Dear Zig Forums let's imagine the most ideal political system to live in

what is that says mgs? could it be a pepe frog with bare feet. the corridor flickered with flourescent light

1) That's just some random image of Utopia
2) Polarized glass facades in that sunny environment would not be a problem. And with a layer of organic fotovoltaics woud be even useful to produce certain amount of electric current.
3) Flying cars can run on kerosine but it's too much work. And while I love my motor revving up I still think that the concept is ancient by now and we should consider using something else.

4) Hydrogen works on the same concept. And while it is clean I'd still prefer humanity to switch to something that produces less heat long-term.

5) yeah, yeah, yeah. We get it. You have cosmetic preferences. We're talking about a working system. Your cosmetic details will sort themselves out on their own.

Folk culture should be preserved as a cultural heritage. Dancing is meant to be part of the curriculum since it's beneficial for human health, together with other sports.

- not to forget: Dancing looks good. So do martial arts.

Modern culture is something that in some places would be called "Quickly fermented". Ergo it's a quick and dirty way of making things. That's not how to build a long-term society. That's just creating semi-functional crap that _will_ break down later unless done properly.

plap plap. the plapping stopped. pepe pulled out a rainbow wig and snow goggles. he was carrying an mp40.

Attached: 1369451d9f3a27b6a6a835cb03a509ba88a2fef0f8d0319266281094ffd5f1a4.jpg (1048x590, 1.13M)

Halfway around writing a book related to this matter.

I agree with agriculture, but livestock (aside from beast of burden or some ecological reason) are unnecessary because you can get proteins AND UMAMI from plants.

Agree, but you're making a huge mistake by trying to start in a centralized manner. You are asking for subversive forces to "poison the well".

All you need is Roman/Inca level economy applied to communities only. Taxation still plays a role, but it's to homogenize and control the population. In turn, you don't need laws aside from simple ones because these communities will police themselves.

A child can learn from their father and mother.

Ama yuya, ama sua, ama kiya, ama sipix, ama makya… don't lie, don't steal, don't be lazy, don't kill, don't be effeminate (or degenerate).
You raise your hand when you greet your neighbor, each finger represents each law.

some problems with the last part already. you assume too much about social traits.

The fact that geopolitics exists debunks your post. Maybe you haven't been through puberty, but being born in the early 90s, I seen people jump from flaming buildings before 9/11. I seen people fight for their independence in a single room until half of them laid dead. And saw government try to deal with terrorism while whores from the UN screamed for human rights in defense of rapists and killers.

Once a stable state society is reached, it should last indefinitely… until external factors bring it to an end. Societies that last 50,000 years are possible, but by then the natural human lifespans can exceed 1000 years, and that's the trick: the lifespan of a society is relative to the (natural, unaugmented…) lifespan of its constituency.

Stable state societies have some things in common.
1. They are closed societies, with limited fresh blood. Stable state societies develop a unique culture, the nuances of which take lifetimes to fully learn. There are measures taken to limit immigration to the few truly new deserving souls.
2. As a corollary to the above, stable state societies are mono-ethnic. This isn't an expression of 'racism' or hatred, but rather a knowledge that the body and the mind are inextricably intertwined.
3. The leadership of stable state societies are comprised of the wisest souls, not the most aggressive ones. The wisest souls tend to highly intelligent, emotionally mature, steady stewards who care more about the well-being of their fellow man than about their own status in society. Because of that, such people have to be sought out and appointed, rather than relying upon democratic processes to determine leadership.
4. Stable state societies ever actively evolve their constituents towards a better state of being, but gently. Joining a stable state society is like merging onto a highway of self-development, one which you may never have to get off.
5. Stable-state societies are scientifically and technologically advanced. The level of technological development in a society corresponds directly with degree of spiritual/personal development. Wiser souls tend to incarnate in more advanced societies. Souls are careful about when and where they incarnate. This correspondence is pretty tight.

