Not even Bernie Sanders got this much hatred by liberals and Democratic Party insiders in 2016, and he was close to getting the nomination.
Meanwhile Gabbard doesn't usually poll above 1% and so many Blue Checkmarks and "news" outlets yet she managed to elicit such a strong negative reaction towards her by so many liberals and centrists, even though she shares like 80% of her views with other Democrats. Is the 20% of her views unique to her campaign the cause of it?
Meant to write
Fuck phoneposting
What a slimey kike that Jacob wohl is. Would love to bash his skull in with a sledgehammer in minecraft
Well, it's obvious
she's not a zionist (or as much of one as (((they))) want)
Those pics are pretty damn funny though
M O M M Y ! ! !
Do you even have to ask? They are afraid of the overton window shifting towards anti-interventionism, the only thing preventing every Arab nation around Israel from invading them is the fact that we continuously topple their governments and fund terrorist groups in the region. A new Ottoman empire would give them the six million deaths they've been complaining about for so long.
She'll institute Dharmic governance and btfo Abrahamists once and for all
HARE KRISHNA HARE KRISHNA KRISHNA KRISHNA HARE HARE HARE RAMA HARE RAMA RAMA RAMA HARE HARE
...
Ma Gabbard will strike terror in the black hearts of jew vermin in the name of Kali maaaaaaa!
DINO
no video?
Internet Trolls Are Raving About Tulsi Gabbard’s Debate Performance—And They’re Calling Her “Mommy”
The Hawaii Democrat continues to draw support from elements of the alt-right.
> High-profile right-wing and alt-right internet trolls like (((Jack Posobiec))), fellow Pizzagater (((Mike Cernovich))), and Infowars‘ (((Paul Joseph Watson))) praised Gabbard on Twitter for her performance alongside nine other candidates on the Miami stage.
> Users on the notoriously racist and sexist message boards Zig Forums and 4chan, which both serve as internet hubs for far-right trolls, voiced their support for Gabbard on debate night. In Zig Forums’s overall discussion thread for the event, Gabbard was mentioned far more than any other candidate. Users on 4chan also made several discussion threads dedicated to Gabbard’s night at the debate, affectionately referring to her as “mommy.”
proof thay (((they))) are watching us
> Such support for Gabbard isn’t entirely surprising. Since January, when Gabbard announced her campaign, elements of conservative media and the far right have been receptive to the Hawaii politician and aspects of her record, especially in foreign policy, that don’t track neatly with (((normal progressive or Democratic policy positions))). Some internet right-wingers who also feel like their politics don’t match well with most candidates, even (((Republicans))), have felt a common cause.
> Trolls have been attracted by her isolationist views and her willingness to criticize Israel, a country they believe (((Trump and other politicians))) have been too cozy with, along with her accusation earlier this year that Democrats participated in “religious bigotry” during their questioning of a Trump judicial nominee.
Source: motherjones.com
Archive: archive.fo
Thread theme
>m.youtube.com
youtube.com/watch?v=SP9wms6oEMo
Kek
Thread theme
…Who?
Glow in the dark nigger
Surely a Council of Foreign Relations Hindu woman is going to be the avatar of Hitler that we've all been waiting for. Surely.
#wow #whoa
beat me to it
Maybe her being hindu means she would favor india.
I like the Dharma as much as the next guy, but the idea that she is anything other than some shiny meatbag whore who is being offered up by the kike media to fulfill whatever two-minutes-hate bullshit they're trying to sell is… questionable.
1. Hitler was OK with India because of his interest with the region, mysticism and to spite the Anglos
2. It's already been discussed that her being on the CFR is just them having an obligatory non-interventionalist. If she supported what the CFR stood for, she would be pro-war which she is not
This thread is brought to you by a Tulsi Gabbard campaign staffer.
Seems like the CFR would put her up as an option to divide india and china.
Probably is a shill, but millions of times better than neocon cuckchan faggots spamming "vote for ZOGnald to get libs mad!"
obligatory
non-interventionist
veteran
Hindu
CFR
woman
I stand corrected. Sign me the fuck up.
Get this halfchan twatterposting cancer off my board nobody gives a fuck about modern day politics you fucking mong.
Totally organic (((you)))
Look user, israel jews are calling her out that means she is anti jew!!!
Do a backflip on your way down nigger
Exactly. True members of the POL forum would support a white man like G-d Emperor Trump, over some Hindy woman who supports Animal Assad and Iran, the #1 sponsor of global terror.
Very organic. Much wow. That's like some jews are good because they are anti-israel. You can't even disprove that her policies are totally anti-whites.
