The Heroes of Fascism

...

The Satanic Panic is overblown tbh. A person of strong character who worships a rotting shoe on a telephone pole is worth more than a person of weak character adhering to a more mainstream, less "2sp000ky4me" religion. Blood above all.

Someone spent a lot of time making that picture.
In order to associate controlled opposition at the lower tier, with those on the higher ones.
TRS?Vice?Rebel?FBI?

Kill yourself.

This single sentence shows you are clueless. Timmy used ANFO, there is no external already made "explosive" involved, other than sticks of tovex as accelerant, which they stole from a mine. Rest of it is completely homemade, anyone with enough fertilizer can cook up that stuff at home. Breivik used same thing as far as I know. Nichols is notorious for changing what he said repeatedly and contradicting himself - the quote about Timmy stealing the tovex is from him as well, from his latest interview too.
That was only one of the targets McVeigh contemplated. He picked Murray because of many reasons afterwards, it's strange you didn't read about something this elementary. It also annuls your point about no ATF victims, nevermind the fact that majority of the victims were from one agency or another.

Here's an explanation from Dr Pierce,one of those listed as a hero of "Fascism", of the key differences between National Socialism and Fascism. This quote is from "White Power" the magazine of the NSWPP.

Q: Liberals often refer to National Socialists as “fascists.” Are they correct in this practice?

A: Liberals apply the label “fascist” to anyone whose ideas they find abhorrent or dangerous — even conservatives. They tend to use this term as a smear word, not restricting it to the adherents of any specific ideology. Thus, they probably feel as justified in trying to smear us with the label “fascist” as any other of their opponents.

Q: Well, is it proper for National Socialists to refer to themselves as “fascists?”

A: Certainly not. When we use the term we are virtually always referring to the adherents of the specific social-political doctrine on which Benito Mussolini founded his governmental system in Italy — that is Fascist with a capital “F.” Although it may not seem important to the liberal, there is a profound difference between National Socialism and Fascism.

Q: But I thought that both Fascism and National Socialism were highly centralized, authoritarian and strongly nationalistic forms of government, with only slight differences between the ways they operated.
A: You have been reading too many textbooks written by liberals. Certainly the Fascist state and the National Socialist movement are authoritarian, and they both have a strong social basis. Furthermore, both Adolf Hitler’s National Socialist government and Mussolini’s Fascist government administered most of their programs for national and social renewal on a centralized, nationwide basis. Both governments brought forth immense popular enthusiasm, which was manifested in numerous public demonstrations and celebrations. All these things contributed to a seeming similarity. But the differences betwen the two systems are by no means slight!

Q: What are some of these differences?

Mussolini Time 1A: The really fundamental difference lies in the role of the state and the race under each system.

In Mussolini’s word’s:

“The Fascist conception of the state is all-embracing: outside of it no human or spiritual values can exist, much less have any real worth. Thus understood, Fascism is totalitarian, and the Fascist state — a synthesis and a unit of all values — interprets, develops and potentiates the whole life of a people…It is not the nation that generates the state…Rather it is the state which creates the nation, conferring volition and, therefore, real life on a people…In the Fascist conception, the state is an absolute before which individuals and groups are relative…”

To the National Socialist, on the other hand, it is our Race, not the state, which is all-important. In Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler wrote:
“The state is a means to an end. Its end lies in the preservation and advancement of a community of physically and spiritually similar creatures… States which do not serve this purpose are misbegotten monstrosities in fact.” (II:2)

There are many important consequences of this basic difference in attitudes. For example, under Fascism anyone, regardless of racial background can be a citizen, as long as he accepts his responsibility to the state. Under National Socialism, on the other hand, membership in the racial community is the first requirement of citizenship

You guys need to realize that IM developed a definition of "Fascism" that was separate from the Italian state's definition. They utilize the term as an overarching worldview that encompassed the spirit of the era. They saw Mussolini's Fascism as an extension and expression of the Italian spirit, whereas National Socialism was that Germanic counterpart.
When you see IM information you need to realize that they had dug deep into the likes of Evola and began viewing things through a scope of Perennial philosophy. They defining FEATURES of Italian Fascism and German National Socialism are not what they're comparing, but rather the Aryan expression behind either as being one and the same.
Italian Fascism =/= German National Socialism
but Fascist = National Socialist when referring to IM stuff. And they were hugely Hitlerites by all definitions and would definitely hold him higher than Mussolini in almost all regards. Hitler was the manifestation of absolute racial consciousness as far as the esoteric nature of their worldview went.

Attached: FYlBQOX.png (1000x938, 602.94K)

Or listen to the book here

Those white traitors were no worse than literally ANY other white traitors. You kikes-slaves are just upset that SOME of us here actually did our homework. His manifesto was 100% pro-Zionism, anti-National Socialism. He also said he didn't care what RACE anybody was, and that ANYBODY was welcome in Europe as long as they were anti-Communist and anti-Islam! He was PRO-diversity, PRO-Jew, PRO-Capitalism. So gas yourself for your lies!
As it happened, real NS supporters like (the band) Saga and her friends were finding and spreading around news articles and eyewitness statements swearing that Breivik was a Zionist. And the kids he shot up, do you know what they were protesting that VERY day? They were supporting Palestinian rights in Israel, you fucking Shabboos goy! Only a ZIONIST would have a problem with that!
I'd show you the articles they collected but SOMEONE has 404ed them all. And only 1 was archived, but I will not share that one because it was posted on someone's blog.

Well Iron March and AWD were affiliated which is what I was trying to highlight, not necessarily that they were the same exact group. Probably should've been clearer