U.S. President Donald Trump sparked anger in France and Britain by suggesting looser gun laws could have helped prevent deadly attacks in Paris in 2015, and linking a wave of knife crime in London to a handgun ban.
In a speech to the National Rifle Association (NRA) on Friday, Trump mimicked the shooting of victims in the Paris rampage, and said if civilians had been armed “it would have been a whole different story.”
The French government issued its strongest criticism of Trump since he took office, at a time when President Emmanuel Macron has been reinforcing bilateral ties following a state visit.
“France expresses its firm disapproval of President Trump’s comments about the Paris attacks on Nov. 13, 2015 and demands that the memory of the victims be respected,” the foreign office said in a statement.
i heard trump made the sarcastic argument that we should ban trucks and vans because they're used to kill people. swear to god, no wonder he's got an 86 IQ. he argues points like a fucking 13 year old on an imageboard. you put anything in your hand and you can kill someone with it, obviously. the difference, trump (i'm assuming he reads this board, since he obviously takes his speeches from the ramblings of 13 year old idiots here) is that a vehicle was designed and made to transport people and things. guns were designed to kill people as efficiently as possible. there's big fucking difference, numbskull. try thinking for the BRIEFEST of moments before spewing crap out of your shithole and maybe you if your IQ reaches 87 you'll at least keep your idiot thoughts to yourself.
Spotted the communist with the straw man argument who hates america
As opposed to the same comment being made dead serious in the UK to van Truck rentals?
He's right you know.
Jolly golly look at the idiot!
More like neglectful parenting and teaching. Kids in my neighborhood didn't get away with shit because their parents actually gave a fuck. But if the places these kids shot up had people who were armed and understood that the only time you draw that thing is when another person has theirs drawn, it'd be fine. This means not using it to break up a fist fight. Even if the fist fight lead to death. In real life, overkill is a sin.
MOSHI GET BACK IN THE OVEN!
the fuck did i just read , he just basically said , that it should be a lesson for france , and fucking give people raifus for protection , he didnt insulted the victims , he only used their "sacrifice" as a good example , i see nothing offending here
What's an assault rifle? I've heard of intermediate caliber select fire rifles, but never "assault" rifles. Sounds like a stupid term – after all, all rifles are designed for offensive use, regardless of whether or not it has a black polymer stock and a Picatinny rail.
Are "assault rifles" the ones with the shoulder thing that goes up?
That's what an assault rifle is in the real military term. Assault Weapons is the retard clinton branded term you're looking for. Don't fall for the memoryholing attempt by the hoplophobic media.
Funny enough, places where rule of law is not a thing. Ie: Sandy shithole faled or failing countries where there are a lot of niggers, or ayyrab niggers, or afghanistan boyrapists going Aloha Snackbar.
France and the UK are mad because they know their draconian gun control laws (and other such laws) aren't working
You had one job Way to fuck it up
I thought Clinton invented the sexual assault weapon.
THIS. I wish you could say this on every single television channel in Europe and America at the same time. It is so clinically obvious, yet NO ONE is allowed to say it. When an MP in England urged for tighter immigration control within the last week, she was sacked and replaced with a fucking muslim! It is incredible. The dementia levels of these freaks, the politicians in Europe are all part of a suicide cult, and they intend to drag 300 million unwilling civilians with them. No third worlders should ever have been allowed to come to Europe, they simply do not belong and bring nothing but negative consequences with them. Any sane scientist of any field could see that this was insanity and against all reason, logic and human nature. It has destroyed the greatest civilisations in history. England is a poisoned mess now, no one wants to go near the paki and negro areas. No one enjoys seeing 50+% negroids on the aids-infected television that everyone is forced to pay for. France is being eaten alive, more and more every year. Germany is its death throes, with a massive invasion force having been thrown into it over a period of a few years. Sweden is being torn to pieces. Italy and Greece spilling over with filthy, disease ridden, 65 iq tribal war apes. None of this should have been allowed to happen. At the first sight of it, the still sane majority of MPs, seeing what was to come, should have abandoned all civility and outright killed those proposing and orchestrating it, at any personal risk. Just like the 17 year old with a sword who took out the dangerous MP on the stage. He saved his country at the cost of his own life.
I would like for you to understand that the leaders of these countries are absolutely fully aware of what is going on, and have worked tirelessly for decades to orchestrate it. They've been exposed as saying as much. The third worlder mass immigration of the 90s in England was Blair and his bunch of side show freaks.
typical britshit post kek.
