At what point can lethal violence against certain groups be qualified as moral?
What is the exact moment where physical resistance can be considered as responsible behaviour?
When can terrorism against groups promoting the spread of moral chaos be classified as sound judgement?
Other urls found in this thread:
8ch.net
twitter.com
If it benefits an ethnostate
OP is either FBI or FBI will be in soon. Zig Forums is a board of peace.
But if you really want the answer, might is right. Violence is justified when you win and set the standard for what's right. That's the real natural law.
yes i'm quoting myself
8ch.net
I dunno, OP. Ask the FBI.
Better yet ask the ATF. They have experience from Waco.
stop mystifying this meme, you jude scum
Imagine being accepted into the FBI, you pass all the tests… get yourself in shape… ready to defeat some seriously bad people. But you end up in some musky office in D.C. baiting neets to say something incriminating on an Indonesian basket-weaving bulletin board.
How do I know English isn't your first language? And this is a board of peace. Everything here is a parody and it would be silly to think anything should be taken seriously or presented in a courtroom as real evidence. For sure.
5513 suicide youtube stream in 20 minutes gg/Xq2uYaa
me not being a native english speaker does not change the fact that "be a X of peace" used in his literal meaning is a clear subversion of the use Zig Forums has always done of this expression.
fuck off.