German Ethics Council Expresses Openness To CRISPR

Those Swedish twins that kept getting run over on the highway and barely being even hurt and showing signs of regenerating from the injuries super fast?

There will be more like them.

Super soldiers for the fourth reich.

Anons like me will create this.

youtube.com/watch?v=VTpFWiEx3eo

It can't be stopped. It's in the hands of lone anons with not even very much money to do these things.

He probably be against it.

He tried eugenics so I doubt it.

If you really were, you would already know it doesnt matter.

ah, perfect thread, I was reading this book, and apparently there were already gene tests done on prairy voles, regarding the AVPR1A gene, that was associated with monogamy of sorts. (many variations exists of this gene that make it worse or better even than none of the gene tho), apparently, the right gene will increase vasopressin receptors in certain parts of the brain, making it so that this part of the brain activates with much higher levels, triggering larger changes and enable pair bonding.

But I have been thinking, instead of genocide, cant we just fucking crispr away all the degenerates and their kids with the right genes so they wont become fuckboys or whores? Or doesnt this gene modification work when the human is already formed?

Attached: index.jpg (192x293, 7.53K)

I am by no means any expert in this but all human cells have practically(some differ because of replication errors) the same DNA. Gene modification therefore should take place in every human cell and many "species" of cells are very conservative(that means - they don't replicate much and are protected as much as possible) like eye or brain cells which would make modification of those cells very hard I believe.
On the other hand, maybe it is not necessary to modify every cell in human body but only the ones which produce certain hormones? It would be good if there was someone who actually is working in this field and could give feedback how reasonable it really is. But then again, probably they just cringe away from these treads after reading like 5 posts.

I think their general consensus is "shit is complicated, we have not explored everything, its probably unethical and dangerous to meddle with this crap out in the open"

but if you want to make them cringe less, go to the book threads, learn some stuff, read some more. These researchers still use plain english and often wish to share their opinions with others, as such, you often get very high grade opinions delivered to you through such forms that are not cringe. More of us do that, more of us would come here and seriously talk to us.

As we are winning on other fronts, and it looks like we may have a shot to hold seats in the councils of the future…the issue on how to fix society may arise and come down to questions like this. Nobody wants to do genocide, but if you were to sell state approved crispr kits that say "eat this pill and you will have fewer thoughts of infidelity!" then it could work under the current system, without the need to overhaul everything. Which is always very alluring.

The issue with gene editing everybody into "Aryans" is that even if their looks and IQ are advanced, you can't give them an Aryan soul. That is to say, the numerous obscure genes that make up white subtleties and personalities would not be introduced into a genetically engineered nigger or kike. The essence of white people is something that formed over millennia of evolution, and can be totally lost in a decade.

Are you sure that's how it works?
CRISPR can change the DNA in a zygote, meaning that you can engineer a human before he is born, but once your are a proper multicellular human being you cannot just use CRISPR to change the DNA in every single cell of your body

cant you use other methods for adults tho?