You have to understand natural laws, because natural laws don't care if you accept them. they are fundamental. Death is always coming no matter how you feel about it. Corruption is just a consequence you have to understand, and try to prevent, which is survival. You use the corrupted sense of morality in your head to judge situations beforehand, that makes you vulnerable, that is temptation, that is against your survival instinct. You cannot apply morality to a fundamental law, the law doesn't care, because unlike human nonsense laws, there is no room for interpretations to fundamental barriers of existence. Btw this "room for interpretations" is exactly what the controllers exploit to stand above the human laws.
Survival in groups
Emotional misrepresentation with no evidence in nature. Love is just a mantle term for every circumstance that keeps partners together, but not a "power" on itself that combines. Love doesn't exist.
Survival by maternal instinct
Upping the odds of survival
Survival by adaptation
See. All survival, no morality. Morality in nature is adaptation to situations. Humans added an emotional state, which is once again a lie.
The sum of all things. We were not the first, our ecosystem was already fully established, we were given a fundamental set of rules, and the ability to comprehend the situation.
To fulfill it. Every life form knows this by instinct and acts upon it. Only humans do not, because they are wrestling with their consciousness, were they endlessly make up lies to shirk their responsibility. Why? Because they made an error in the beginning and are know hiding it like a fucking child.
God is a paradox. Humans took something that is already explained and gave it a new meaning, and they did it to hide the old meaning and create new rules. Corrupted rules. The laws of men.
It's a law. The law of existence. It's a set of rules which came to existence by the things it created, because the sum of all those things created an explanation. That is creation in itself, the sum of all things working together to create something new.
The concept of Divinity would not exist without humans, nature came before, and there is not prove of divinity in nature. But infinite amount of evidence for creation. Nature literally owns you and all your creations. You cannot use your consciousness to make up a believe that explains what created you, when there is already evidence that it doesn't. Believe is not evidence, it's an assumption. It's a straw man argument. It's a deflection of truth. It's a jewish trick.
The purpose of existence comes again from the sum of all things in it. The traits, the tools,and the laws, the materials combined create the purpose. No superstition involved. Bacteria understands this, why not you?
Stop mixing up natural law and our ecosystem. One is a set of rules, the other a playing field following these rules. Nobody had the create these rules because they are fundamental, instinctive. Just like soccer…give a bunch of kids a ball and they will start playing with it by instinct. That's the law of nature. The law of men is when somebody makes up a new set of rules and before you know it the sport is so expensive that kids can't afford a ball anymore.