Are modern ☭TANKIE☭ parties in the Western World now just glorified re-enactment groups...

he was a slav

He was Georgian you dolt.

Um, sweetie :)

Attached: Kim_Il_Sung_Portrait-2.jpg (600x758, 104.76K)

Yes. I was in the PSL for a bit. They are Stalin fanboys.

Based BO.

Not all Leninists are tanks fam.

Are there even any legitimate leftist parties in the West or are we stuck with entryist shit and Democrat Cops of America

CPGB (male)

Attached: Hosseinqoli.jpg (313x600, 54.19K)

Tankies getting any traction within the west is as possible as the Sonic fanbase ceasing to be autistic.
You're more likely to see them in the third world, and given the material conditions.

Years of anti-communist propaganda have demonised what the USSR did, and even if you were to call it state-capitalist, it can't be denied that given the evidence we have, it certainly wasn't a hell-hole and was a better place to live in than the US and I say that as an anarchist.
You'd probably see more lib-soc organisations or the occasional trot org which has split from another trot org. The likelyhood of first worldist socialists wanting to repeat the bureaucracy or revisionism of these ML revolutions is unlikely, wether it's out of theory/ praxis/ culture or misinterpretations of what the USSR was.

Also the way that tanks (and I know it's not all of you) go about supporting or expressing solidarity with reactionary governments in the face of """imperialism""" while claiming you are socialists might also be the case. It may surprise you, but the US isn't the only imperialist power that has its eyes on the worlds resources.

Attached: 7a5acdee92e09d9db0ec0c2fa99e2a55a24fa968.png (1920x1080, 1.68M)

there's nothing wrong with that. if you think there's something wrong with that then go suck down more american propoganda, you don't belong here.

Tankies need to relax and just realize that Imre Nagy was a pretty cool dude.

Attached: k8xyC.jpg (1000x1218, 582.82K)

Stalin was half arab half white. Trust me, i'm a race pro!

Council communism is fascism, suck a dick

tfw you fight for the red army, inform for the NKVD, redistribute land to the peasants and reform agriculture once again after the people revolt because you were a better leader than Khrushchev's puppet, but you're a fascist because you want some reforms.

Attached: Nagy_Imre_igazolványkép.jpg (479x581, 120.29K)

/thread tbh

If you don't want to be accused of being fascist, stop employing fascist goons in your "revolution"

I'm not Nagy btw, but if you don't want a revolution, don't replace a competent, popular communist leader with a Khrushchevite butcher.

read a book, faggots

Attached: 78e6cb8288f0765300a1d0d22d595471a7c38a15.png (579x377, 225.65K)

partijarada.org/partyoflabour/
there is this in my country
but they aren't really presented at all
and I don't think they can do much, but it's something

This post has just proven so many points…

see
haha, totally owned these liberals! my flawless argumentation leaves them speechless

Kek,

the "toiling masses" you commie hardliners always refer to were rising up against the Soviet domination. But only in Stalinism can the actual masses of working people be turned into "fascist goons" in a matter of a party decree.

Kys, ☭TANKIE☭ scum.

Attached: dafuq.jpg (232x230, 6.32K)

i wonder where this guy's coming from
hmmm

Attached: reallymakesyouthink.jpg (950x751, 211.96K)

And you can thank the stalinoid hardliners coup attempt later that year that finnaly destroyed the idea of a "democratised Soviet Union" as envisioned in the referendum.

Attached: pesci.jpg (219x138, 7.24K)

what's up with liberals and their idea that reality bends to them if they just keep pushing the line of how retarded they can go in their fantasy world?

and btw, notice the framing of the question; "Do you consider it necessary to preserve the USSR as a renewed federation of equal sovereign republics, which will be fully ensured human rights and freedoms of any nationality?" - As opposed to what? Leaving it as it is? Naturally people opted for the "preservation with reforms"! The people who were in charge of writing the question knew exactly that the Soivet Union in it's form back then was lacking freedoms and respect for human rights – so the questions are intelligently designed as an admission that NO, the Soviet Union is NOT democratic,NEITHER does it respect human rights of nationalities, BUT would you nonetheless consider preserving it IF it would FULLY ENSURE that freedoms and rights are to be respected?

You aren't fucking stupid not to see this, are you?

Attached: them.jpg (250x248, 8.93K)

This thread tbh

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (798x532, 412.12K)

yeah, totally got me there, lol
it's cute when they suddenly try to read to find a way out and it's still fucking nothing

Attached: 433fdd48fb1d22de104bfb33b66d97067dcb5c1a.jpg (1102x1103, 190.46K)

keep defening Khrushchev you revisionist piece of shit. Imre Nagy was the only bolshevik who actually did something against the bastaridazation of Lenin's and Stalin's legacy.

This fucking spooked retard again crying about "russian imperialism". Fucking lol you subversive revisionists are scum.

oh, so russia is imperialist? china as well? woah, mind fucking blown, if only i had ever considered!

good thing this isn't just a complete strawman based on your misconceptions you created because reading is hard and authoritarians are evil
this way you clearly taught me how wrong i am, i hereby denounce Marxism Leninism!

now let's jerk off to rene girls, shit on door steps and flip off cops, the revolution is coming, i can see it now!

*farts*

accurate description of your reading comprehension

editionsdelga.fr/portfolio/grover-furr/
read Khrushchev lied to Grover Furr

I'm just playing.

Attached: tanky_trot.png (500x756, 393.67K)