Indianafag here. Tulsi has a fully White parent (Germanic) and a parent who is half Polynesian, half White American. (Germanic). She's not South Asian in origin at all. She's Germanic with some Samoan like ancestry in her.
Or maybe because if a "lib" is elected president they'll completely open the borders and do everything possible to completely flood the country with spics?
Because she can win the nomination.
We've had completely open borders since the 1980s
Because Israel everything has to do with Israel.
Is this whole "anti-Semiticism is run by Jews" some retarded PsyOp or something to get us to stop being anti-Israel because that's really pro-Israel? Because its not working
Trump might as well be open borders, he's done fucking ==nothing== to solve the immigration issue. During the two years his party had Congress, he was busy playing Jew-Ball (golf) and being a good sabbath goy instead of working to build his wall
If both options are the same on some issues, might as well vote for the one who isn't a Zionist goy
Shes more a republican than Trump
The most important issue right now is preserving the white race. Opposing zionism doesn't matter if the candidate is also pouring oil on the fire and encouraging beaners to move in and replace us. Trump's not going to be the next Hitler, but doing nothing is better than making things worse.
Accelerationism works, but just letting your opponents win is not accelerationism. It's just suicide. Force them to be more aggressive in their tactics, escalate the situation. Don't just open the floodgates and hope white people suddenly decide to spontaneously rise up.
I've been thinking this. Nice to see it voiced by someone else.
Liberals and democrats please visit >>>/fascist/
...
>Why are (((they))) so afraid of Gabbard???
If she wins the nomination I'm voting for her 100%. Already donated
Cause (((FUNDERS))) want War with Iran, and do not care which political party (((they))) will USE to make that happen.
Also, her entire persona is very honest, sensible, sane, and she cannot be co-opted by the DNC, as was evidenced when she quit her DNC post and endorsed sanders.
Because if jews lose DNC its all over. Trump isn't starting any news wars for Israel, getting another neocon after Trump is their only hope. But if anti-war populism prevails in DNC too then jews are truly cornered animals.
Perhaps it is. However, Trump has completely failed on that. He said so himself, he is OK with mass immigration as long as it is "legal" and he keeps increasing H1B visas
The best possible outcome is that Gabbard acts as the catalyst for the left wing. She openly criticizes Israel. If she gets the nomination, more leftists will follow suite. It would be a very basic introduction to the left about the Zionist problem.
All problems lead to Zion. Cut it out and so many other issues like mass immigration will be cut out. We can't expect to see all problems solved at once.
Gabbard is the catalyst that we need, not ZOGnald. All ZOGnald did was hand over the catalyst to the left wing.
OK yeah this is definitely a PsyOp
this
Gabbard is also open boards is she not? What difference will it make even if she wins the Presidency? She is not white. The entire system is anti-white and needs to be deconstructed or destroyed and rebuilt for whites only. There are no more political solutions
*open borders Kek.
I expect gibbard shills to be any better than trump shills. They're just the same.
Of course she is.
She's the liberal flip of Trump (yes: Trump is liberal)
But think of Gabbard with respect to her constituents. Then think of Primary/General Trump with respect to his constituents.
She is literally the democrats Trump.
Because she says mean things about Israel.
Responses are JIDF all the way though.
You make a good argument, user.
Muh streetshitting crossbreed isn't getting the correct attention.
Die for Israel, faggot
Too easy to spot the jew.
Oh look, another (((underdog candidate)))
When will you faggots finally learn, it's all a show. You'll keep getting "disappointed" one cycle after another, being distracted by political circus, while they are gradually advancing their agendas. Attacking Israel doesn't mean that someone is on our side, Israel is like that glowing bait that people are drawn to while the huge jaws of international Jewry slowly creep around them.
wew
Still better to support than the proisraelis. Whatever antiisraeli appearences they need to keep we need to enforce until they become reality.
During the campaign and even in his personal life (he married Yael Trump off to Jews), he has been Jew since before politics. You are either purposely ignorant or you might be the biggest retard in the world to feel disappointed with Trump bending over to Jews.
Meanwhile Gabbard is Hindu so she doesn't carry the "Christian Guilt" that makes her religiously obligated to ZOG. And she has repeatedly called out Israel in public and by supporting Assad.
So fuck off with this retarded nihilistic PsyOps. You can stay home and close your eyes and hope that ZOG disappears if you do that long enough. You do you, I'll at least Write-in the candidate that Jews, neocons and neolibs fear the most (with good reason)
Tulsi backwards is islut
I’m sure Hitler would have been super duper okay with Indians running Germany and imports ring millions of shitskins
Importing*
Lol, (((media outrage))) against certain candidates mean they are anti-jews, such clever user, maybe you should go back to cuckchan. Did you forget when tulsi was once anti-lgbt then caved in, becoming pro-lgbt and equality?
