No, they don't, there's no historical record that say romans killed all jews.
Interested in some greek and russian saints prophecies?
Oliver Foster
Alexander Brooks
wow
sounds like absolute drivel tbh
Brody Jenkins
There is no doubt at all that thousands of Hebrew documents were destroyed at this time in these dark days of Hebrew history (c. A.D. 66-72), thus leaving the scattered Dispersion of Jewish people (cf. 1 Peter 1:1), with virtually no genealogical documentation—should someone appear claiming to have messianic authenticity. The argument in McClintock & Strong thus remains unscathed; and the assertion that the Jews had no use for written genealogical documents stands exposed as a desperate theory, utterly void of support.
tl.dr. In order to be a jew, you need to prove lineage.
Chase Wilson
The new testament is based off of the old testament. The part you're referencing was added way later and is often claimed to be words Jesus spoke. However, Jesus never said "synagogue of Satan" John claimed to have it revealed to him by an angel and the angel told him that is what Jesus would say.
Grayson Richardson
Or you can test a DNA test.
Parker Morris
Let me explain the theory a bit.
If you can only be a jew if you prove lineage, then the last jew was Jesus.
Now Jesus broke the old covenant and replaced it the the new (Christianity).
After the death and resurrection of Christ, the jews and their lineage were destroyed by the romans along with their temple.
Fast forward 1000 years and you have the ashkenazi jew with no proof of lineage other than their own which is maternal by the way and not paternal as by the old law.
Grayson Rodriguez
Brayden Edwards
oh and this:
en.wikipedia.org
they have more claim because they can prove continuity.
Aiden Wright
Is moarpheus back?
Look at the actual conclusion of that.
It just means jews were marrying shiksha and give birth to ashkenazi.
Thomas Flores
I have no argument that. Leave jews to take care of nigger jews.