At what point do you call a conservative a reactionary?

(checked)
only correct answer in thread

When the conservative starts attempting to roll back progress, starts waxing poetic about some real or imagined former social order and wants to bring said social order back, and fear mongers about some malignant outside force that supposedly destroyed said utopian former social order.

Or, in short, all conservatives can be called reactionaries.

conservatism is inherently reactionary

Actual conservatives generally view societal progress as a good thing; they just are stubborn about moving their feet, and tend to believe the status quo is, at the very least, better than radical action. Liberals basically fall in this point most often, but it's not a stance which is inherently bad. For instance, I would say that I am a conservative in nature, but socialism or barbarism amiright. Reactionaries explicitly believe that the current/past society was the most idea, while Fascists propose to restore society to that point in time. The reactionaries are mostly delusional, and will fail just as their past ideals did (if they even actually existed).

Basically:

A reactionary is like a progressive but they try to regress instead of progress. This means they will use government policy to try to halt and reverse changes to society and government.

For ignorant commies, most "conservatives" are liberals like Burke. But instead of rapid progressive change they want to bring it about much more slowly. A lot of "conservatives" are actually progressive.

Conservatism is reactionary. Some ☭TANKIE☭s and nazghouls try to use gymnastics and quote mining for it to extend to other things.

ALL BABOONS IN ZOOS

I think a sensible threshold for 'reactionary' is when one starts advocating for organized religion for purely secular reasons.
t. reactionary

Attached: maialmly-memri-tv-he-is-even-worse-than-a-jew-22634712.png (500x375, 73.16K)

(checked)

Attached: 1516466594845.png (477x556, 709.13K)