FUTURISTS

"And as the wind blew it carried the curved smoke from the vibrant factories, to the shining, screaming battleships, sailing across the bay. witnessing the loud cars driving across the bridges. The vibrancy creates a sensation on the eyes and skins of workers and artists, feeling a new revolution every day…"

Alright, I decided to create a Futurist thread since I don't see any here, most people are instead taking the eco gangs side. Most of this thread will just be copies from essays other places, enjoy.

MANIFESTO OF FUTURISM
1. We want to sing the love of danger, the habit of energy and rashness.
2. The essential elements of our poetry will be courage, audacity and revolt.
3. Literature has up to now magnified pensive immobility, ecstasy and slumber. We want to exalt movements of aggression, feverish
sleeplessness, the double march, the perilous leap, the slap and the blow with the fist.
4. We declare that the splendor of the world has been enriched by a new beauty: the beauty of speed. A racing automobile with its bonnet adorned with great tubes like serpents with explosive breath … a roaring motor car which seems to run on machine-gun fire, is more beautiful than the Victory of Samothrace.
5. We want to sing the man at the wheel, the ideal axis of which crosses the earth, itself hurled along its orbit.
6. The poet must spend himself with warmth, glamour and prodigality to increase the enthusiastic fervor of the primordial elements.
7. Beauty exists only in struggle. There is no masterpiece that has not an aggressive character. Poetry must be a violent assault on the forces of the unknown, to force them to bow before man.
8. We are on the extreme promontory of the centuries! What is the use of looking behind at the moment when we must open the mysterious shutters of the impossible? Time and Space died yesterday. We are already living in the absolute, since we have already created eternal, omnipresent speed.
9. We want to glorify war - the only cure for the world - militarism, patriotism, the destructive gesture of the anarchists, the beautiful ideas which kill, and contempt for woman.
10. We want to demolish museums and libraries, fight morality, feminism and all opportunist and utilitarian cowardice.
11. We will sing of the great crowds agitated by work, pleasure and revolt; the multi-colored and polyphonic surf of revolutions in modern capitals: the nocturnal vibration of the arsenals and the workshops beneath their violent electric moons: the gluttonous railway stations devouring smoking serpents; factories suspended from the clouds by the thread of their smoke; bridges with the leap of gymnasts flung across the diabolic cutlery of sunny rivers: adventurous steamers sniffing the horizon; great-breasted locomotives, puffing on the rails like enormous steel horses with long tubes for bridle, and the gliding flight of aeroplanes whose propeller sounds like the flapping of a flag and the applause of enthusiastic crowds.

Attached: SPEED.jpg (600x373 66.42 KB, 35.13K)

Most of the alt-righters that I have witnessed talk with little to no arguments, and almost no philosophical sense. The subject is violence. Their opinion is very primitive; "oh it's ok if we damage them, but its not ok when they damage us". That is something you would hear an African tribesman say.

But back to the original subject.

Violence in its beauty achieves a plethora. The most efficient direct actions are achieved, most effectively, trough violence. Cemented rule is gained trough a violent, vibrant and loud revolution. Violence manifests itself in the beauty of action and direct rule. It destroys, it creates, it influences. Violence is beautiful.

Attached: dvx.jpg (472x332, 32.88K)