While most people on Planet Earth are not yet ready to live in a stable state society, a small number of souls (30,000-300,000 max.) incarnating here have been around the merry-go-round enough times to genuinely want to try something less exciting. By extension, stable state societies can be seen as boring by those not so oriented.

Societies that are less-than stable-state in some manner inevitably fail, and new systems of group-organization arise to take their place.

Attached: plucked pic 06.jpg (3086x2132, 1.53M)

The last part was an actual historical example. That's how the Incas greeted each other… and yes I'm aware of the "three finger" version, but it's wrong.

you fucked up already op
what's good agriculture and live stock without good farmers?
what's clean water without men able and honest of the job?
tech without smart and loyal men? education without good teachers?
a good civilization requires good and civilized people, which means to forcibly deny and remove anyone who falls short of that standard

Attached: john-ruskin-writer-better-the-rudest-work-that-tells-a-story-or.jpg (700x700, 75.65K)

Electromagnetic transport won't stop your wife from being a whore. Infidelity should be met with the death penalty.

See here's the problem with this line of thinking which is something that other user's have hinted at in this thread but not quite nailed down. It's the people that make government work or not work. It is not the government (or political system if you prefer) that makes people work. You could have the best government ever conceived of but if the people running it are all selfish, violent, retards it won't work. Any organization of people must first and foremost be centered around the idea of producing quality people to run society. This is what lies at the heart of Nazi thinking. It is why so much emphasis is placed on race. If you look at successful societies throughout history you will see that their political systems varied greatly but what tends to run true through all of them is that when the were great it was because the people themselves were healthy and ever striving to better themselves. Once that gets taken out of the equation; once people start to settle for mediocrity and tolerate the presence of inferior people they begin to decay. And to clarify inferiority is more than just intelligence, it can be a gradual weakening of character and the moral principals of the people.

Long story short. Quality people generally know how to run and maintain a society. What dooms any society is an over abundance of low quality people. Therefore any working or lasting political system must first and foremost at it's core revolve around the notion that it's fundamental purpose is to produce quality people and put them in positions of power.

Attached: 1392612681429.jpg (400x518, 88.92K)

No, their tits need to be severed and then send to the husband as a intermediate satisfactory tool unitl the next boobcow is given to him.

You can have the smartest people working inside the government if the strongest variables are still the same it all means jackshit, infact it makes lifequality more miserable for average joe in an exponential manner. Low geared exponential manner.

If you cannot comprehend my post please do not misinterpret it with your projected idiocy.

Graviton.

If it exists we maybe able to find another particle that repels it.

Exactly!
While some FAUSTIAN "nobility" might be necessary to keep things running, the people are first. They need (from within their communities) the infrastructure to create REAL houses for each family and to have farms. Aside from this, home self-defense should be necessary and even imposed (to lessen military training).

You need to subdue your neighbors, and either absorb them nicely or by force. Then you ensure their descendants dilute themselves (genetically and culturally) into your culture in as little as one generation. Regarding rampant nepotism, the Inca had a good idea by passing their wealth to some religious third party; this outsourced degeneracy to another smaller group, and forced the Inca ruling class to expand.

I didnt even read your post.

Only chunks of it.

Elective Monarchy via anonymous votes from a Senate. The Monarch rules for life but can be impeached by a 60% majority.

A secret police will be established for the sole purpose of spying on the Monarch and the Senators, they will be used to root out corruption. They will be called the Audit Organization, to avoid would-be corruption to them by grandiosity of titles. They will swear an oath to uphold the law and follow the rules by penalty of death for any misdoings that can be proven with guilt.

Each male citizen will be educated in the matters of reason and philosophy, and will be forced to undergo at least 2 years of mandatory military service. In this they will all take an oath to assassinate the members of government if they are found with overwhelming evidence to be guilty of corruption, lest they be cursed in the afterlife.

All people will be taught to be vigilantes when others have committed crimes and are not punished. Of course, there will be some crazies that will use this and abuse it, but that's inevitable.

The society will follow the Christian faith, but the greatest sins will be considered pride and lust for power. These are the two that have plagued modern society and led it to it's current state. Man's lust for power knows no bounds.

