We did it reddit

Where’s the NazBol Picardia meme where it says that NazBol’s purpose is to convert people to the right and left but all that happens is a Communist ethnostate (I want to puke)

Lol

Wait this is in an article about bloc identitaire though…

CIGAM EMEM

Attached: nazbol catgirl 4.png (692x900, 395.78K)

NAZBOL PARTY ITS THE GANG FOR YOU AND ME

Attached: F3ED6800-A0EC-4F36-9752-9A5C3172E9DF.jpeg (1600x965, 61.57K)

GANG
GANG
GANG

Nazbol is the only way we can beat the aut-right. It's basically a "sticky trap" for edgy always-online teens who would normally be anime nazis. The "movement" itself has no actual IRL presence and is largely harmless, which is what we want. The kids can meme all they want and not actually end up as IRL nazis.

Attached: glue trap34.jpeg (2576x1932, 810.27K)

THIS WILL NOT BE TOLERATED

Attached: JUUUCHEGANG.png (1350x759, 1.81M)

Isn't it funny how you can say kill the capitalist bourgeoisie, destroy the sate etc and the elite won't bat an eye. But tell that you want ethnic self determination and they freak the fuck out.

Probably because "ethnic self determination" usually involves a large degree of class collaboration, which is bad.

But wouldn't the elite/bourgeoisie want to push for class collaboration so that their system remains stable?

But now we get infected by losers using mental gymnastics to make nationalism and communism compatible. I think that this will only come back to bite us in the ass. Trying to trick people into being a non-threat or a comrade just leads to a "Frankenstein's monster" situation.

Does this basically prove there is some kind of porky PSYOP to promote Nazbolism online?

Attached: Screenshot_20170917_142509.png (231x415, 97.69K)

Wrong, you do that shit and they do freak the fuck out: look how the press deal with reformists like Corbyn or Melenchon. Heck even AMLO gets accused of wanting to implement a dictatorship.

well… shit

They ignore them? I have not seen one article attacking them or praising them. But when Richard Spencer does anything public the entire western media freaks the fuck out.

Just try to compare the result ratio by searching for Corberyn, Melenchon or AMLO with Richard Spencer in your google news feeds. A nobody like Spencer with no political affiliation trumps all of them combined.

Nagle did say 2018 will be the year of NAZBOL…

Attached: 708f7d836315b844b7d123ee4b4fd9e8d2693218.png (500x500, 143.63K)

I'm not keeping up with e celeb dramas but why is everyone claiming that nagle is for Nazbol?

When liberal media is so shit i can't tell if they didn't bother googling nazbol to find limonov and the actual nazbol movemnt or if they are just manipulating nazbol in to being something new.

Except that the media has no problem giving a platform to the aut-rightists, and there was a wave of news articles last year that were openly sympathetic to them- the outcry against them comes mainly from normal people, even if its mostly just idpol liberals. Hell, even the recent Florida shooter has a number of articles about how he only did it because he was bullied and he dindu nuffin. More importantly, there's some very big money like the Mercers funding and astroturfing for the aut-right, while you will never see that happening for the far left.

U wot m8? The Bong media has been attacking Jezza constantly, including claims that he's an anti-semite due to his criticism of Israel, and during the French election when polls seemed to indicate that Melenchon might make it to the second round the media started shitting on him and even praising LePen, hilariously trying to play up some feminist angle about how she was "breaking the glass ceiling" and such.

Most normal people know who Corbyn is. You cannot say the same for Spencer. Of course, you wouldn't know because you don't actually talk to normies.

Its more like said, leftists who criticize the system as a whole do get labeled as either being privileged or being racist or being "ignorant" of social issues.

Can you post evidence of this wave of new articles who were pro-alt right?

We had a thread about this some months ago. For example, if you search for Bolshevik flag on google, most results are variations of the nazbol flag.

Can you post evidence of this wave of new articles who call for killing the capitalist bourgeoisie and destroying the state?

economist.com/news/britain/21721916-shadow-chancellors-comment-provoked-scorn-yet-marx-becomes-more-relevant-day-labour
Unironically.

