Let's look at pre-1789 world

There is no perfect society on Earth, but a bad king means it's divine right for his subjects to rise against him and make new kings. This is divine law of conquest.

Saying you = the people has no meat to it, it's trying to trick people that you speak for the mass or that you woe the mass.

I lead the mass, I'm not the mass.

What is the "greater community" if not the mass?
And who will speak for the nation?

A monarch is probably going to care more about fellow aristocrats than ignorant swarthy peasants. There's nothing wrong with that.

Love when this principled third positionist board decides they're libtards at one moment or the other.

People naturally follow that which convinces them the most; thus, jews must use White proxies to enact their political will, since jewish physiognomy instinctually elicits disgust and pity.

The only thing I have against medieval monarchies is their usage of jewish merchants and advisors.

What is the "people" here, a mass of human beings?

A mass of human beings are pretty prone on making bad decisions.

That's exactly what happened and that's why we are where we are politically.
Bad monarchs create the conditions for communism to seem like a good idea and take over and I really, really don't want that.


And this is why the French revolution happened.


It is liberals who don't care about the people.

As shown by EXISTING monarchies like Bhutan, I wouldn't say its subjects are any dumber than a western "citizen".

We are here because we want to restore the old society and including the old political system because the new ones aren't as good.
And? There's no perfect society that can ensure communism cannot take over forever.
The french revolution happened because the monarch was not effective.
What is the "people"?

Since this is basically an anti-French Revolution thread, let's post this quality cartoon by French cartoonist Caran d'Ache.

"French revolution: before and after: satirical drawing by French draftsman Caran d'Ache, 1898, in the middle of the Dreyfus affair and the foundation of Action Française. Although the Ancien Régime is not shown as idyllic, the contemporary situation is shown as an increase of oppression, which technical improvements (notice the plowshare) don't lighten, and to which financial capitalism (the banker with his top hat and his wallet), the Freemason (with his set square and plumb bob) and the Jew (with a curved nose) are contributors."

Attached: 250px-Caran_Dache.gif (250x317, 44.21K)

The funny thing that all it takes is a good king to prevent the french revolution.

The same for the October revolution.

Authority was not maintained.