How high age of consent led to feminism, sexual revolution and mass immigration

Fuck you mods edition. This is legitimate discussion.

Absolutely ==everything== in feminism is connected to high age of consent. It is the only reason why feminists were able to succeed. Without it, feminism can't even exist.
1) As a feminist, you need to enable promiscuity and no fault divorce, i.e. get rid of monogamy.
Sexual liberation aka the sexual revolution could've never happened without raising the age of consent, because it would mean that minors would get literally bought by rich dudes, they would get fucked by all sorts of low lifes, some adults would pump'n'dump them, people would film them in porn, and society, the monogamous decent men and parents, would rebel against it immediately. This is why you need to raise AoC and say "as long as they are adult, they can do whatever they want with their bodies".
Now, age of consent DOES NOT prohibit close in age sex. That means girls get drunk fucked and pump'n'dumped by UNDERAGE Chads. Since underage betas can't compete with underage Chads in a school society that operates by jungle rules, 20% of underage guys fuck 80% of underage girls. This is perfectly legal, and you cant stop it, as you cant jail them for it. "As long as they are close in age, its alright, even with a bit of alcohol, they are young and are having fun".
This means that an average non-hideous girl loses her virginity at age 11-14 to some underage Chad and by the time she reaches the AoC of 16-18 - she is already a total whore. She, obviously, can't go back to being a pure virgin, so she continues being a whore. Hypergamy enabled.

If monogamy was still a thing and men were allowed to date younger girls, it would all go to shit. Adult betas wouldn't allow Chads to fuck u-age girls, so most girls would get married early with no chance to fuck around. Also, women wouldn't leave their husbands, because a decent older man can find himself a better younger girl, and an old whore that left her husband won't find shit. Women would still be clinging to their husbands like their life depends on it.

Attached: 1562130477421.png (1447x623, 92.94K)

2) As a feminist, you need to spread your ideology and enable feminist lifestyle.
This is where public education comes in place. Feminism happened right when public education got widespread. This is where you brainwash the girls (and boys) into believing your crap. And you need absolute authority over them, you need government support to spread your agenda (and the government will support you, as you now have the right to vote and hold political office).
It would all go to shit again and you wouldn't be able to brainwash anyone, if the girl got influenced by some higher patriarchal authority, i.e. an adult guy who's courting or already married to an adolescent girl. That girl will completely ignore all the feminist babbling in school, she might even publicly rebel against it, because her fiance/husband holds much higher authority in her eyes, she is in love with him after all. Men would just use their right to date and marry adolescent girls, and shape them in the patriarchal ideals, and men would ignore all women that choose the feminist path. Feminists would end up old and single or will have to settle for low quality males, and that would set an example for younger generations of girls, who would be eager to marry at a young age to get hold of high quality men and secure their future.

Note: the father is not an authority figure during adolescence, that stage of life is meant for you to defy and antagonize your parents, and its natural and socially beneficial, so yeah shut the fuck up boomer. A father is especially pathetic in the feminist society with high AoC, where he is with 99,99% certainty married to a whore who bosses him around and always threatens to divorce him (if they are not divorced already), so not only he doesn't have any patriarchal authority - he actually solidified the girls feminist views.

Attached: 1562130513341.webm (842x474, 2.99M)

3) Then you need to establish a social hierarchy that will provide you (feminists) with benefits.
School allows you to do just that. Because you banned adult men from dating adolescent girls, minors are left entirely to themselves. Adolescents compete for other adolescents. To you as a feminist this is beneficial because:
- it creates a social bubble, a society within society, minors have their own space that is entirely separated from all encounters with adults, apart from school and other government sanctioned projects
- as minors lose all direct influence that comes from adult men, they get influenced with everything else: public school (which is now controlled by the feminist government and promotes feminism so that girls would fuck around and study to pursue "important" career), family (which is now entirely matriarchal with a cuck husband and a bitchy emancipated whore of a mother), mass media/culture (which is under feminist control) and of course the other minors (who, being influenced from all the above sources, become degenerate as fuck and follow the feminist agenda).
This is a perfect opportunity to create a literal jungle society of apes, with a strong hierarchy based on brute force and social conformity.
As minors regulate their own society themselves and are forced to coexist in public school, adolescent boys start bullying and beating the shit out of each other for social weight and girls attention. This is where Chads appear, the 20% of men. Chad follows the social dogma, bullies anyone who deviate from it and fucks everything in the vicinity. The rest 80% of guys get shit on in school, have little to no social weight and little/no access to girls. These boys grow into adult virgins, turn into beta cuck orbiters, homos or trannies, and sublimate into hobbies and career.
This is where Chad/beta hierarchy appears.
And you already know how women benefit from it. Chad fucks, you provide, through taxes and directly.