You're not different from trumpniggers
It's her opposition to these bullshit wars that frightens (((them))). Tucker had her on his show the other day solely for her strong opposition to perpetual war and the fact that shes a war veteran on top of that. Now that the Democrats are essentially just anti-Trump they can't afford any ideological debates about why they would support these wars when Obama was the candidate of peace in 2008.
You forget one thing, unlike Trump. Gabbard isn't a bigot.
...
OMG, it would be disappointing if Trump would not getting reelected because people care more about killing Jews than stopping mass migration.
What's even the problem with such a war? It wouldn't be an occupation, are you aware of that?
Israel is a red herring, without the international Jew controlling almost every country in the world they would be just another irrelevant sand-hole.
I tried to warn people about (((Trump))) since day one, even got banned by imkikey because of it, but they didn't listen. Now they are about to fall for a similar scheme.
Even if she is not kiked (very unlikely), I don't see a difference between being ruled by poos or Jews. No one who is not entirely pro-white, without strings attached, is a good choice.
She's not from India, she's a native Hawaiian.
mother jones went full stalinist after 2016. Sad!
...
Even if she's a shill having here bumped up is always a good thing
Remember that if it does end up being Tulsi v Trump then we'll be in a situation where both candidates will be forced by their campaigns to be anti interventionalist which means the moment they step out of line they can be destroyed
She has no chance, but she’s basically redpilling the Democrats just by being there. She’s a 70s-era anti war liberal who doesn’t want wars for Israel. Basically, she’s a Trump-era conservative. She’s also the only candidate who stands out policy-wise, which makes this fact even more glaring. And to top it off, she’s a “woman of color”, which makes it impossible for them to just laugh her off as a racist, sexist - which is basically their only argument anymore.
Really need to get a pro tulsi operation going.
Thing is perpetual war won't truly disappear, its execution will shift more towards digital. So I don't see her being truly non-interventionist if she got in, but rather proposing a way to reduce physical human involvement in warfare. Any candidate in general which present themselves as anti-interventionist, would still need to satisfy the military industrial complex in some way to stand a better chance.
That kind of put her in a better position than the rest, and it sets up a controversial populist candidate narrative (if they change their mind and think she might be useful for a different reason). She's got a small chance from that potential alone. All depends on behind the scene policy proposals she makes with certain groups.
Being against (((regime change))) is that much of a red flag for these losers.
Starting a war now would make that a major issue for the next election, and potentially get one of the few anti-war Democrats the nomination. Trump wouldn't have brought in Bolton if he had no intention of giving the jews another war.
In his interview with Tucker Carlson, he flat out said that by not attacking them yet he "built up a lot of capital", and that if something were to happen, presumably orchestrated by the jews, he's in a position to "do far worse" to Iran. That's the real 4D chess he's playing.
The biggest advantage is that she isn't a Christfag so she can't be guilted into serving (((The Chosen People)))
The same as Yang I think. Notice how the two least Zionist candidates are not Christian shabbat goys
Honest question to the schizophrenic glowposters here, would a second blunpf term be better than a tulsi term? Trump is hastening the complete collapse of America far faster than the stint of good governance campaign tulsi would probably exhibit.
People honestly supporting trump this election are going to be sorely disappointed the mood around here won’t be nearly as jovial as it was in 2016
Just the imminent threat of war is more than enough to achieve that effect.
The collapse of America would be caused by major redpills, not handing more pieces of the US to kikes
The Weimar Republic collapsed because of the Nazis, not because they elected a shabbos goy into office
Gabbard is going to end up redpilling a ton of leftists as she keeps criticizing Netanyahu and Israel. *Leftists* unironically have a better chance at getting redpilled than the Right
Because with ZOGnald, all you'll get is conservatives in a dick measuring contest to see whose the bigger goy
What am I reading?
You mean these? I find it funny that you faggots only talk about her stance on Israel and not others.
Wow (((you))) outed yourself
no one is saying she is not a loony left winger, but the pushback she is getting is remarkable
i was a member of the same cult Tulsi was a part of, ISKCON, for 10 years. Ask me anything
You don't think Trump hasn't done any of that, faggot?
80% of what you posted Trump supports in one way or the other - and thats him in his first term where he needs to worry about his base for election
A candidacy of Tulsi Gabbard has a number of detractors, no one denies this.
- She carries the dual susceptibility of being both female and a relatively young female (for political leadership) at that.
