I agree with you on this point, although I believe it came out later that Leuchter did not have the credentials he at first claimed. Regardless I have read the report and believed it didn't happen before even doing so, so it really doesn't matter. I mentioned I was not referring to gas chambers in the OP.
Functionalism VS Intentionalism
Yes, I have hope for the future due to information contrary to the popular narrative being so readily available online and as these events get further and further into the past they will cease to have the kikes desired effects.
My point stands, this is like asking if Trump is aware of every such thing in every government facility everywhere in the country. It has no bearing.
How could Hitler not be aware of the fact that harsh conditions were causing large numbers of deaths when that was the condition in the entire country?
Again, these are somewhat pointless questions.
If you're getting down into the nitty gritty of "did hitler know anything of what was going on", you're already head-first down the rabbit hole.
Face it bud: Most people, normalfags, don't follow ideas, they don't follow reason, they follow POWER AND STRENGTH.
You aren't to reason them out of this sort of propaganda, because they weren't reasoned into it - an authority told them it was so and they believed it without really caring about it, and now the powers that appear to espouse strength and power promote it as fact and attack anyone who goes against that paradigm. Hence, they go with it.
Strong horse, weak horse, etc etc.
These things occurred before the overall condition in the Reich reached such equally dire conditions. I suppose we will just have to agree to disagree in these regards.
That will certainly be a factor, but a greater factor will be the rise of political factions espousing strength and, eventually, power, which dismiss it outright or engage in aggressive revisionism of the standard narrative.
Also a factor, but frankly, a large factor IMHO is the consequences of these events having their desired impact - they have created an environment wherein younger people not only don't give a shit, they have no respect for the authorities telling them its so. They don't appear all that powerful or strong - they appear weak and effeminate. Why trust them?
I remember my teachers for history, most of them were men, and now that i think of it, all of them were former military participants. These days, it seems likely you'll be getting these narratives from some kind of soyboy or catlady shilling this shit at you, and it'll be mixed in with discussing homos being normalized and other such tripe, which just cheapens the whole functionality of it as a methodology.
The consequences of these narratives being in place are create environs, and individuals derivative therefrom, which eliminate the functional capacity of these narrative to be pushed effectively.
Which things? Be specific and provide some backing to your claims or don't make claims in such vein.
I refuse to agree to that. My point stands unanswered: You are getting into the rationale behind whether or not Hitler knew of the many things happening in these camps, and its the same as asking if Trump is fully aware of every single fucking happenstance event or pattern emergent within these camps, and that's highly unlikely - nor is it really relevant, especially when you aren't providing any evidence of the events you claim transpired to begin with.
If you want to get into such narratives, you're going to have to set a narrative tone to back the discussion, otherwise its just comes off as you coming in and nitpicking some pointless fucking ephemeral question while embracing the overarching standard narrative of the Holohoax itself.
A much better line of inquiry, now that I think on it, would be if the American political figures post-WW2 were aware of the conditions in the German POW internment camps.
The diary of General Patton provides some insight in this capacity suggesting that they certainly were, and that it was a conscious decision in terms of action.
I agree, this absolutely is a good question and those camps we're atrocious. There was one well known Jew who wrote a book later (can't recall the name at the moment) about how he worked in one of these camps and his favorite past time was beating German POWs to death with an axe handle.
(Heil'd)
I would argue that the analogy doesn't really work here as the treatment I described seemed to be ubiquitous across most camps and the numbers of deaths were much higher than some isolated prison guard beating the shit out of a nigger in an American prison. I want to make it clear again that I do not endorse the mainstream Holocaust narrative but I also do not simply plug my ears and stomp my feet and say 'nothing ever happened at all' because the historical record just doesn't support this. I simply find the functionalist vs Intentionalist debate is interesting from my position outside looking in, as I certainly don't agree with the main crux of it as a whole. The question in my mind is was The Führer aware of these conditions in these camps. He certainly called for their internment in camps and ghettos and their use as forced labor where many were worked to death (and don't get me wrong, I believe rightfully so) Did he just leave it to his administrators and didn't really give a shit how they were treated and if some died well they deserved it anyway? Or did he specifically know or even ordered their treatment to be done in this fashion? That's all.
I feel debating it with you is probably futile however as you already have your mind made up and that's fine. In fact I concede that I could be totally wrong on all this. It's the question and debate by historians that intrigues me.
Duh, nigger. Who do you think ordered care packages from civilians to be stolen? And why do you think it's illegal to dig a hole in the Rhineland even today?
There was a shitload of POW's handed over to Stalin and some of those guys did 10 years in the Gulag, could you imagine? No that's impossible for us