GREENIES BTFO! ELECTRIC CARS WORSE THAN DIESEL ENGINES!
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.fo
en.wikipedia.org
tesla.com
en.wikipedia.org
lpelc.org
archive.fo
cesifo-group.de
twitter.com
Somebody should invent a car that runs on cigarettes.
That'd be so cool.
That study assumes the energy used for manufacture and normal functioning are generated through fossile fuels.
You won't have much sucess arguing with greenies because they also want gas/coal plants shutdown and replaced with solar wind.
Technically, that would lower co2 emissions to near zero.
In practice, it has a whole host of problems, but that's the discussion noone ia having.
You required a study?… Ok.
Someone should invent a car that runs on dead kikes. That'd be way cooler.
...
Most people know this. We're just developing the technology now, so it will be useful later. Nuclear energy + electric cars would probably be the best solution, but liberal faggots don't like nuclear energy.
Vomiting
You cannot go GREEN without going NUCLEAR.
Solar is equally as bad for the pollution created during their manufacture, their horribly conversion rate even at peak efficiency and the damage they can cause without a good sinewave regulator, and don't forget their diminishing returns after just a few years.
Wind is wasteful, with existing wind turbines you have to keep them spinning at all times, so if wind current dies down you have to dump energy into them to keep them form completely siezing, there's still a ton of petroluem to keep the turbine well lubricated, and extremely costly to replace rotor blades that are damaged from flocks of birds flying into them, oh yeah and it fucking kills migratory birds that have been protected by federal law since nixon was president.
We haven't even come close to running out of space for nuclear waste which is safely stored in hollowed out salt mines, by the time the mines are half full the waste already stored should be no more radioactive than uranium ore.
If serious investment goes into thorium reactors with liquid flouride-salt cooling, technology we've had for over 50 years now, we would not only reduce the waste from current reactors but we'd have a fuel source nearly as common as DIRT and SAFE power since the cooling system does not rely on a backup generator to prevent a meltdown.
Back in the 70's I read an article that if you calculated all the expenses of building operating and then decommissioning a nuclear plant and disposing of all the waste the costs outweighed the value of the energy produced. I'm not sure about that though.