And this applies not just to younger generations but also to people that were old enough to see it wiped off the map.
And by "your own" I don't just mean the language of your country but also the dialects you use.
If you can't speak reconstructed proto-Indo-European then get the fuck off my continent, plebs.
We should each have our own cultural language for cultural reasons and also learn modern English as a universal language to communicate across countries since English is the most widely known European language. So everyone will know two languages minimum. Englishmen such as myself should learn Old English and use that as our cultural language.
Is the USA considered a Germanic country? No offense to the Brits but most White States west of N-E are German af
Evola recommended German because it the Aryan language that is most like the ones old Aryans spoke. It's the least changed. English is a modern mish-mash of various languages, thus not good.
Read Evola's essay The Decay of Words.
You dense fuck, “Gaelic” isn’t a language. The three Goidelic languages are Irish Gaelic, Scottish Gaelic and Manx. And as a Gaeilge speaker myself I can tell that all of what you said is bullshit.
it the Aryan language that is most like the ones old Aryans spoke
bah, that's quite an exaggerated statement imho
he seems to be referring more or less to the loss of the case system in many western languages as well as some verbal functions, from Romance ones to Scandinavians, but in that regard, while German is somewhat more conservative regarding cases, Balto-Slavic ones are much more, and Greek isn't bad either. German has only 4 cases left of the old IE ones and doesn't even decline nouns anymore aside from some vestigial declination left in the masculine and neuter genitive and some dative ones, it essentially declines only pronouns and adjectives
German kinda feels like a halfway between western hyper analytic/grammaticized languages and east European ones
in terms of verb structure, Romance languages probably lost less compared to proto-IE, German like English and I guess Scandinavian ones doesn't even have a declination system for the future but uses the auxiliary, and the same is true essentially for the conjunctive, which in its declined form is barely used, while in Italian for instance it not only has a full declination but is also used more intensively and often similarly to Latin
in fact, Italian for instance to some respect added conjugations and verb tenses compared to Latin, while it also lost others
bah, that's quite an exaggerated statement imho
Could be, I am paraphrasing from memory.
Did someone say Cymru?
"Among the European languages, perhaps only German has preserved something of its archaic structure (and this is why German has a reputation for being “difficult”)"
Why do people praise Evola again? First paragraph and it is already fucking wrong.
Stupid people are stupid. They think everything is "hard". They mean 'difficult'.
if you do not want to waste time you should start from Ελληνική or also Latin. If you already know english you can travel as a torurist through all of europe with not many problems.
German. If you dive into revisionist history, it'll become pretty obvious, expecially if you find out about the importance and secrets of the Printing Press and what it has to do with the concept of "nations."
Can you spell it out a little more, though?
Spanish and /thread
Every single country in Europe teaches English. Whatever second language you choose will only be relevant in a small area.
Ideally speak your own language.
But consider learning Chinese.
The best European language would be the one with the most entirely white speakers as a percentage, not your shitskin speak.
Modern Scots are descended from the Scoti i.e. Irish settlers from Ulster.
Baltic languages ftw.
Not only geographic area but the specific network of people you have access to, and the quality of the speakers. For example speaking German will give you access to high quality speakers, plus a global network of Zig Forumsacks
plane cuicumque se Europeum appellat latinam aliquantum discendam est, saltem ut sermones maiorum sat bene intellegi possint
tecum sto, sed his dictis non sunt permulti homines qui et latine bene loquuntur et non NPCs sunt. Etenim me iamiam sat taedet sententias romanorum graecoruquem legere. Quid legam, ubi loquam? Mox Romam petam ut ibi linguam latinam graecamque viva voce studeam, itaque opus est mihi aliquid legere et loqui.
Indo-European languages are for niggers and slaves. There is only one truly european language
Indo-European languages are for niggers and slaves. There is only one truly european languague
You're right, it's called Basque.
Be literally any other Romance speaker
Speak bastardized peasant Latin
"Latin is a dead language!"
So after reading the thread,
and Zig Forums's own, Afrikaans are the White Man's languages.
What does high Latin sound like?
infeliciter puto latine fluenter loqui hodie esse ars paucorum, praesertim apud nos Zig Forumsiticos, utinam ipse possem eam viva voce Romae discere, ars loquendi tantum colloquendo bene discitur, sit latine aut anglice aut theodisce aut alia, non est enim alia bona via(praeter vel anglice, interrete fortasse satis est nonnullis)
at latine legere fortasse sat est plurimis qui modo auctores antiquae vel mediae aetatis intellegere cupiunt, e.g si quis recens translatio aliquantum incerta sit circa aliquas res politicas philosophicasque, sum ipse saepe incertus ambiguusque
iam hora dormiendi est, ergo nunc discedo, vale, ignote
it's called Basque
interesting, I didn't know its root were non-indoeuro. kudos. however, most of the language is actually borrowed from indo-european, it seems, unlike ugaric
ile the few of us that even tried fucked around with German on Duolingo, cuz Hitler, but gave up and rationalized it as being a cuck language? Pepperidge Farm remembers
I don't remember any of that but I am learning German because there is a wealth of Drittes Reich publications and only a few are translated and what translations exist are suspect to say the least. On that note DeepL.com is great and if you have a transcript with few or no errors (very good OCR and source material or hand-made) you can upload it in docx format and have it translated fairly accurate. There are websites and tools you can install that do pdf<>doc(x), the websites have a page or size limit after which they want you to pay to use them, you can use a pdf splitter/joiner tool to get around this.
Nobody knows the origin of the Basque language. Many theorize that it is from Atlantis, the stone age etc…it's so ancient in fact that the word for hammer is the same as the word 'stone'; from the stone age.
I do know that the phonology of modern Spanish comes directly from how Basque sounds since Basque pre-dates Roman settlement and Spanish language development.
I hate this gay meme so much. Only an Anglo could find this shit funny.
The OI MATE type.
…and, iirc, the language only survived due to a genetic eccentricity, namely that rh- women auto-abort babbys from rh+ men
and people don't believe me when I say that 'nationalism' is the purview of females only…not men. This pretty much proves it.
technically, anything larger than tribalism/communalism communialism as in, tribalism for, like, your neighbors, not hippie shit is terribly unnatural, except, perhaps, for females who genetically represent the aggregate gene pool. I'm not a biologist, but I had one explain it to me one time. Something about how the rate of gene exchange between X chromosomes is very high, so women are actually amalgamations of the historic gene pool whereas men actually have a (much more) distinct "lineage" (father to son)