WAS UNCLE TEDDY RIGHT ALL ALONG???
#1 Dependency and Breakdown of the System
Kaczynski wrote, “If the [technological] system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later.”
Today’s world depends on technology for nearly every aspect of business, services, infrastructure and communication. If that system breaks down then the world will come a swift halt. Many predict that it would be chaos, war, famine, disease and the fall of the human race.
#2 Modern Leftism
Kaczynski’s manifesto discussed modern leftism, defining it not as a philosophical view, but a psychological type. He defined modern leftism as having advanced beyond its previous incarnation of socialism.
He concludes that modern leftism is “fragmented and it is not clear who can properly be called a leftist. When we speak of leftists in this article we have in mind mainly socialists, collectivists, ‘politically correct’ types, feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists and the like.”
#3 Political Correctness
Kaczynski discussed who and what political correctness was. He wrote:
“Political correctness has its stronghold among university professors, who have secure employment with comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are heterosexual white males from middle- to upper-middle-class families.”
#4 Abnormal Societal Conditions
In his manifesto, Kaczynski wrote:
“Among the abnormal conditions present in modern industrial society are excessive density of population, isolation of man from nature, excessive rapidity of social change and the breakdown of natural small-scale communities such as the extended family, the village or the tribe.”
WAS UNCLE TEDDY RIGHT ALL ALONG???
WAS UNCLE TEDDY RIGHT ALL ALONG???
Other urls found in this thread:
He's 100% right, especially with how increased industrialization correlates with increased stress levels. People snap to the point of becoming trannies or spree shooters.
Yeah, I have to call uncle this time he was right but you have to admit back then when he wrote it it was kinda loopy sounding, you know? I'm just amazed how far he saw into the future.
truly remarkable, how long has it been?
FBI agents arrested Kaczynski on April 3, 1996
it's always the FBI isn't it?
"Industrial Society and Its Future - The Unabomber's Manifesto"
Man, these kikes are really rattled by those dumb old Polacks for some reason.
W imię Boga za Naszą i Waszą Wolność
Kaczynski was an Jeffersonian democrat with radical tendencies.
He's claims, essentially, that a business economy creates an upside-down pyramid that will always topple down.
An agrarian republic had a valid chance of success before we reached the world powers that we have today
A business economy creates a slave class. People have no ability to leave the workforce because they can't grow their own food and the majority don't have land. It's hard to learn these skills sufficiently enough to survive. Especially with fiat currency, where savings doesn't matter and you need to be an investor just to break even.
Slaves are easy to buy politically. Especially if you espouse "slave rights" and pit them against each other like humans are individuals instead of families.
"Citizens" who don't own land and aren't natural born shouldn't be able to vote.
Nope, shunning technology is not smart.
Watch this and you'll find out why. youtube.com
Read a book.
The true object of his criticism was not technology in itself, but the private ownership of it in the hands of capitalists - think about how much stress could actually be relieved if distribution of resources was decided upon.
His anti-technology stance was dumb in practice; trying to kill leaders of advancement and so on, you can't stop history.
wOw WHAT if FaMiLIES CoUlD CrEAtE tHeiR OwN ReSOuRceS
fuck off communist.
Are you against the idea that maybe your institutions owe you anything for your slavery towards them?
I am against the idea that Institutions should have branches without roots.
They don't owe you anything. Don't work for them. Buy land. Work for yourself.
you are so stupid
you are the kike by being a shill for capitalism you fucking mongrel
What an ignorant slave you are.
Ignore shills, dont reply to shills.
Read the fucking thread you absolute fucking moron.
how about you read this
Imagine the financial concequences of every POS and ATM in America going down for just one day.
Of course he was right you should know this by now.
I'm glad these people are leaving the gene pool.
saw it once as a hurricane survivor.
Grocery stores had food, gas stations had gas, none of them could open with out electricity.
The big grocery stores wouldn't even accept cash because to do so with out their inventory control systems online powered by electricity would have thrown their inventory management into disarray.
This is why there has developed an entire genre of novels devoted to the dreaded EMP attack, which surprisingly, many of their readers are actually hoping for day after day.
top fucking irony, amazing "chutzpah" as usual from your (((kind)))
Fuck off communist.
Capitalism is great precisely because it takes away from the inferior and concentrates everything in the hands of superior and capable people.
What is mine will be mine forever, and never shared with anyone other than my own family.
People must kill more communists.
t. hasn't read Ted
Fuck off commie. Communism is not the panacea for the problems of industrial society. Regardless of the mode of production the problems with the current technological state-of-affairs would remain (i.e. the fact that we are now living in conditions vastly different from those we evolved under, excessive population density, the breakdown of natural small-scale communities, rapid social change, atomization, stress, the disruption of the power-process and the fact that all of these conditions are imposed on the modern man by other people whose decision he is unable to influence at all). Communism would be even worse than capitalism in preserving human freedom. Both systems need to regulate human behavior to function. Modern tech, regardless of the character of the system, will lead to the diminution of human freedom and the increasing control of human behavior. Seeing how Judaeo-communism butchered 100,000,000 people in less than a century and still got BTFO by capitalism, I don't think it is the solution either. All of this is why we call capitalism and communism two sides of the same shekel. Both are supported by technophile anti-human scum
yeah ok, what are you going to share with your family when everything is owned by a handful of superior people. you cuck, it will at their mercy and from their hand that anything is shared with them, now suck my dick pleb.
Look at when the Federal Reserve was created and when the Fraternal Brotherhood of Investigation was created. (Kikes own banks which they need masons to watch.)
Was Uncle T right? You’re fucking a right he was right. He’s do for a springing soon too
Number one on the list faggots
That so-called disease is a DSM checklist for being too smart and too honest.
Knew some (((Ukranians))) that told me the holomodor was simply an error in the planning department. They also had Che Guevera shit in their house, so commie as well.
Commies will never fit in here you degenerate retard. You aren't smart enough to decide which resources go to whom. Life is organic and organic systems of civilization are required. Your idiotic 18th century ideology does not suffice and it never will.
Go starve in Venezuela.
Ted was bang on about leftists weakening society and universities. I don't think he understood the Cultural Marxist/ USSR subversion program and why would he pre Internet? A smart man or woman should always be heard lest they advance good even after they do bad.
Those sound like philorussian kikes, not Ukrainians.
A real Ukrainian would never defend the Holodomor.