Hypothetically...

Wealth Inequality isn’t a problem, only idiots and losers think it is. The real problem is the bottom. The mass of useless people who don’t produce any value, and consume more many multiples more than they produce, and STILL complain it’s unfair even though they are basically subsidised to live way outside their means by the productive. Unless they learn to produce a consumer surplus those people will always be poor, they will always be a burden on the productive, and no degree of ‘redistribution’ will ever solve that. If we had a real country those people would have starved to death thanks to natural selection, and we wouldn’t have to undermine our civilisation by facilitating their parasitic bullshit or give them a single fucking cent. Such people are no better than the Jews, they’re both parasites that contribute nothing of value to society.

It's better than what exists, but suboptimal. Check Georgisim or geolibertariansism for hints on a better way to solve for preventing concentration of wealth.

You'll need to solve for concentration of state wealth too though, otherwise kikes will just take over the gov't and try and "own" it all that way.

Thanks for the new reading, I'll give those a look.

>Give the wealth to the dumbest people so they "control" the country instead.
Terrible idea.

fuckin commies

That's downright dysgnics, nigger.

Fuck off the just argued for ultra money jewness, royalty/Monopoly of and by the rich
The poor often work very hard, producing vital resources certainly more so then Paris Hilton ya fuck

This. Fuck off OP with your shitty genes.

All that would do would be to make you split up your assets before you die

this already exists. often called "the death tax" and was severely reduced by asshole Bush. And, middle-class ppl freaked out and abolished it even though most of them wouldn't even be hit by it. welcome to america