Daily reminder you cant beat the inventors of Christianity.
You got raped at some point.
This is not a question for Zig Forums You will be bette asking on >>>/b2/
kill yourself kike
Kikes already have your DNA you retard. They can obtain it anywhere. Been to the doctor lately? That's DNA for the Jew. Had a blood test? DNA
Cause gedmatch is not very good. It's calculators are outdated bullshit nowdays mostly You also don't seem to understand how similar are Ashkenazi jews to Italians. Most Ashkenazi jews are more close to Italians than to any middle eastern population. I think it is possible that South Italians themselves are partly jewish, or they are similar for other causes. Generally speaking there exists a cline Levant_Bronze_Age -> Samaritan (jews from middle east) -> Cypriots -> Sephardi jews -> Ashkenazi jews -> South Italians -> Spanish -> Basques -> Iberia_IA. Now, we know that ancient Myceanians had probably less Levant_Bronze_Age ancestry than modern Greeks/South Italians, which could mean that as Levantine ancestry is mostly North African + Mediterranean, then it could be that Greeks/Spanish and South Italians got North African ancestry instead of levantine ancestry. However oracle just tries to fit your ADMIXTURE ancestry percentages (if I am correct then Gedmatch calculators are based on ADMIXTURE) to modern populations and is therefore less accurate.
Literally DNA disproves it. Go away christcuck larper biblical jews are even more semitic than the current ones, they are similar to modern Palestinians Khazars were Turkic people and Turkic people are mostly east asians, genetically. digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol_preprints/41/
the cline is indeed visible but much of it is quite complex, especially when you include Iberians, as part of this cline is also deeply related to the amount of WHG ancestry neolithic farmers absorbed all the way into the stone age, from 0-5% in Greece up to ~25% in Iberia, so the type of folk that were in these areas back in the stone age matters the only ones with important detectable north African ancestry in any case seem to be non Basque Iberians, only west Sicily has a little bit too
If I am correct, are you the one who made hirisplex script in the Yamnaya thread? Now this will be a bit off-topic question. I've been using Hirisplex script while I changed two aspects I've got results for most ancient populations, while I also used it for some modern populations for testing Now the question is that could pigmentation snps (especially skin pigmentation genes) be too related to modern European DNA and less related to ancient European DNA. Modern Europeans are basically the only population with light skin and I doubt that this skin pigmentation will differ so much inside modern Northern European populations or in Southern European populations and could just correlate with Northern European ancestry. One method what I have noticed they have used for detecting SNPs and associating them with phenotype from studies is putting a lot of samples together and seeing what SNPs these individuals with these certain traits share, therefore SNPs for eye color and hair color could be more accurate though while I think as modern Europeans have most of their WHG ancestry through Steppe or European Neolithic farmers then we can't know for sure if WHGs had some of their own SNPs associated with light hair color (like Neanderthals had from what I have read). Now, I will have to admit that I am still amateur in genetics field so I am not sure how exactly do they confirm these predictions.
Also I am going to sleep, so I doubt that I could reply
yeah it's me I mean yes, that's the trouble, all of these association studies by their own nature link phenotype to genotype by looking at phenotype in moderns alone and then finding which genotype seems to have the highest correlation with the observed phenotype differences but since you can only observe phenotype in moderns, and at best the only phenotype you can observe in ancients is their bones and skull shape if you are lucky, there isn't much more that can be done really, especially since many traits like height or hair color are heavily polygenic and their expression is complicated so yeah, WHGs may have indeed possessed their own unknown light skin mutations or others, and we only got a fraction of them from some of them, which thanks to the boom they had after the neolithic revolution are now recognizeable
Looks like your father isn't actually your father
Do you feel the urge to call non-jews cattle or goyim? Do you feel the desire to chew on and consume foreskins? Do your eyes spontaneously turn red and do you then say: "ENSLAVE AND KILL ALL THE GOYIM!" followed by satanic gutteral sounds or laughing followed by sprouting demon wings to fly away to kidnap children for evil purposes? If no to the above, you're probably not jewish.
I mean I guess the more recent and within modern variation the populations are, the more accurate these predictions are going to be, though again they should be taken with a grain of salt and only as indicative doesn't help either that much of the sequencing done for ancients is diploid since it's targeted for pop genetics
HOLY SHIT GUY LOOK AT THE SCIENCE YOU'RE A FUCKING HEEB
Don't be a pedo you faggots.
you don't understand how GEDmatch works, that doesn't mean that you have that ancestry
you'd be better off posting this on The Apricity or Forum Biodiversity or something
There are copies of Torah hundreds of years older than when he existed. Your theory is idiodic
If you were actually jewish you would get a letter from israel with a free paid visit to your (homeland) and israeli citizenship. Retarded schizo thought he was jewish because hes an ugly mutt. pathetic.
Well, I'm reassured, I did my investigation on these sites long into the day and I'm not Jewish.
I already knew finally that I am not Jewish, - since iGENEA, which specializes in the detection of Jewish origin, revealed that I was 99% European and had no Jewish origin.