ok I'll post topic names and then links addressing it
Forced Confessions - Why Innocent Defendants Admit their "Guilt"
Nuremberg - Fair Trial or Show Trial ?
Do we have evidence of torture to extract confessions?
fact: Torture used to get 'confessions' from Germans
getting the desired 'confession'….via torture
The Value of Testimony and Confessions Concerning the Holocaust
D. Liptadt demolished on another lie: 'No perpetrator of any nationality ever said it didn’t happen'
the misleading 'No Nazi ever denied gas chambers'
"But, but, No Nazi ever Denied"
Torture at Nuremburg:
Pennsylvania judge Edward L. Van Roden:
All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was Standard Operating Procedure with American investigators.
by Judge E. L. van Roden, "American Atrocities in Germany", The Progressive. February 1949, p. 21f.
Judge van Roden's allegation of torture to gain "confessions" is confirmed by Texas Supreme Court Judge, Gordon Simpson. He confirmed that savage beatings, smashing of testicles, and months of solitary confinement occurred.
Congressional Record, appendix. v. 95,sec.12, 3/10/49
US prosecutor Robert Jackson stated on July 26th 1946:
"The Allies are still, technically-speaking, at war with Germany… As a military tribunal, this tribunal represents a continuation of the war efforts of the Allied nations."
US Supreme Court Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone wrote:
"Chief US prosecutor Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg, I don't mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the pretense that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas."
Iowa Supreme Court Justice Charles F. Wennerstrum wrote:
Article 19 of the Nuremberg Charter: