I'd like to gain some other perspectives as to why those who advocate for accelerationism do so. Because from my current perspective, it's the stance of those who haven't been paying attention to either/and/or the easily distracted & complacent nature of our species/the level of general "not give a fuck" damn near ubiquitous amongst us right now.
Translation: I'm under the impression that I am more intelligent than I actually am.
Unless the accelerationism is ultimately to lead to a general atmosphere for a major trigger point that would cause Chimpamania on a very wide scale by a shutdown of bread & circus then all you're accomplishing is getting them all used to a new norm of general background noise that doesn't ultimately ever affect the vast majority enough at once to make them give a shit, and the bar for tolerance of it gets higher & higher & higher.
Thing is, thats is happening anyway.
What I don't get about anti-accelerationism people is, you act as though this shit isn't happening bereft of the acceleration, but that's the very point - it IS happening bereft of the acceleration, its happening at a slower pace which makes it EVEN EASIER to pull off what you're describing as far as incrementalism and adjustment goes.
So, basically, you have failed to demonstrate that you have ANY FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY to combat this situation in any way whatsoever. If left to your own devices, if the path simply continues at its intended pace, all information suggests nothing will change and you will simply allow yourself to disappear, so long as it is gradual - so long as you don't have to deal with the hardship of fixing it.
Rather, with accelerationism, you aren't given the choice of avoidance, you are not given the option of letting it happen incrementally, slowly, over a decade.
Its going to happen now. Its got to happen now.
Point being: You say that its a bad thing to try to make this shit happen now, while ignoring that the outcome by all indications is that it will happen later, and later there will be fewer White people, and it will have been EVEN MORE incrementalized to avoid too much disruption, so, basically, you come off as just wanting to be able to kick the can down the road awhile longer… The intention with accelerationism is to not give you that option.
The OTHER layer I see with this, is how do you accomplish accelerationism on the scale required to not only match but defeat the eternal, mythological merchant
Relatively easy, by the look of it.
without becoming exactly what they are but from a different perspective?
You've not demonstrated or elucidated upon any way in which this would transpire, or even what the fuck it means in your mind.
How do you get that genie back in the bottle?
What genie? The genie is the Enemy. Get it back in the bottle? There is no bottle to contain this Enemy, no bottle it will ALLOW itelf to be contained in. That's yet another point of demonstration that you have no fucking grasp as to what is happening around you.
Do we climb in the ovens afterward?
Why would we? Because we got the Enemy to demonstrate its intent, at an earlier, less-incrementalized point? That makes no sense.
We know our fucking nature, how can we guarantee whatever evolves out of its replacement, if built on the same methodologies
built on the same methodologies
Again, what are you even talking about here?
Is it more important to keep honor
To keep honor? Are you insane?
There is no honor in slavery my man. None.
Stand before the ghosts of a 500 million dead European souls and ask the void if your 'honor' matters. The silence is your answer.
The beginnings of this were all honesty & truth
I don't see how anything has changed.
Honesty is getting the Enemy to play their hand before they'd prefer to.
Truth is always Truth, nothing has changed there.
This CAN be won that way.
You don't even seem to have any concept of what is happening around you, let alone how to combat it.
To all the anti-accelerationists out there, I can only ask:
What is your alternative?
The answer, it seems, is always just some variety of "nothing of import, allowing me to kick the can down the road and permit the incrementalization of the same shit accelerationism would bring about sans such incrementalism, but without ME having to deal with the hardships of being forced to choose between enslavement and the temporary struggles of escaping enslavement".