The school system will be martial to a T, and focused highly on discipline and order, to ensure that people know exactly when to enforce judgment lawfully on others.

Women will be taught writing and mathematics, but most importantly cooking, housekeeping, and mothering. They will be considered a cornerstone of the family, but will be taught to always be submissive before their husbands. Women or Men found guilty of adultery will be publicly executed on live television every Sunday. They will be disposed of in unmarked graves unless the husband wishes otherwise.

The culture will be one of uniformity. People will be allowed to express themselves as they wish but it must be drilled into their brains that they are "X"ian. Thoughts of separatism will be suppressed to the full extent of the law, and will be considered a great sin for weakening the unity of the realm, country, and the people.

This system, like all systems will eventually collapse, as no government form is perfect for imperfect humans. Corruption will still gradually find it's way it, but this would be in the hopes to delay it.

Are you sniffing glue on a daily basis? The rest of your comments make even less sense. Enjoy writing that book of yours; just another one for the burning pyres.
Sage for terrible thread filled with dumb untermensch.

Exactly. Society also needs constant land reforms, as Rome did for a time, to prevent the culmination and centralizing of power into a few key figures.

But the challenge of preventing Caesars and Pompeii's from working together to centralize power seems impossible. It seems to be the eternal problem.

Pompey*

fuck

This
/thread

There's your problem right there newfag. Lurk 2 more years.

You are an Ayy Lmao. I can tell

I read the chunks and then filled in the blanks.

Tribal thinking -> tribe -> Centralisation only on a smaller scale.

WTF???

Are you some kind of very special idiot?

Livestock is also useful for fermenting fields. And proteins from plants are often different proteins than protein from livestock. It's more energy-consuming to build complicated proteins. Human body doesn't like to do that much. That's why proteins themselves are taken apart [ think of Lego blocks ] and rebuilt into different proteins.

Now I fully agree that humanity should consume a lot less meat in general [ there are many health benefits ], but I don't agree with going full vegan. Let's say 50% vegan, provided India can teach the rest of the world how to grow proper spices.

But unless there's a good health reason, people below 25 years of should not go full vegetarian to ensure proper development.

I'm not trying to create a monolith. Those never work long-term. But certain coordination is necessary. Therefore either decentralized units talk to each other openly and cooperate or there will have to be a centralized coordination created [ I'd very much like to avoid this scenario, tbh. People on positions like this get corrupted easily ].

Taxation to a degree is necessary because you need to be able to provide people working in "government services" have to have incentive to do their job well. Fuzzy feelings are great, but they won't feed your family.

The main problem with "self-policing" is mob rule. Detailed laws are there so that you don't have arguments about precedence /ergo: precedence will not be taken into consideration as a decisive factor/.

Not if their father and mother didn't study university and the child is a gifted one. This is a fairly marginal part of population, but very important one to keep humanity advancing further.

Yes, wonderful. But not practical. The majority of population sticks to said rules because that way of life is simply more comfy. But that doesn't matter that a few wouldn't lie, steal, cheat or kill. And the more gullible people get, the easier it is to cheat them. So while this is a nice greeting, it's also very important that you have a way to find out about lawbreakers.

Summed it up well.

to be continued

Mass immigration is not a normal phenomenon. It usually follows great conflict, famine, pandemics,… These don't just happen. And most people don't want to migrate, because home is home. But yes, that is to be taken into consideration. My suggestion would be to have a buffer zone for such occasions to be able to help in the case of a crisis and also be able to keep the citizens safe.

Not entirely true. It just looks that way from a certain point of view. Take a look at European cities and villages. From outside and far away they may seem "mono-ethnic" but they are not. It's just the differences among the people are indistinguishable to outsiders.

This shows that you've never been in a managerial position. Most of your points here sounds great, but are mostly incorrect.

Only as long as the circumstances allow it.

No. This one is entirely dreamt up. Human tech-evolution is mandated by overcoming adversities. To make things easier, to gain profit in a more simple manner while spending as little resources as possible.