They do a shit job of it. Look how many bullets it takes to actually get a confirmed kill. Look at all the "mass shootings" where the body count is fuck all. Guns are only effective when the person using them is trained properly. A van however any retard can get a bunch of kills with no effort.
Out of respect we have tied your hands behind your back so these law abiding Asian citizens can shoot you. Please be respectful.
Today I placed my Smith & Wesson .357 Mag revolver on the table right next to my front door. I left 6 cartridges beside it, then left it alone and went about my business.
While I was gone, the mailman delivered my mail, the neighbor's son across the street mowed the yard, a girl walked her dog down the street, and quite a few cars stopped at the "stop" sign near the front of my house.
After about an hour, I checked on the gun. It was quietly sitting there, right where I had left it. It had not moved itself outside. It had not killed anyone. Certainly, even with the numerous opportunities it had presented to do that. In fact, it had not even loaded itself.
Well you can imagine my surprise, with all the hype by the Left and the media about how dangerous guns are and how they kill people. Either the media is wrong, or I'm in possession of the laziest gun in the world.
The United States is 3rd in murders throughout the world. But if you take out just 5 'left-wing' cities: Chicago, Detroit, Washington D.C., St Louis and New Orleans - the United States is 4th from the bottom, in the ENTIRE WORLD, for murders.
These 5 cities are controlled by Democrats. They also have the toughest gun control laws in the USA.
It would be absurd to draw any conclusions from this data, right?
Well, I'm off to check on my spoons. I hear they're making people fat.
tbh gun laws in either way do shit, the way you stop crime is not by targetting or not targetting the tools used but to rather kill the criminals before they are born
fuck you actually got me
Not necessarily, Rabbi, but we'll never know, will we? The low IQ sandniggers in the country doesn't help, sure, but for citizens to be able to defend themselves efficiently would difinately even the odds.
U wat, mate? The exit is that way, faggot.
Shut your cock-socket m8. You're making us look bad.
Even in the Marine Corps the M16 is simply refered to as a "service rifle". I've never heard anyone call it an assault rifle, ever. It's not even as powerful as typical hunting rifles, and the 3-round burst shit is mostly a way to waste lots of ammo. Fire teams carry a machine gun, which the M16 is not, and trying to use it as one will end up jamming it or fucking up the barrel.
Have you ever looked into the history of the development of intermediate cartridge firing rifle during ww2? That's where the term originated. It's only somewhat recently in the past starting at around the 90's when leftist gungrabbing types in the government and media tries to gaslight and equate the term 'assault rifle' as the uber top tier Evil Black Rifle. Even then they're still fucktarded or tipped their hand when they try calling it Assault Weapons ie the Assault Weapons Ban. The assault rifle type was called that because it was not as powerful as the battle rifle. That's a real term as well. (The FAL, M-14, the M1 Garand, even the venerable bri'ish bolt action Enfields, would qualify as a Battle Raifu.) That is exactly correct, 5.56 or .223 would be considered intermediate, or varmint hunting round and not some full powered loudenboomer level ammo. But the gaslighting attempt is real, hence you see media faggots calling any semi auto a "Machine Gun", despite it being absolutely wrong in the factual term and definition of a real machine gun.
And yes, I'll save you the trouble of typing the rest since you know but others might not. AR-15s or any other rifle for that matter that does not have an auto or giggle switch does not qualify as an assault rifle, they're semi auto rifles. And AR is not an acronym for Assault Rifle.
What happened that made crime jump like that 98-02? I lived in London a short while in that time frame and coming from one of the cities with the highest murder rate, jolly 'ol London didnt seem that bad. But compared to crime stats just a few years before, how the fuck did crime get so bad so quick? I didn't think they were importing subhumans then, were they?
People that behave like animals drags their environment down to behave like animals as well and the quickest way to make a rabid beast lower it's head is a show of force that exclaims you're the bigger threat. These countries chose to remove their fangs so lesser predators could sink theirs in. The 17 year old who attacked with a sword is a true Patriot. The governments of the world are failing their own by putting ideals above their countrymen's human lives in order to continually secure their positions among their circle jerk. Happens in America as well.
I always assumed it was their survival instincts (to make money) misguiding their decision making and clouding their judgement. If they are intentionally bringing people in and KNEW these things would happen, they're going to get Hell. Just a matter of time. The age of Tyrants will come to an end.
