Anarchism: reactionary to the core

Remind me why anarchists are considered leftist again? Anarchism was a utopian right wing proto-fascist movement from the get go. Proudhon, Bakunin, and Makhno were explicit antisemites. Kropotkin was a chauvinistic nationalist. Early fascism was heavily inspired by anarchism. Look up Sorel, Futurism, Cercle Proudhon etc.

This utopian drivel has no place among the radical left. As Marxists, we can do better.

Attached: anarchism.png (640x427, 47.57K)

Other urls found in this thread:

libcom.org/history/anti-semitism-makhnovists-michael-malet
nestormakhno.info/english/makfaq/h_6_9.htm
marxism.halkcephesi.net/Grover Furr/Furr tortsky japan.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

...

anarchists are stalinists

sp00ky. You sound like a Zig Forumsfag when they apply jewish characteristics to things. For example:
is normal. but when a jew does it:
^This is what you sound like. Trotfags >>>/out/.
Faggots were heavily inspired by OP's shitpost. Look up OP, Trotsky, Trots, (You), etc.

Attached: a17e4a9c16fbbd5f8960f3151c85fc8f3e7195ee4da193f59e612f16c1353d07.png (733x950, 554.97K)

...

The Trot cries out in pain as he splits you

THE TROT CRIES OUT IN PAIN

Attached: theone.jpg (1536x1217, 204.41K)

Didn't they just steal their aesthetic?

Shut up faggot.

Attached: c9216b47bf4ca8bd32aa70757f8ae66208503c0dd4b210d01367dd1648fe1a83.jpg (884x757, 258.31K)

Makes me want to make a post "Trotskyism: reactionary to the core"

Attached: newman.png (215x288, 71.46K)

i'll grab the popcorn

Attached: 5da902c46d316443e074ff06d297a2ed9d4a6475.png (273x252, 107.92K)

*National Anarchists block your path*

Had a good laugh.
That pic is fake though, btw.

thats THE icepick. the one trotsky was killed with. according to the guardian.

latter one can be explained but no blood? he was either some fucking alien, which would explain things, like his weird fucking head shape and hair, but it might also be a complete fake

or maybe they just cleaned it lmao

Next I bet you're gonna say ancaps are anarchists, too.

maybe those spots of rust are where the blood was.
or, yknow,

it's just a joke

Attached: 1520516931609.jpg (313x334, 28.04K)

...

Trotsky was the one who collaborated with fascists

...

no surprises there. Now let me take an ice pic to your bullshit


Of that I won't deny, but Marx also hated the Slavs. Should we therefore neglect views that were held to be acceptable?
Makhno had anti semites shot and he expressed repeatedly that Jews were not to be targeted.
libcom.org/history/anti-semitism-makhnovists-michael-malet
nestormakhno.info/english/makfaq/h_6_9.htm

Proofs? Because all I see is Kropotkin looking at various different ethnic groups acting differently due to culture.

character and on which it impresses its own stamp, so as to make an indivisible whole both men and
territory” (Kropotkin 1885).

Mind you, Kropotkin was living under later 19th to early 20th century norms.

Syndicalism isn't limited to anarchism. Look to DeLeonism you retard. Are they fascists too? Besides, Rudolf Rocker already made the ground for Anarcho-syndicalism, thus making your connection to it moot.
Futurism literally existed as an art movement which wanted to smash the ways of the old and introduce the world to a new age of advanced machinery while holding contempt for women. Wanting to have a few rising wages doesn't mean squat.
Who?
Mutualists are already a meme, as markets are fucking stupid. But anarcho-collectivism/communism/ syndicalism can't really be categorised as fascist.
Should we therefore become all like foucault, who left marxist groups because he deemed them to be racist?
Now make like a trot and split.

Attached: 6f97066745f049ece5377da164d8d3f779e0a359.png (1276x509, 244.04K)

Marx's life's mission was criticizing other socialists

Also funny you should accuse anarchists of being a reactionary, despite Trotsky collaborating with… reactionaries

marxism.halkcephesi.net/Grover Furr/Furr tortsky japan.pdf

Attached: 08713596a084b808f9d4714bf00a60eefa6c2191.png (1048x892, 1.02M)

*should we therefore neglect all views from Marx because they were held to be acceptable during the time he was around?

Aren't you an incel?

You never presented a counter to OP, you literally just called him gay

a): Thats not hte poster you think it is
b): This is an anonymous board
c): As the one im pretty sure you are thinking of- No.

All I know is some autist with a sage name-field and an ancom flag was making my night in that thread, gold tier rage

Anonymous forum, user.
The four ancoms at the beginning of this thread arent one posster.

that red sage isnt the name field

Aren't you an ad hom?

I did counter OP you just chose to ignore me. Fuck off.

...

You, in fact, did not.

...

Yes, in fact, I did.
see:

agree with OP anarchists should all go back to >>>/liberty/ tbh

Attached: images.png (268x188, 67.25K)