The bigger the natural adversity, the more strongly is the society knit together. Look at Japan, northern Sweden, Norway, …
The closer knit society means less crime because people realize that to survive they need to keep good relationships with others. That translates into a good society in a generation or two. Because people who don't, die. With their whole families.

Well, we're working from bottom up. We first figure out the basic needs, then we can build on top of that and at the end we can look for best people for the job. You can't do it your way, since it would break the system very soon.

Yes. And you're saying that you can determine the quality of a person by the colour of their skin because you've seen someone of a certain skin colour who didn't fit the criteria.

I'm saying ignore things that we are born with and concentrate on which skills and how well a person has honed and give them responsibility based on meritocracy.

This kind of expansionist policy is counter productive long-term. Might be good for a short-term gain, but is definitely to be abandoned at a later date. Once your land becomes too big, it's impossible to govern. The granularity of decentralization would be in a constant flux and each and every new acquisition might break your country.

I'll have to get back to you, since I spend a lot of tie writing this.

Kek

You don't start building a house on the details, you start with the foundation.

And there's that same stupidity repeated. Yea let's just ignore foundation issues and just start putting up the blinds first.

Kill all niggers.
Niggers aren't a race, they are a plague sent by the Jewish god.

It's about meritocracy. I don't care what skin colour you have. It's about how much you can contribute to society. Ergo meritocracy is the foundation.

you can't just ignore human nature, user
not everybody acts like you

that's not a foundation you nigger, a foundation is a government structure and an economic system. A meritocracy can be embedded but depending on the government structure, it can easily be subverted destroying the entire system. Hell, since you're so fond of a meritocracy, please define what constitutes "merit".

The single most important thing that the government can have is capable people. A dumb, diseased, and pacified people will do no good. This will allow the inevitable opportunists to claw their way into power and wrest control from the people. Then it's the same cycle, they fight for power, civil war occurs, a victor wins, the system is shaken, sometimes they split into individual states off their namesake. We don't want that.

We want people educated in history, not just telling them about the events but WHY they happened and WHY they should be avoided.

A eugenics system will be implemented, this is the most important thing for the future of our society. People with genetic diseases will be forcibly sterilized. There will be large government incentives for highly intelligent, mentally fit people to breed, while the unintelligent will receive none. Hiding diseases will bear harsh penalties, and hiding these diseases and reproducing will result in the death penalty. Genetic editing will experimented with as a means to increase the intelligence, physical fitness, and wisdom of the populace.

The prison system will be nonexistent. Lesser crime will be put into two categories. Crimes of emotion and crimes of premeditation. Crimes of emotion will be punished by community service. Crimes of premeditation will be punished by hard labor. For greater crimes, punishments will be harsh and permanent. Thievery will result in losing a hand. Bribery, fraud, blackmail, murder, rape, etc. will be punished with public execution.

All of these things will be codified in a law similar to the constitution, and will require a unanimous vote to repeal.

In a government environment it means sensibility, knowledge and intelligence. So how does that surface: it surfaces by prediction and coherence of arguments but not in a strawmen, ad hominem fallacy hurling kind of way, mostly done by experience that hones that skills.

You're a nigger as well.

Too much of a monolith, works only on small areas. Not viable for anything except city states.

Ever heard of CIA?

No. You have to distinguish between people's abilities and stop this semi-communist crap about how everyone is equal. While people may be equal under the law, they are very rarely equal in terms of ability. Your suggestion would throttle gifted ones and overload less gifted people. It's about finding the right peg for the right hole.

No centralized religion. You may pray to whatever you want in your private time.

Again: Differences in aptitude. While I agree that physical prowess needs to be a part of the curriculum, you can't expect everyone to fit this image 100%. There are people who spend more time studying and don't have the physique but have very useful brains.

Cooking and houskeeping are skills that everyone should learn. The differentiation is based on aptitudes. Most women will naturally incline to be mothers. I don't see a reason to do the same thing that 3rd wave feminists are doing only with slightly different agenda.

