On gender and communism

I'm banned from leftypol, so here goes.

According to the History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps episodes on Islam and Gender, in Islam, traditionally if the man does not sexually satisfy his wife, she can sue. A muslim man may have many wives, and he has them virtually as slaves.

I do not justify the system but there is something to be learned here. After all, a feminist woman can be made traditional if she is just fucked right. It is on men to be men enough to do so.

Women need an anchor, this will either be a man or a large group of friends, they will either be women or gay men. But a woman cannot reproduce with women or gay men. So when men are not strong and stable they fail society in a way that's not true for women.

Attached: 1630 Reza Abbasi - Two Lovers.jpg (971x1500, 472.45K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/falpX1HYLSo
psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2005-11115-001.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Males are naturally polygynous by nature, while the woman’s reproductive needs are satisfied by a single man. This is why polygyny of the most fit elements of society is the way forward in the future. With sterilized unfit elements there will be a surplus of women, all of whom will be impregnated by the polygynous chads

Gender is reactionary.

Go take your estrogen, piggy

What does this have to do with communism?

This is mega cringe. Why don't you try Zig Forums instead?

t. Mom

Oh, I'm sorry. I forgot to clarify. There was post on leftypol about women and communism and I figured this was relevant.

You Zig Forumsyps never cease to amuse me

lmao do you actually believe this?