Where's my Hitler is right article on CNN?

Journalism once again proves to be worst career ever besides lawyer. When will they learn?

Attached: are you serious.gif (228x160, 194.04K)

Not only is this article not calling for the physical elimination of the bourgeoisie, it also grossly misunderstand and misrepresents Marx's arguments.

forbes.com/sites/ccap/2017/09/01/karl-marx-was-right/#3097a0761fe6

Here's another one.

It's not hard looking at pro-leftist tabloid on the net.

When did she say that?

Neoliberal rags begrudgingly admitting that Marx did have a point has nothing to do with advocating a violent revolution — don't move the goalpost. Do you seriously believe the Economist and Forbes are secretly socialist magazines?

Well, Marx advocated for violent revolution.
I dunno, I just don't see why the fuck they have to publish Marx is right articles all over.

As said, where's my Hitler is right article on CNN?

Hitler was a brainlet whose only published book was pseudo-biographical rather than academically; considering this, it's hard for the news to exalt "hitlar was right" when he gave them so little to work with.

A more apt comparison in the mind of a typical westerner is Hitler = Stalin, and I doubt you'll ever find a western rag painting him in a positive light either. (and this is not for the same reasons I exposed though, as Stalin did elaborate on the theory of ML on various texts)

Attached: 1013.png (157x162, 40.51K)

Nolte mainstreamed the "Hitler was kinda right" in historiography in Germany in the 1980s. Most anti-communist works and propaganda borrow from fascist and White Russian propaganda and literature wholesale–usually without attribution. Even woke twitter democrats who are totally idpozzed take cues from fascist propaganda and talking points when it comes to Russia:
lorenzoae.wordpress.com/2017/10/11/on-russia-todays-liberals/

Timmy Snyder does regular columns in the NYT hailing the "double-genocide" thesis and arguing that Stalin killed more people than Hitler and so on.

Capitalists don't want the guilt by associated with Hitler because they know most workers, especially in the US despise Nazi Germany.

So it's not leftist to say Marx was right, but it's right-ish to say Hitler was right, okay.

So in short, they still don't say Hitler was right, yet they can say Marx was right in mainstream publication.

Are you autistic or something? Like you have to have everything spelled out for you and can't read between the lines? They don't need to say it they imply it.

You can write articles praising any number of fascist or reactionary intellectuals such as Oswald Spengler for instance who I actually kinda like and there's no real penalty for that. If it was a mainstream article that said "Stalin was right" that would be different since Stalin was a politician who held state power whereas Marx was just a theorist. You know in the field of economics there are a lot of mainstream capitalist economists who willingly admit he got some things right even if they think he was wrong about everything else.
nature.com/news/who-is-the-best-scientist-of-them-all-1.14108

Just because you're a brainlet that doesn't understand Marx doesn't mean there's a conspiracy.

Likewise, even if you were to admit that everything Hitler said about communism was right, the fact that he embarked on a genocidal crusade against Jews and Slavs just doesn't play well. His plans to kill and displace up to 100 million slavs to colonized Russia for Germany is rather unique in the fucked up history of humanity. The occupation of Europe by the Germans, the colonial plans in Africa, the extreme racialist belief that the world should be ruled exclusively by "Aryans" and Hitler does not mean merely white people here doesn't really play well to who isn't already a convinced Nazi. If Nazis weren't such brainlets they would know that Hitler welcomed the prospect of a "anuddah shoah" in Australia that he expected to be carried out by imperial Japan–the fact that Australians, being largely descendants of "Arynan"
Britons met his racial qualifications didn't seem to phase him.

Nazis have no one to blame but themselves for the fact that Nazism has become taboo in the mainstream. It isn't like other types of fascist apologism doesn't exist in the mainstream media–pic related.

Attached: SuhartoinTime.jpg (602x800, 222.52K)

Saying Marx had some observations which made sense for his time that we can incorporate in improving "liberal democracy" isn't leftist as you are still advocating for capitalism and is what most liberal articles that mention him do. Straight up saying "Hitler was right" is saying you agree with all of Hitlers assessments and that Fascism needs to implemented in addition to the expulsion of any ethnic jews. Also, comparing an economist who wrote economic analysis and theories and died from bronchitis caused by air pollution to a political leader who led the Nazi's in Germany and waged war against most of Western and Eastern Europe is disingenuous.