Those fucking spoons are spreading disease and it's our American duty to melt them down and turn them into silver lead paint, in order to extend the lifespan of the paint when you put them on the walls inside your house.
Criminals are a by product of their environment and it's very rare for a true seed of evil to be born. Most criminals are an inner reflection of the people in their surroundings and with the advent of the TV and internet, their environment can extend beyond the reaches of their immediate local one. After all, the environment one is truly in, is their mind. If an ideal has become the world to them, they will act upon it with force.
It began appearing in video games as such a term then too. Which I'm sure help give the term its definition.
To answer your question about that borderline 90 degree jump the "Firearms Act of 1997" is more commonly referred to as "The Gun Ban". For some reason News- won't let me post the image comparing British crime stats to other comparable nations for the same time period as it's in another thread, you can find it here though.
There is no such thing as an assault rifle. The most a 16 year old can buy is a rifle, a bolt action or semi-auto.
Lead paint was banned before I was born and most houses don’t even have it today. But keep buying toys from China though
He wants guns for Europeans so they can defend themselves. Breivik relied on the fact that Europeans did not have arms in order to succeed in his mission. Ironically, Breivik would want Europeans to have arms so that they could stop not just people like him but also their government and the invading hordes of migrants.
Breivik is a great example of the failure of Norway's government.
It was sarcasm. Lead paint was used in America for a while and the corporations would fight tooth and nail in legal courts to keep it their way. It took decades of dedicated individuals in the pursuit of truth and justice to overcome the government's whore relationship with said corporations. The people working for them aren't innocent either as they continued to give them power to basically sicken their own for a fucking profit.
After thinking it over, the people working for them can be innocent if they're in a situation that doesn't provide them with an independent alternative. Something the government has failed at when it came to the education system. Boys really should be taught how to be self-reliant as if there was no government, but that never happens in public indoctrination systems.
I may have been born in the last theee decades but it wasn’t fucking yesterday. Tell it to someone who’s under 25.
In case anyone took this retard (you) nigger seriously, a 16 year old cannot legally purchase any firearm, and an assault rifle (a select fire rifle) is completely illegal unless you have a shit ton of money to jump through all of the hoops and then purchase a massively overpriced rifle from a collector.
a lot of shootings have happened in "gun free zones", thats should tell you all you need to know
That's by design.
1997/8 was both the handgun ban as well as a massive increase in immigration from the Labour party.
It's funny too because the point of such inventions, the justification, was to put evil people in line. It did work, and look what happens when you take down that psychological fence. But the fault is in all the governments of the world treating their people like a force instead of a people. Their bad.
What a coincidence that such things would start at that time.
It's honestly one that can't be defeated. Only overly sympathetic hearts can defeat sound logic, but such hearts shouldn't have a say when there is clearly evil out on the loose. They'll lose themselves in disillusionment once they realize there are irredeemable people. But those people serve a purpose in that they are a sign of an unseen corruption. They can be saved, but the variables are confounding and expensive. Better to spend chasing fake ideals and beliefs. But the people of these countries are at fault as much as their heads. The heads have no room to blame their countrymen because they treat them like a force. Not once did I see a thief go, "damn it hand! I gotta cut you off now!", but you see it with a government and it's own people as a by product of their actions. The head shouldn't be cutting off its own feet and hands, but should rather stop using them for ill intent. But the hands and feet are just as much a ruler as their government. Do they not have minds of their own? To allow an injustice in fear of the consequences is to accept evil and be compliant and an accomplish in crime. This is the state the world is heading into. Man will not govern themselves truthfully and honestly, then they will be governed by unseen forces that are known.
FUCKING DRUMPH HOW DARE HE SUGGEST EUROFAGS BE ALLOWED TO PROTECT THEMSELVES FROM THE RELIGION OF PEACE
A typical hunting rifle doesn't have an assault style clip that can hold up to a hundred ammo. Try again, trumptard.
FUCKING GROMERLD SLUARMP HOW DARE HE USE ACCURATE STATISTICS?
STATISTICS ARE RACIST AND ISLAMAPHOBIC!!!
Sure if guns prevented any. But us europeans have had an education so: - We don't live in constant fear - We don't think that giving everybody guns will make everybody safe by magic - Since we conquered nearly everybody everywhere we don't fall into autistic fits when we see one of our former subjects
Have you been to Sweden? White people are trying to get out of that hell hole.
