Archaeologists have discovered a sprawling, possibly 3,000-year-old house that suggests a biblical kingdom called the United Monarchy, ruled by King David and later Solomon according to the Hebrew Bible, actually existed.
The archaeologists who excavated the house, at a site now called Tel Eton, in Israel, said in an article published online March 13 in the journal Radiocarbon that the date, design and size of the house indicates that a strong organized government existed at Tel Eton around 3,000 years ago. They added that this government may be the United Monarchy. The site is located in the central part of Israel in a region called the Shephalah.
Something that has trails all over the place since always "gets discovered"
Jewish tricks and schemes …
(you) also, filtered :^)
Daily reminder johnny neptune is actually a jew
yay! religious propoganda! where do I sign up for my religious pilgrimage to the United Monarchy? What a hip name! The ancients really knew how to rule in style, eh? Come! Come! Sign up for the tour! yay! Free money for Israel!
United Monarchy. It just drips of spin.
That's the true Temple of David. Once it's reconstruction is complete it will fulfill the first requirement of the prophecy. IMO this is a huge indicator of the Second Coming. Better start repenting Jim. All dogs don't go to heaven.
actually Jesus did exist because they have Roman state records of the first time he was brought to trial on charges of heresy or some such other before the Tetrarch of Galilee, case dismissed by the tetrarch because tetrarch thought he was a harmless deluded sage all the OT is bollocks tho
jesus may have existed
that doesn't mean he walked on water made bread multiply or floated up to heaven after being dead
What prophecy? Wasn't Jesus' body a temple in john 2:19? Wouldn't Him being raised from the dead have counted as the third temple after herods? Why do we need three temples destroyed for this so called 'prophecy' that I don't even know where I can read about it?
The Original Culture is Sumerian, This is the place where the First Man was born.
Fossils from the remains of a kill seem to suggest that early hominids were sailing from island to island in SE Asia over 500,000 years ago. Glacial melt in northern Europe has revealed 7000 year old skis. Your argument is invalid. There was no first man. Different races of humans evolved independently much much further back than current culture and science is willing to admit.
The idea a God created the universe and the Big Bang Theory aren't mutually exclusive though. The scientific community initially hated Stephen Hawking for the Big Bang Theory because they thought because he was implying a God because the idea of the Big Bang theory is the entire universe being created in a single event.
maybe possible with a god but not possible with the God of the Bible though
In what way?
How many jews could a /jews plus/ jew if a /jews plus/ could jew jews?
It's weird you and others have to attack the divinity/existence of Jesus in an story about archaeology. Almost like your following a ((script)) just saying