- She is 1/4 non-Aryan, though she has managed to integrate that aspect of herself pretty well. (Although, this seems to upset the larping Left more than the Right.)
- Religiously, she is a practicing Hindu, which is not as realistically-oriented a paradigm of thought as it could be.
- And she has already expressed left-wing leanings re: key issues facing Weimerica.
However, as a candidate, Tulsi Gabbard also has a some key assets.
- She has demonstrated the charisma of standing for what she believes in, which is a substantial characteristic in our age of spineless politicians.
- She can't be attacked for being a racist, nor a misogynist, nor really a bigot of any kind, which is one of the Jew's key tools of attack.
- As a Hindu, Tulsi Gabbard recognizes that the holy Swastika is an ancient symbol of life, still in use by numerous cultures, and not an expression of hatred towards Jews.
- Most importantly, she's genuinely anti-war, not just paying lip-service to the idea. Without upping the ante, the Jews won't get her into another war. The few anons who get on Zig Forums shilling for war are either insane, or paid, (or just as likely, both). All fun 'n games aside, not going to war is a major positive to the equation.
How well she would match up against President Trump, that I don't know. Personally, I think the likelihood of Trump's reelection is 99.995% But she would keep him honest, methinks. Esp. re: the not-going-to-war-for-Israel part. But first she has garner more support to put her in the game. The Jews REALLY hate her, which means that she's been identified as a threat to their schemes. The enemy has marked their own worst nemesis for us.
From an accelerationist perspective, Tulsi Gabbard has a lot of potential. She more of a centrist than a Left-leaning Democrat. This would drive the Left, which cannot slow down nor takes a step back, but must accelerate, this would drive the Left to ever greater political stunts. I think this would ultimately be redpilling for the Nation.
Rereading this, weighing the pros and cons, how do I feel about Tulsi Gabbard? She's pretty, she's charismatic, and she's conservative. Those are not nothing. She's staunchly not Jewish, and won't go to war for Israel. That's a big plus. And I think she's got a shot at disrupting some of the (((plans))) that the tools on the Left would drive us into. If we can get her into the running for the nomination as the Democratic candidate, despite the constant shilling and inner battles and cynics of Zig Forums, we've done something good.
Can all the Hope Faggots ITT just please remember that we live in a meatgrinder and the only reality is Total Fucking War, Forever? Thx.
She doesnt look polynesian to me.
I've been there, done that. You may live in a total war forever. I don't.
And besides, isn't it wonderful to watch MSNBC and CNN squirm in their seats as they try to explain how the most racist, exist place on the internet backs Tulsi?
It would be even more delicious to watch them have to back her on a day-to-day basis. It would turn their already lunatic minds inside out on live television.
REMINDER SHE IS ANTIGUN AND IS ACTUALLY PRO ISRAEL
The current kike propaganda tactic is to associate anti zionism with ocasiocortez and ilhanomar and in turn falsely associate it with obnoxious neo marxian faggotry in order to somehow deceive the rights more patriotic but deceived side of voter pools such as the trump crowd.
You faggots need to grow up and realize that trump alike all the presidential candidates are simply actors and obfuscators to the direction in which the true dominators lie, Judaic full spectrum dominance.
The goddamned jews have a totally different concept of power and their layers of global deception are highly abstract.
Remember at the core, all warfare is deception.
Fighting is lying.
Shes another false hope and controlled opposition just like trump, there to placate your silly goyim mind while the same agenda advances at the same rate as always just in different areas that they can now get in away with the current candidate.
Keep your minds safe from cointelpro, it is gonna be a racket in the next years to come.
Tulsi Gabbard isn't anti-gun. She has minimally taken the stance on gun restrictions that the Democrats would have of her.
And pro-Israel, you say?
That's why the Jews hate her with a passion, worse even than Donald Trump.
Nope, I'm not buying it.
KEK
YOU ARE A BLATANT LIAR OR A DECEIVED FOOL
this is from her website you fucking kike:
votetulsi.com
SHE ACTUALLY SUPPORTS H.R. 3999
Tulsi is a cosponsor of H.R.3999 (2017). This bill amends Title 18 of the United States Code to prohibit the manufacture, possession, or transfer of any part or combination of parts that is designed to increase the rate of fire of a semiautomatic rifle, but does not convert the semiautomatic rifle into a machine gun.
=WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU FAGGOTS??==
tulsicucks are just as pathetically delusional as trumpcucks
nothing will ever change by voting
be empowered with your own mind and hands
She's another DNC puppet of a different flavor asking people to send money to ActBlue, who gives a shit.
Jews aren't afraid of any brown people. They are the number one producer of brown people on the planet.