That's the response everyone should have had to the EU's request. The EU was supposed to be for European interests. Nigerians, Syrians, and who even cares what the fuck else, are not European. There is no cause to accept them.
It absolutely is oppressive socialist dictatorial power being exercised by Brussels to make that demand of sovereign nations who had no voting authority in the make up of the leadership of the EU itself.
Holy fuck the amount of delusion in this post is astounding.
PART AND PARCEL We don't think that giving everybody guns will make everybody safe by magic TRUCKS OF PEACE Since we conquered nearly everybody everywhere we don't fall into autistic fits when we see one of our former subjects EVERYONE? AMERICA IS PROOF OTHERWISE
man, when it all comes crashing down, britshits will be the first ones to die, and that's not even being mean, that's just stating objective truth.
Not him, but it actually is only twenty round and the original design has a selective firing option. Sem-Auto is what you use when firing from a distance behind cover, fully auto is what you use in close quarters if you're a bad shot. Three round burst is a waste of ammo because all it takes to put a man down is one good shot. All these men who puff themselves up like 50 cent about being shot multiple times are simply lucky or have God giving them divine protection weather they realize it or not. Put one between their eyes and no man made science is going to save them, but that's easier said than done in an actual war zone. It's super easy when your target is unaware if you are a good shot. And considering the dangers of hunting, a gun like a m16 or a shotgun with slugs could save your life from a bear attack. Especially the slug. Normal small arms just piss them off and they maul you before they bleed out. Hit them with something that puts an exit wound wider than your arm into them and they writhe in pain like any other life would. In fact, that whole you don't need it for hunting or protection argument is completely invalid.
Wild big game will and does attack people unprovoked and do in fact take multiple shots to put down before being you are killed. The enemy will always bring their big guns and if there is more than one, you need more ammo. Or are you one of the countless drones who believes what their governments and movements preach? Because it's all empty. Look at raw unedited footage of what's been occurring in Britain and anyone with any sense can tell you that disarming your law abiding citizens OF ANY RIGHTS, is purposefully doing a disservice to your countrymen. Especially the right to protect themselves. Not even super advanced aliens can't come fast enough to stop a would be murderer and once he makes himself your problem you only have three choices. Either get killed, do as they say (they may kill you afterwards anyway), or fight.
they could have it played out like a low budget horror film and handful of concealed handgun owner in the crowed and those terrorists would of died pretty fucking fast and DEAD TERRORISTS CAN NOT SHOOT PEOPLE
That's because you're brainwashed so hard you lack foresight and have been dumped down to the memory span of a week. It's like how a capitalist is at the top of the pyramid and thinks his way of life works and can work for everyone. It's never that black and white. Fact of the matter, guns being more out in the open puts the bad seeds in a psychological state of fear. You fear because you do ill. I wouldn't because I'm rational. Feeling safe and being safe are two different things and all the government, especially in Europe have ever done to their citizens was to give them soothing words with an intent to pacify you with false words of peace. Actions speaks louder than words and when the actions of a country sees an increase in bad activity, it's time's way of revealing the truth behind an establishment. I like how the only thing your cops can do when your own citizen is being attacked by foreigners with guns is drive away in fear and shout at their police while their phone operator sits in silence, or when beatings and rapes sky rocket. Must be disinfo right? Totally ALL those snuff videos and privately uploaded videos are fake.
white party true as the the root cause
like 4 guys killed/injured all those people and hand full of hand guns on the room and the body count would of been quite significantly less…
Why are all your sources people with the same agenda?
They prevent plenty and stop plenty the media does not like to cover things contradictory to their narratives … they are also much small ordeals because they get fucking killed before they mow down masses ….
fucking word filters
Don't you ever talk shit about me or my retarded Russian son again.
I don't spread black pills. I just speak objective truth relative to memory. Nor do I care to remember links. Lurk, because the evidence is out there. The real question is, how do we legitimately solve it without the current establishment? In a manner that's not only lead by example, but in a manner that maintains peace whilst out growing your enemy into such epic proportions that no fight can be conceived out of sheer fear for the consequences? We have the manpower to repair and fix mankind, and the intellects to formulate it, but where are they? War just leads to more war. Simply a matter of time, albeit, there is no wrong in self defense or in defense of a loved one.
Oh look more artificial outrage from a soycuck "journalist" *yawn*
Just sterilize non-whites. That would have solved a lot of problems back then.