Appropriating Islam

The appropriation of LGBT symbols has show that when something is defined as “far right” the left surrenders it. I think that this can be applied to Islamic symbols and language. Doing this would confuse onlookers as to whether somebody using these symbols and language are actually genuine or just a hardcore shitposter. It could also drive a wedge between the progressive left and Muslims, while at the same time denying them their ability to communicate without referencing these redefined meanings. As I see it, there are two ways to do this: making Islam progressive, and reversing Islamic symbols and language to target actual Muslims with their own hostile statements.

Making Islam Progressive: This was already done with the “Allah is Gay” campaign; however, I think that this could have been taken further. Muslims love new converts, and one way to get them is to lower the barrier to entry. This could be done by making Islam more accessible to other groups though the association of those groups with Islamic symbols. Once Muslims reject this, they can be called out for being regressive and bigoted. This would work really well with Transgenders and Minor Attracted Persons (MAPs, ie: pedos) because these are the new recognized oppressed groups fighting for their “rights”.

Appropriating Islamic Symbols and Language to berate Muslims: This would not only force moderate Muslims to accept that their ideology is hostile to non-Muslims, but it could also cause state, or (((Cultural Authorities))) in the media and academia to try to officially distinguish who are the real Muslims and who aren't. If this happens Alinsky's tactics can then be used to exploit loopholes in their definitions and reduce their legitimacy.

Attached: 945yh3456y394j5u3u.jpeg (780x1170, 45.1K)

Here are some words that could be adopted:

Infidel: This could be turned into a general insult like nigger, faggot, or kike to get it associated with “le ebil nazis”. It can even be used against the progressive allies of Muslims; it would not be incorrect, as most progressive muzbuddies are already not Muslims. Once it becomes another word for SJW people will begin to confuse “moderate” Muslim outbursts with anti-progressive right-wing sentiment.

Apostate: This could be used against the Muslims themselves. We could dispute whether the Quran is the word of god, and if we argue that it isn't, we can consider it idol worship (literally worshipping the book). Then we can claim that these fake Muslims have renounced Allah in a few scraps of paper.

Dhimmi: Like Infidel, this can be used on progressives; it's not false so why not?

Jihad: This can be a dog-whistle for the “Day of the Rope” rhetoric. Once the left picks this up any talk of Jihad from the Linda Sarsour types would be labelled as Fascism.

Attached: 2sdw4e6u596y9ykj0u39452.jpg (720x960, 72.23K)

A two-pronged approach should work here:
First prong: the "Allah is gay" stuff. Push Islam as a gay-friendly religion (for bonus points, discuss the traditional tolerance in Islam for fucking twinks). Demand same-sex marriages in mosques. Push for gay Islam and feminist Islam. This has a couple of benefits. Since homosexuality and feminism are bad for civilizations, we want to push those things in Islam in order to weaken it. And it will make the traditionalist ones chimp out, which will make the incompatibility between Islam and liberal Western values more undeniable than it already is (thereby redpilling the normie against it).
Second prong: say that Muslims are an ally against the Jews. Push the Palestinian solidarity thing really hard. Portray Hitler as a friend of Islam (there's lots of easy to find material on this). For bonus points, push Islam as a pedo-friendly religion and an ally against oppressive age of consent laws. Use Muhammad and Aisha as an example of a positive adult-child relationship. The twink-fucking tradition that I mentioned earlier will come in handy for this too.
Obviously, use different accounts for every idea that you want to push.
Done correctly, we either subvert Islam or associate it with things normies hate. Hopefully both.

the state of whites when they need to act like sand monkeys to win

Our struggle is the most important thing in the world. Every tactic is legitimate as long as it works.

brb gonna sacrifice white babies to moloch for le based 1488

Some Esoteric Hitlerists might already know this, but the Thule Society was founded by a Muslim. I believe his name was Sebbetendorf. The Black Sun symbol comes from Sufism too. The basic theory is that Sufis pre-date Islam, and they constructed that religion for their own aims. It would be pretty easy to construct an Aryan-Islam. Call it Sufi, just because those people tend to be held to such esteem by leftists. It would also be protected from censorship, relative to attempts to do this with Christianity, because Muslims are a protected class. This is best done as two different "denominations." An ultra progressive "Allah is Gay" type, and a super nazi one. That will force actual Muslims to pick one side or the other, and both will serve Zig Forums's agenda.

Is there any backup plans if this thing won't do exactly as planned out to be?

Attached: download.jpeg (217x233, 10.53K)

lmao kys

islam already hates niggers so making it far-right should be easy.