A common sight i see is people reffering to themselves as both 'fascist' and 'right-wing'. This does not work. I will explain why the right-wing is NOT part of us. The right winger would praise pre-revolutionary Iran because he saw a few pics of girls in mini-skirts, but he is oblivious to everything else broken, that the revolution fixed. He praises everything in accordance to him, and all of them proudly describe themselves as "patriotic", "conservative", "christian", "reactionary", "monarchist", "capitalist" and more. Their hipocricies never end, most of them call themselves "fascist" and also "reactionary", and the rest don't know what "reactionary" means. Some of them are consciouss on the ((()))ish question, however most of them support Israel because they are "our greatest ally" and "le epic kebab removers xD". They indulge in discussing today's geopolitics, while lacking in knowledge on both the world today, and politics. You can see them praising capitalism and monarchy while still claiming that they are fascist because they heard this guy Pinochet was capitalist and he also threw commies from helicopter which is le epic. They call themselves proud ethnonationalists and christian, while drowning themselves in Richard Spencer's ideas, Ben Shapiro rekt dumb feminist video #3628 and PragerU on why it's so sad when people die, except if tuey are not Israeli. They claim monarchies work because "tradition is important now leave me alone as I fantasize over animated Japanese girls", while still mourning the deaths of French royalty during the revolution or the incapable idiot called Nicholas II.

Now some of you may be thinking, oh, we all used to think like that, and we did! Most of us did! But that, the praising of the right wing, is just a part of the path. Most of us were like that but we did not stop there, whilst they think that is their end. To them it is, but to us is not. That is why people who refer to themselves as "capitalist", "monarchist", "conservative", "christian" or anything along those lines IS NOT PART OF US.

Attached: 105snslgh381000b999.jpg (830x550, 99.37K)

I am visiting Nietzsche's philosophical thought of the "Master" and the "Slave morality", as it plays a massive, maybe even pivotal role in my ideology, and all of those simmilar to mine (different types of fascism). As the main theme in his book "The Genealogy of Morality", it inspired me to dedicate my time thinking and writing about it, this is my result.

For the sake of easier explanation, I will begin with the "Slave morality". The "Slave morality" stems from weak human instinct, as it secures their survival under the Master. It lives in the present, and it serves the present, with motives and morals from the past. It is the basic, Biblical idea of utilitarianism. It doesn't aim to transcend, or to achieve, just to cement it's own instinctive status quo. It's main motives don't even stem from their own idea, it stems from something external (the Bible for example), and the "Slave" is expected to follow it, just like a robot. To the "Slave" is described what is "good" and what is "bad", and without thinking subjectively and independently, it follows the moral idea that is served to it on a plate. Instead of creating it worships and follows the already created. Slow, evolutionary action replaces the beauty of direct action and pity replaces violence. It condems and insults every forward-driving force. Comparable to the abrahamic, democratic, monarchist and female systems of thought.

On the other side, the "Master morality" shines. The will of the strong and their action and driving force characterises it. It is the polar opposite of Kant's theories, aswell, it doesn't weigh actions and influence on "good" or "evil" described by instinct, rather it weighs them depending on it's consequences and influence on the future of the individual, the master individual. It's essence is nobility. What is bad for him is just simply bad, bad in itself. It's own independent thought creates his own values and moral system, a system that will quench his "Will to power", but that is a story for another time.

Attached: wanderer.jpg (750x960, 109.29K)

Why does power and control feel so good?

Time for another Nietzsche essay (don't worry this is the last one). Power desires violence and violence desires power. Violence is used to cement and entrench power. But back to Nietzsche. Will to power, or Machtgelüst, is best described in his book, "The Gay Science". The first level of the macro-desire, or the general desire of a populace is will to live. It is not weak, it is natural, that is why we need more, we always do. Will to power is the driving force in humanity, what propelled us as a species, and what differentiates us from animals (though some animals we percieve as "noble" show elements of the will to power).

The strong will risk their lives for power, because will to power is stronger than the will to live or survive. Schopenhauer was right about will to live, however he wasn't complete. Will to power is stronger, while will to life is instinctive and utilitarian. Instead of keeping its status quo, it is dynamic and circular, better reffered to as "eternal reccurence of the same".

Nietzsche

Attached: 33152683_464232310677585_2768832181550710784_n.jpg (600x767, 73.2K)

what the fuck else do you expect. its not ok if we damage them but ok if they damage us? or its not ok for either to damage.

