What can we learn from the Gilets Jaune?

That's an entirely disingenuous commentary and you know it as well as I do.

Lone-wolf "terrorism" is not going to create a "political revolution", but it MOST CERTAINLY – and any attempt to deny this is demonstrable of the UTMOST in absent intellectual integrity – contributes to the polarization and ramping-up of political hostilities.
There is no denial of this.

Brenton Tarrant, just as an example, has done to move the game forward – in our favor, if we have the will and wit to capitalize on it – than any amount of optics-cuck street protests, rhetorical flourishes or grass-roots campaigns.

The intent is to start a fire (a political revolution). This requires both a spark and fuel.
The optics-cuck street protests, rhetorical flourishes or grass-roots campaigns – these are effectively gathering fuel.
The events like Tarrant, what you call "lone-wolf terrorism" – adopting the rhetoric of the enemy even as you claim to be a friendly strategist – are sparks.
As the need for this fire is not likely to dissipate anytime soon, and as your attempts to gather fuel have proven comparably meager, probability suggests it will happen again. Sparks will continue to be made until such time as enough fuel has been gathered such that such a spark ignites that fuel.

And when it does, the fire shall rise.

I feel you, bro. I too get frustrated with the abysmal IQ level nowadays.
You're also correct. Destroying property of the jews is a good thing regardless of whether it's insured or not because if a bunch of jewish property goes up in flames, insurance rates will rise. In addition, insurance companies are (usually) run by jews anyway so you're ultimately hurting the jews all the same. Finally, if the infrastructure of control is disrupted (via vandalism) it disrupts the jews plan. Thus, even if they were insured and recuperated all their losses, it STILL hinders jewish interests.
That said, I disagree in part with your…er… what you implied earlier about their children.
Without saying anything too specific, it would be somewhat less than ideal to be seen doing what you may or may not be implying. It's far more productive to go after jewish leaders than… er… some other things.

Attached: 86e78a6a4560e93bdac78cf7de5866a3c69fb33dde0d4e5e00a8f9b80473f663.png (600x651, 691.72K)

It's cute you say they had limited coverage when they were on mainstream news around the world at their peak

That most important thing that you had to say in that post, was the word 'disruption'.
The future of politics is not something as simplistic as 'terrorism', as I've seen some claim.

The future of politics is disruption.

The rest, all this
sort of shit… Is meaningless.
But I will be very blunt in saying I don't believe you are prepared to do anything more than the anons you decry.

You are too comfortable. But that is going to be disrupted. Such is inevitable now.
Food for thought.

Attached: you got change for a .38.JPG (1159x749, 125.42K)

They haven't learned the lesson we learned yet. Your are not free, but a slave, and once you realize that then the your actions become much clearer.

The French are not at that point yet.

>muh (((cartoons))) with (((John Benjamin)))
You're a jew, and you've become too comfortable.

Attached: 1559441936176.png (383x386, 255K)

Attached: big pants.JPG (1062x703, 66.13K)

I get what you're saying. And I support Tarrant because I always support our men of action.
However, Tarrant blew away 51 muslim scum and that's great. Yet things have not accelerated in any conceivable way. In theory, such an attack should have led to tit-for-tat racial/religious violence. This leads to destabilizing of society and revolution.
But that isn't happening.
Maybe we need more lone wolves. But that's simply not going to happen because most people aren't willing to throw away their lives for one or two actions against the enemy.

The only way lone-wolf terrorism would work is if they went after actually important people. But apparently that's asking for the moon.


Maybe not. Neither are you.

Tarrant spent years of his life in Israel. You're probably too stupid to understand the implications of this, so you can keep on defending him.