What I do believe is necessary is to provide opportunities for women to be able to be a work-at-home-mom. Therefore a household would need to be able to function properly on a single income.

This is a dangerous thing. Yes, I agree it's important, but I don't think the way you wrote it would be acceptable purely on the contrary human behaviour.

Entropy. Yes. Good, strong men make good times, good times make weak men, weak men create hard times.

But there is a way to prevent this: Games that foster certain skills and mindsets to stop or at least slow down the deterioration in population might be very helpful.

would you take gay blood donors? immigrants from countries with average 80iq? racial groups that make up 80% crime in your country?
there's a reason these people don't have a civilization of their own, and that you would waste any resources entertaining their worth to your civilization is a demonstration of a fundamental failure to understand the basis of any species - to produce and protect one's own kin

Fuck off faggot.

Nah. Ether such people would not be admitted or we'll have to build a new Australia.

white brown black green or yellow
haha or purple or blue haha it doesn't matter haha lol or if you are gold with speckled on top haha lol we're all one colour, the human colour haha, everyone's the same, haha, all countries in the world are the same lol haha, it doesn't matter if you are a 55 iq pygmy or a german with 170 iq haha, the only thing that really matters is the workers, the bourgeoisie, reactionaries and trannies!!!!

Also: What's the problem with Gay blood donors as long as they are clean? There are blood tests for that.

(checked)

the thread is /trannypol/. they only exist as a parasite leeching off Zig Forums, even their name, their whole existence.
they go on here, start a bait thread, so they can return to their tranny filled cesspit and say "lol Zig Forums likes to claim it cares about politics but I went there and said no race and they all started talking about race!!", and the other trannies all dilate in celebration.

No, we are not "the human colour". There are biological differences. But I don't believe in simply kicking out a bunch of people because of skin colour if they can be useful.

Naturally, if a person is not useful, they will be asked to either improve or we'll send them to New Australia or Canada.

So something along the lines of Sir Oswald Mosley?

You still haven't defined what constitutes merit.

I'm not familiar with his work or ideas, so I can't agree or disagree.

quality post.
The people are the country and the country is the people.
Put a bunch of niggers and arabs in Sweden and it turns into the rape capital of the world, when before it had been at the height of civilisation with almost no crime.
I can only hope that op is chased down by a pack of rabid niggers and chopped into pieces with blunt machetes.

Probably how severe one's AIDS are, since OP is an insufferable faggot.

Of course you don't know who Mosley is. Go back to trannypol you fucking faggot.

Attached: 65163459_2429595427096615_3403002931941736448_n.jpg (480x640, 40.57K)

Merit in this thread is when you are producing something that is valued by other people. Be it a service, producing goods or something along the lines of R&D or even art, if the society gets to a level on which such things are a venue.

Despite his anus receiving multiple pozzed loads in his lifetime, the problem with meritocracy is that it's entirely subjective. Could you imagine living in a leftist meritocracy where being a faggot or minority entitles you to better treatment?

undeserving of quads
we are all the same, it is only skin colour, 300 year ago we all had the same grandfather!!! there are no biological differences between people whatsoever and there is not one single shred of proof that says otherwise.
we're all from africa so we are all africans but africans are so much more beautiful mmm niggerdick is my favourite, I can't wait for all of the world to be enriched.
UGH UGHYEAH DDIVERSIFY ME YEAHBABY UGHUGH MAKE MY GENES EXTINCT UGH UGHYEAH
The diversity cult is the best thing I ever joined, diversity makes me sweat, they are so ethnic, I hate whites and I want Europe to be killed.
Right fellow Zig Forums user white man?

And as suspected you're a nigger. You can't even fucking define what you consider merit and yet you build your imaginary utopian dream on some abstraction and rhetorical bullshit. KYS

>>>/trannypol/
Just fuck off and take your aids with you. Wash your hair dye out, stop taking HRT and remove all your facial piercings before you kill yourself, so at the very least your family won't have to be embarrassed to look in the casket.