Why are those who firstly insult your ideology more worthy of it than those who blindly accept it? I'm talking about the line between stubborn and naive. The line is finely drawn and few see it. Those who do retain their own personal originality. They are not your slaves, and they don't want to be.

I will always shrug off those who don't criticise and insult my ideas and just start blindly following it. They are naive and not worthy of it. I'm not looking for slaves and blind followers, I cherrypick on purpose.

Same counts for those stubborn, not willing to even see it. They don't want their broken, molten ideas to be shown to them, they follow it with no basis. They are people who can not accept that they are wrong.

Trust me, be wary of those that blindly follow your ideas, as they can be equally ignorant as those who don't even consider it.

What do I want from newbies following me? DON'T FOLLOW ME! Or atleast, don't follow me yet. I want you to dismantle and attempt to destroy my ideas and systems. Digest them as strong as you can. If you manage to destroy them, I'm sorry, but I failed you, yet i owe you nothing.

What do i want from educated individuals? Be cautious about educating those around you, for some aren't worth it, and others are a lost cause.

Violence is beauty

Attached: Patriotic Storm.jpg (500x778, 65.89K)

Sage

Attached: 64597105_1043816372482757_1267177427205881856_o.jpg (1440x1796, 130.25K)

A prevalent topic is the one of "tradition".

Tradition is both a blessing and a curse. A blessing we must take, and a curse that will doom us. As fast as modernity and degeneracy is, limits are to be had, those limits are tradition.

Tradition is needed because it is a pillar to the nation. Something that makes it special and different. Besides that, it is a joint worldview of a people, that keeps them on track. But if they stick to strongly to it, it will stagnate them. Tradition is like a shield with thorns on it, it will hurt, but you have to hold on.

However don't let it mold your future, just let it keep you on track. The future is more important. The utilitarian nature of conservatives makes me just look at tradition as worthless but it has it's worth.

So don't stay in the ambis. Make a choice. Don't have one? Create it. When society collapses lead the cultural and traditional revolution. Plant the seeds on which later generations will learn from. A new tradition is needed, one that glorifies the future, the youth, the destruction and creation, not worshipping foreign gods, not opportunism and utilitarianism.

To conclude, tradition is important, but a new one is needed. And a new one can only be a achieved trough an avant-garde and violent revolution.

Attached: La Rivolta.jpg (1440x923, 205.6K)

Clear your mind, just for a split second, now borrow it to me. What comes to your mind when I say the term "war"?

Large, vibrant battlefields of men eager to fight with bayonets, guns, artillery, ships, armored vehicles, planes? The spirits of soldiers in muddy trenches and snowy mountains? The colors and noises of a rifle, and the power it wields?

You are not wrong, but yet, you are not correct. As there is more to war than just a soldier's fight. Because war is not just a soldier's fight, it is a worker's fight, an artist's fight and a mother's fight. For the soldier is just one piston in the factory of eternal war and revolution.

Oh, children of the future and of revolution, rise from your eternal coffins and create. Create art, noise, smoke and make those fields and factories vibrant again. For you are the one in whom the beauty of direct action manifests. What stands before you?

Insulting and weak ideas of reactionarism, equality and perpetual peace. The bourgeois, lazy and stationary ideas of liberalism and reactionarism. Ideas of the "last man". Ideas that wield nothing but "morals" and "utilitarianism".

However the united front of workers, soldiers and artists is manifested in the beauty of anarchy, action and destruction, for destruction is what creates.

In a society that I wish, war and peace are one, the worker and the soldier are one, the tractor and the tank are one. A world in which man is united in combat against a common threat. THE CULT AND SOCIETY OF TOTAL MOBILIZATION!

The worker is not just the anvil, for he is the hammer to his anvil. And that hammer will crush the feathery class differences, for even in rest, the worker still is laying in the caring arms of productivity and technology.

The dusty hands of the worker, the beating chest of the soldier and the free head of the artist is what not only destroys time and space, it creates it anew.

Attached: War.jpg (668x850, 114.93K)