Attached: 1562130529019.jpg (640x480 142.11 KB, 201.09K)

4) Now you need to globalize the world and spread feminism around it, and you also need to protect your country from local beta males who might, no, ABSOLUTELY WILL get angry, rebel and quit the workforce.
This is where mass immigration comes in handy.
As local beta males start checking out of the feminist society due to the fact that it provides them no benefits at all and simply parasites on their labour, as male to female suicide grows as high as 10 to 1 (in official statistics, which doesn't take into account all sorts of "accidents" at work, unsafe driving, drug abuse, crime, etc, and males make about 99% of all that), with prisons getting filled by all sorts of men who rebel against the government or simply go ape shit due to the fact that the government doesnt give a crap about males - WOMEN NEED MORE MEN. They need to replace you, you fucking anime wanking NEET. So they import foreigners, en masse.
Hordes of foreigners come to your country to take your jobs, take your women, join your army and police you. 3rd world shitskins are glad they can swap their shithole for a prosperous country full of money (compared to what they are paid back home) and promiscuous beautiful women that are hungry for something exotic (or can be raped if they are not).
These men get paid a crappy wage (which is still a lot by shitskin standards, but crap by your standards). Taxes get raised to shits, which consolidates money in the hands of the government, which gives it to women and their children (and elderly).
So, if local men reject the rules of the feminist society, they are left with no job (and it doesnt really matter that the shitskin does the job poorly, just import more shitskins) and have to deal with an army and police of foreign men that hold authority over locals.
When the country runs out of white cucks willing to fight and work for women, it will be replaced by foreign men.

Get fucked pedo.

Kill yourself pedo.

5) This is where things might get "interesting", as when foreign men become the majority in the military they might just take control of the feminist government by force. Women will be trying to weed out and replace any men that are anti-feminist, the same way they replaced all the local men, but the shitskins might figure it out and simply stand together against some unit getting disbanded by the feminist government. This will trigger the confrontation, either a civil war, or shitskin men just straightforwardly taking over the government. This in turn can start a global war, with buttons being pushed by little fingers with polished and pink colored nails, and the world will be no more.
I think this is how it ends with feminism and high age of consent. That, or women will be able to slowly convert muslims and niggers into feminist cucks.

Anyway, eventually, with high age of consent European men will be replaced, and thus European people will die out.

Attached: 1562130634453.png (500x652, 127.82K)

>>>/reddit/

You already posted this fucko. Get lost.

Oh really?!
Well lets just fuck kids then why not!

Attached: idontgive.png (853x682, 210.85K)

kike mods 404'd it

wew

What is this numbered list bullshit? Are you quoting from somewhere?

Thanks moderators! Great thread!

Attached: Italian4.jpg (1937x496 48.09 KB, 378.76K)

Got any stats to back that up? I've heard that it's 17 for women.
I've also heard that attractive women are LESS likely to be whores because they can afford to be selective while unattractive women take whatever chances for sex they can get.

Another thing that kind of flies in the face of this is that, at least so far as I have seen in ancient marriage records, girls generally didn't get married until around 20 or so. But I'm completely open to changing my mind if someone can present actual evidence ACTUAL evidence that the average age of marriage in say 17th century Europe was 11-14, as you say.

Nigger, femikikes are the ones that pushed for the high AOC. Get it right.

I disagree with some of what OP says here but to delete this quality thread while leaving up two-sentence threads is not doing your job as a mod. Stop deleting effort-posts.

who advocated for the rights of children?
who helped fund feminism?
who wants to inject a high amount of shitskins into white areas?
(((You guessed it)))

Attached: ..png (195x193, 91.72K)

That second picture holy shit. That can’t be real, surely no one would pay that. Please tell me it’s fake

my great great grandparents got married when they were 13

my great grandparents were married when she was 16 and he was 19(then went to ww2 to fight for zog)

but those are just my two more immidate grandparents I can think of. A lot of my family were grape pruners and farmers, and married really young.

There's also a greentext about a girl who was 9 and married to someone who was 22.

The only recorded point in history when women started to marry at older age was under late feudalism in England and parts of Western Europe. Feudalism became so oppressive to the peasants that women basically became property of the land lord and weren't allowed to marry unless the land lord allowed it. Land lord, obviosly, did not allow shit, unless he already had his fun with his young peasant girls. Only then he allowed his cuckold peasants to marry the used-up roasted peasant women. That resulted in a lot of spinsters and women using post-birth abortion, with children being thrown into river like kittens. England and some parts of Western Europe sure were fucking degenerate at that point in history, but it only lasted about a century, until this degenerate system collapsed. Late medieval period was absolutely abhorent and full of misery, vile degenerate lords, with peasants being abused from all sides and wars being waged constantly, and with plagues everywhere. People tried not to breed and women didnt have much chances at marrying.

As for the rest of Europe and for all Europe in every other period, average age of marriage has always been around 11-15. Girls of older age were considered undesirable and ageing.


kikes literally raised it but ok

Attached: 1562139075115.png (1346x493, 108.43K)

no, as long as a girl has tits she'll sell herself off to the highest bidder. I wouldn't pay for that, she's a butter face and with that corset off I bet she's out of shape and has a fridge body.

OP, wen i find u, ill torture u, prolly to deth.

If you are not naming the jew, your message just ain't true.

Those are anecdotes.
While useful for historians, they could very well be outliers.
My own great grandparents were married at 19 (woman) and probably 21 or 22 (man)


First of all,
You can't trust wikipedia. Especially a wikipedia article that isn't even about marriage but about feudalism. That's not data.
Second of all, Prima Noctum is (mostly) a modern myth. I challenge you to find one actual example of Prima Noctum being practised outside of rumors in Scotland (that are mostly used to insult the King of England)
Even your source Wikipedia says it's fake.
I mean, just think about it; Do you really think that medieval peasants would just put up with a bunch of rapist lords? They were armed and revolted frequently when they felt unfairly taxed.

Your ancestors were late, but still early compared to how things have been (((made to be))) now.