Too late. OP is definitely part of the 45%.

the 45% of niggers with aids?

No. Incorrect. You and the lefties have this in common. You rely on skin-colour first. While I view skin-colour about as important as the colour of your hair.

Well, that is the point of this exercise. Imaginary utopian abstraction… although I'm quite certain that we're slowly moving away from abstract and starting to form something concrete.

And I do recall replying to you and posting how I define merit.

Please kind contrarian, post your beliefs so that I can deem them all wrong.

Attached: 1512164967613.jpg (621x672, 50.42K)

The 45% of transfags that neck themselves. Good riddance.

just fuck off newfag cancer.
people used to say "lurk 2 years before posting", the reason being that there wouldn't be these fucking pathetic shitball waste of time cancerous threads with clueless fucking cunts like you posting your poisonous dogshit.
kill yourself you stinking niggerkike

I did read the Wiki article. Doesn't sound very remarkable… Mind sharing any relevant information about him?

anyone who believes race is only skin deep is a fucking moron stopped reading here

I can't tell the difference between niggers and trannies, because I'm not racist.
All I know is they both have aids.

Lurk 2 years faggot.

Attached: 599549027830100490490no.jpg (490x490, 43.61K)

National Socialism

It's just a mental exercise. That's what internet discussions are for, among other things.

I never said that I believe race is only skin deep. I said that as long as you can pull your weight, I don't care. There is a difference, boyo.

And I can't tell the difference because I don't live in a place where I would encounter such people.

fuck off politicanus

Sage this thread and stop replying. OP is not worth anyones time on /pol

Attached: 1559583368272.png (662x636, 320.14K)

it's a /trannypol/ aids-case, all they can do is copy-paste bits and pieces from authorised website sources, and stick them together with buzzwords.
they can't think or analyse, and rely entirely on rhetoric.
that is why they make threads like this cancer.

Lurk another 10 years, kid.

I wrote every line of my replies.
Kinldy point out where do you believe I have copy/pasted anything. After that be so helpful to point out any "buzzwords".

If you can't, do me a favor, go to another thread. I'm trying to have a debate here.

monarchy where the monarch rises to power and maintains his power through dharma and righteous might is the best system. anything less is shallow and for casuals who lack faith and don't have any balls.
what if we all just gathered around in a big circle before drowning ourselves in a bog?

Attached: guy with truck in tree.jpg (640x432 47.52 KB, 35.22K)

Give me your address and I'll have Soros send an assorted shipment of trannies, niggers and a shitload of howling muslim child rapists/murderers to ensure optimal enrichment.
Order now and we'll include a collection of 12 highly contagious diseases that had been previously extinct in your country.

Some faggot wrote this somewhere, posting it here.

The problem isn't any specific political system (e.g. Anarchy, Minarchy, Fascism, Monarchy, Communism), it's the way those who are delegated authority are selected.

I believe the answer is to align the polity recognizing that human nature is what it is (and changes very slowly, if at all), and that many will make decisions based on short time preference and unenlightened selfish self interest.

With regards to the current US system, repealing the 19th is a no-go, as is the 14th. White men clearly didn't care enough, or trust themselves enough, or (maybe) discovered enough of a moral conscious to keep the vote to themselves. Moreover, just because you're white and male doesn't mean you're not a mush-brained r-selected POS that isn't going to vote for psychopaths who will ruin your society.

However, since universal suffrage always leads to Communism or worse, how do we restrict it? The dork enlightenment would say eliminate it, but that's a no-go for practical and logical reasons. Practically, people won't accept it, and logically, there will always be a form of popular will being represented in the social order. IMO the question is how do you organize a polity so that only those that are most likely to improve and insure the future are making the decisions?

Since no political system that is even somewhat democratic can survive universal suffrage due to selfish incentives, suffrage needs to be restricted to private sector parents of living children that are net tax contributors.

That is the first principle, all other steps should be to insure that it is adhered to.

So, for example… No vote for:

Anyone who isn't the parent of a living child. You don't have a stake in the future. Sorry. Get married and have a fucking kid.

