WHAT THE ACTUAL SHIT IS THIS???
Ripping Apart Jordan Peterson's Faux Intellectualism
Michael Davis
Jaxson Adams
Peterson is vague on purpose, he likes to imply things.
Jung is crap and nonsense.
Peterson is anti male and worships women, yet the people on this video try and paint him as anti female? WTF?
Brody Reyes
what the fuck are talking about?
Luke Collins
watched the video, now my YT feed is full of videos by a channel called "Social Jsutice Fails". use hooktube please.
Juan Smith
Autistic MGTOW shit, along with jacking off to Peterson.
Jordan
MAKEUP IS SEXUALY PROVOCATIVE
Peterson
Praise Allah
Charles Rivera
yeah, that's called being a stupid dick. "Anti female" and "Anti male" means being literally against 50% of the human population. Peterson isn't "against women" he's just really fucking dumb.
William Cruz
Psychoanalysis is good for manipulating people, nothing more. What happens most times when some pseud "analyses" your problems is that he's forcing your problems into his box in which he can then "solve" them.
So you have a new bunch of problems you never thought you had thanks to that pseud.
Ethan Howard
Does he really think this?
Cameron Reed
He'd tell you he doesn't know and that he's just asking questions. He asks these question in a rather aggressive way.
Hunter Carter
Hottest take: JBP shows the utter failure of leftism.
It's pretty clear that if you tell a white guy in his late teens or early twenties who has trouble getting laid that he isn't worthless, he'll sign onto whatever political program you push at him. You can make him a libertarian, a fascist, a monarchist, etc. You can make him praise the enlightenment, and you can make him regurgitate pseudo-jungian platitudes. The only thing you apparently can't make him do is read Marx. I don't like self-pitying incels, but there's no reason to ignore them to the point where "incel" is basically synonymous with "supporter of white identify politics."
And don't give me any "leftists should focus on attracting normal people instead" bullshit. Unless you're talking about the increased support for a few socdem policies in the US, we fucking suck at attracting normies too.
He wouldn't tell you that he doesn't know. He'd frame his response in a way that shows the question is trivially true, like pointing out that women wear makeup to be attractive. Of course that isn't the only reason they wear makeup, but it's besides the point. Leftist idiots like you would inevitably attack his true, factual claim rather than the absurd implications he derives from the claim. Reactionaries would point out that you denied something which everyone knows to be true.
That's how redpilling works. Redpilling is only possible because """""""""""""""""""""""leftists""""""""""""""""""""""" deny uncomfortable facts, like the racial composition of pedophile grooming groups, rather than attack the policy that reactionaries support based off of those facts, like an ethnic cleansing of Muslims.