metapedia has a lot of "some argue" and too little of an emphasis on sources or citations.
getting rid of the former and strengthening requirements for the latter will keep external editors from fucking it up as much.
Zig Forums needs to create a wiki
Andrew Wright
Austin Howard
Zig Forums isn't one single person
Anyone telling others that X is what "we" collectively believe in is most likely a D/C shill.
Joshua Flores
Fair point, but you cannot deny that there are things that most Zig Forumsacks share in common, and that these are the things that make the Zig Forums community, they are Zig Forums.
A community is created from the things that are shared in common among it's members, to say that Zig Forums doesn't believe in anything is to say that Zig Forums does not exist at all.
Not all whites may observe it, but there is a culture most whites practice and it is mostly unique to whites. Uniformity is not a requirement, just general conformity, and it need not be in all areas, but there will be aspects most commonly found among the members.
That's all I'm getting at, a representation of the majority of Zig Forums, the general profile of the average Zig Forumsack.
Ryder Scott
this is not something that completely rules out change and enforces complete conformity, the wiki represents the majority of the beliefs in each area as held by the majority of Zig Forums's anons.
There will be anons who do not subscribe to all of the beliefs that are held by the majority of anons in all areas, but chances are that most will adhere to agreement in at least one area, as the general consensus changes, the wiki changes to reflect that, dissent is good and will be treated as such, it shall be recognized by the wiki, and will not be condemned - for it may became it's future.
no dogma, but a good representation, that is the goal.
so no d+c here.
Jaxon Ramirez
This, divide/conquer shills keep saying "(((we))) don't believe Hispanics are white"
John Ramirez
It doesn't matter where you were born, if you are of pure (unmixed) European descent, you are White.
If you are referring to those brown motherfuckers the FBI classifies as "White" who are trying to flood the southern border, then no, they are not White, they are fucking Mestizos.
I recognize that there are Spanish-speaking and Portuguese-speaking Whites in Central and South America, they are White and our brothers.
But those mixed with the indigenous people of Central or South America are not White, and should never be thought of in that way.
There is a similar problem with (((governments))) defining Arabs as being White as well, they are not, and should not be considered White, however, there are Whites that live in the Middle-East, West and Central Asia, and in North Africa, they are White and our brothers, but the Arabs they live among are not and will never be considered White.
Adam Clark
Great post lad, thank you. I did a update of the original image to help with neural network training.
William Nguyen
In short, White is genetic, not linked to where you live, or who you live among, if you are in the same Genetic grouping as the indigenous peoples of Europe, you are White, this means that Slavs are White as well.
BTW, I am, aware that Arabs are not the original inhabitants of the Middle East and North Africa, that the original inhabitants were Whites, and that the Whites of the modern Arab world are their descendants.
We might also look into the Solutreans and other such cases where Whites were the original inhabitants of lands they lost to non-Whites, and the invaders are now referred to as the natives of those areas.
Kevin Thomas
10/10.
Nicholas Rogers
DEATH TO ISRAEL!