You write a lot for not admitting that they can't say Hitler was right.

And no, Marx was the man behind communism, not Stalin, stop deflecting.

OK, so can you give me some articles saying Hitler was some observations which made sense for his time, like those articles for Marx did?

And these are all the pop journals that you try to say that are secretly nazi fascists, yet they can't say Hitler was right.

MARX WAS NOT A POLITICIAN

No. Marx was a legitimate political and economic theorist who made long, complex analyses of society and the economy. Hitler was a coked up retard who could barely get through a sentence in his pathetically short and lame manifesto without incoherently rambling about da joos. Thus, you will find that even liberal economists eyeball-deep in ideology will tend to take Marx more seriously. That being said, even this is often simply illusory. Read the green text in , the article is just a lazy misrepresentation of Marx's arguments.

I warned you all about this
It starts as a joke and then becomes real and it'll be worse than any meme we could made

Attached: 1520351060.png (615x263, 179.8K)

If Marx and Engels hadn't existed it would have been someone else. Maybe the work wouldn't have been good and maybe a solid theoretical critique of capitalism would have taken longer to emerge but it would have happened.

Socialism existed before Marx, he admitted this freely, and Engels pointed out that utopian "communist visions" had appeared during the Peasants War in Germany, the English Civil War and the French Revolution. French utopian socialist literature was already pretty well-developed before Marx showed up and Owenism applied the advanced developments of English political economy to the prospect of socialism before Marx showed up. None of these developments were able to piece everything together in the way that Marx did but Marx also lived in a time of rapid capitalist growth and development that his forebears did not have the benefit of. The working class was was already engaging in class struggle and embracing revolutionary change before Marx showed up, he merely recognized this contradiction and created a theory around it.

As I said before, you can quote many intellectuals who were forefathers of German "national socialism" approvingly. I wouldn't expect you to know who any of those people are, but rest assured Hitler did not pull all of his ideas out of thin air.

So in short:
NOT LEFTIST!!!!!!!
THEY ARE RACIST NAZI FASCISTS

Yep, makes sense to me.

NAZBOL IS NAZBOL GANG

Attached: 429539f136c86c9d257f40c3e6e824357b3530a0.jpg (878x483 17.44 KB, 24.54K)

Well, of course it wouldn't…you're a tard, the only praise-worthy thing about Hitler is that under his regime people like you would be put out of their misery!
ushmm.org/outreach/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007683

You have shitton of right wingers who praise Hitler.

Just liberals who fear PR who don't, and the leftists who are terrified of him.

Too bad he was bullied to death by leftists…

Attached: deadnazi.jpg (2609x2089, 472.95K)

Yeah, leftists such as the great Stalin, who banned homosexuality and deported jews.

Sounds pretty based to me

Attached: stalinbong.jpg (398x400, 125.6K)

Yeah, I'm down with "leftists" like that too.

Especially ones who prop up big nationalized corporations that are are conveniently converted to private properties as soon as communism is over.

This. Great man. Loved his mother too

Attached: stalin-freedom.jpg (480x335, 34.39K)

nazbol is basically just Zig Forums but less retarded

keyword being "less"

It's not our fault Hitler is so much of a brainlet even libshits can't find a nugget in all his excrement.

Find a better idol my dude.