Anyone deriving income directly, or indirectly from taxes. You have conflicted interests in civil society vs. bureaucratism. Nobody should be trusted (or asked) to vote themselves out of or into a job. This includes e.g. politicians, civil servants, welfare recipients, employees of government-supported industry.

If a company is mixed-revenue (part private, part government contracts), use the private/public income ratio to determine whether a person gets more than 50% of their income from taxation. If yes, you get to vote. If no, you don't.

If any of the former reimburse government for the money they received, and produce a living child, they regain suffrage.

Those who don't fit into the above are the only demographic that can be argued to even begin to care about the future of their society.

People respond to incentives, and ours are FUBARed. We need to un-FUBAR them.

Immigrants and children of immigrants don't get to vote for at least 5 generations. All immigrants are on probation for at least 10 years. Commit a crime, become a burden, you go back, immediately.

Politicians and government employees DO NOT get to emigrate or hold dual citizenship, ever. No dual citizen politicians, or top 10 level of gov't agcy employees. No expatriation after service, for any reason. The point of all that is you don't get to fuck up the country and then flee.

Taxes need to be implemented along Georgism/Geolibertarian principles, e.g. land tax, high minimum threshold, clear title path to a natural living human… And NO OTHER TAXES except tariffs (perhaps not on commodities, but that's a geostrategic decision depending on circumstances).

Welfare is collected and distributed on a county level, maximum.

There are other rules yet to be thought of, but this is a work in progress. I'm sure other opinions will be offered, hopefully some will be useful.

Basically, any political system needs to be subversion-proofed. Not just from kikes either, but from any similar group (e.g. pajeets, organized crime, etc.). I suspect the ethnic makeup might be very interesting under such a system, my personal guess is it will be similar to Switzerland (shared political system with self-segregation), but who really knows.

Attached: PEPE - 4D.jpg (723x679, 180.1K)

Nah, feel free to keep them in your backyard. Your society gave birth to them, you keep them.

Go back to /trannypol/, post videos of yourself sucking dick, then slash your throat.

You are most unproductive in this discussion. But since you love talking about male homosexual practices, maybe you should simply come out of the closet, fap to some homosexual porn and chill.

There are plenty for the whole world.
As a blind, tranny, nigger, muslim, aids-filled, spastic in a wheelchair, faggot ebola-vector, I can tell you about all the benefits you will have from diversity.
1. your country will be more diverse
2. diversity is your strength
3. being diverse is more diverse
4. diverse
5. diversification and diversifying is diverse
6. diversificty.

1. Ban usury.
2. Ban dual citizens.

Sounds wonderful. I think I'll pass. You can keep those.

eat shit faggot
there is no discussion since the faggot sjw freak commie op already prevented any real discussion by making it take place in a fantasy non-existent dimension where niggers are supposedly 'people'.
chances are extremely high that you are either op on a sockpuppet, or one of his faggot friends.

< imagine political system
Stopped right there, not even worthy discussion. If you think the moral fabric of societies has nothing to do with genetic, you are an adept of environmentalism, which is what the jewish race preaches about all the time. You already failed.

Also this post, OFC there will be retards sperging out about your comment, because it makes sense. It is what (((they))) do in social sciences. Whenever race is mentioned, they try to take down like the neanderthals they are.

I hope OP dies.

Attached: merchant.jpg (641x360, 274.04K)

Great! I'll pencil you down for 8 million the first year, and a doubling amount ever 10 years while they breed like bacteria on dogshit and drag your country back to the stone age.
If you have any problems with the delivery, feel free to be arrested and have your life destroyed.

Why do you keep pushing this, when kikes have the same level of neanderthal dna as other arabs, as in barely above subsaharan africans which have 0%.
Have you ever bothered to look up the stats, or are you just a paid kike poster.

geneticliteracyproject.org/2018/10/09/crime-violence-and-dna-the-many-faces-of-maoa-the-so-called-warrior-gene/

I was born this way as long as i can think.