Attached: e917a9707ecceda70d5e14f5b0a5ca3327b49fb7e74997e0b90921fa5fd0a4f3.jpg (1403x1008, 342.2K)

Stellar take. Clearly you can't possibly refer to an author without embracing every idea they have historically promoted! That's why economists who mention Pareto efficiency are secretly all Mussolinian fascists.
Marx mostly wrote analysis of capitalism. The Economist and Forbes are simply a century late in realizing some of his observations were undeniably accurate, whether you actually support capitalism or not.

mediaite.com/online/twitter-rips-nyt-for-report-on-the-nazi-sympathizer-next-door-what-the-hell-is-this/

Marx was a social scientist before he was a revolutionary organizer. In books such as Capital, he made descriptive observations — not political prescriptions. People who believe some of these might have been accurate do not necessarily embrace socialism — case in point, the Economist or Forbes who support neo-liberalism. Hitler's main contribution on the other hand is a decade of state policy. People who believe they were legitimate are supportive of the national-sociälist ideology. It's not rocket science.

wait till the normies find out about national anarchism, maoism third worldism, strasssss erism, neo monarchists, and all the other special snowflake ideologies

New york times will be the first to write about posadism

Attached: posadist 4th worldist.jpg (750x566, 75.57K)

No nigger. Not at all. Nowhere in my post did i call Hitler racist, and I explicitly said that the article didn't approve Marx, it was simply a twisted misintepretation to advocate capitalism. Get an argument or GTFO

Been there done that

Attached: levels.jpg (304x603, 49.74K)

Attached: 1493932284223.png (612x476, 295.87K)

they talk about him to misinterpret him

didn't happen

Attached: 9826f452db61b0154a1b231497958f49836651f3d6051b04132520ac097d118f.png (700x467, 40.13K)

hitler was completely illiterate in economics, there's a reason why his published "works" are spread to mock and expose his own ideas, if you want praise for hitler just take any imperialism apologetic articles, that's as close as it'll get
also

Attached: bkf7qyln3ejz.jpg (960x960, 25.4K)

Imagine how popular national bolshevism would be in the United States if there was anything at all to like about this shit heap

American Antifa in level 1, North EU Antifa in level 2, Greek Antifa in level 3

nytimes.com/2017/07/24/opinion/make-it-so-star-trek-and-its-debt-to-revolutionary
It already happened, comrade.
syfy.com/syfywire/ufos-dolphins-nuclear-war-and-communism-the-stranger-than-sci-fi-political-party
vice.com/en_us/article/dpw5aj/posadism-trotskyism-guillermo-almeyra-interview-876
These also happened.

this probably isnt gonna end well

Attached: kuterty.jpg (3000x2250, 776.38K)

Stop this nonsence! As someone who is Russian, Nazbol was a real and, quite important thing. IT doesn't mean Nationalist Bolshevism (or Nazi Bolshevism), but rather Nationalists and Bolsheviks (Although pretty every of the whole spectrum of radical movements come from Nazbol)

Hitler literally had no theory to be right about

Horzbol ftw fam tbh

Attached: Horzbol_individualism_fashwave_gang.gif (640x426, 369.57K)

Wrong, the Jewish question is a theory Hitler echoes.

Good jorb anons.

Attached: runescape laugh.jpg (817x857, 60.29K)

you guys are so pathetic

This will be the year of nazbol, mark my words globalists

Attached: chandra bose nazbol.jpg (223x360 378.39 KB, 131.56K)

nazbol gang gone mainstream

So they defeated us?

this seems outdated, all the ☭TANKIE☭s think China is socialist these days and Maoism is unpopular

CHAD

Attached: nazbolnigs.jpg (580x378, 53.05K)

youtu.be/KqjQQ70u7mo

PROGRESSIVE WHITE JUCHE

Attached: _autistic_screeching__by_maxstrass-dbftayd.png (451x362, 102.38K)

I am pretty sure everything I disagree with is a psyop so that seems probable.

THE FIRE RISES
for real tho boys wtf

Attached: 2c176ceb69d67ae151ed886696dd0ee01195d37991b6c0d8fbdcbb10d6a3a0af.jpg (1280x1000 50.67 KB, 31.79K)

Nazbol is actual cancer.

Debord is just a cheap, drunk version of Adorno tbh. D&G should just be a part of post-structuralism.

Attached: 1500149691310.png (785x757, 48.04K)

You've never actually read Mein Kampf, the references to Jews are scarce as fuck.

Everything you just said used to applied to nazis 8 years ago. "See, it worked", yes, white supremacists got themselves a movement that destroyed itselve in two years.