Gaddafi the anarchist?

Is Gaddafi's thought a bridge between anarkiddies and ☭TANKIE☭s? Can we meme Gaddafi to get anarchists to stop shilling for R*j*v*?

Attached: e3bf3c7168e2ca3715dd4610bdca75fe.jpg (900x1380, 100.99K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=9O2-DMTmGuY
foreignpolicyjournal.com/2013/01/12/gaddafis-libya-was-africas-most-prosperous-democracy/
ekurd.net/mismas/articles/misc2010/11/state4343.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

But isn't this precisely what Democratic Confederalism is about? Did Gaddafi google Bookchin?

My guy should never have died.

What Gaddafi "advocated" in the Green Book had very little to do with the reality of life in Libya under his rule.

I bet you think that he dindu nuffin and the civil war was simply the product of foreign subversion rather than actual domestic unrest caused by genuine grievances among the people.

Pro tip: it was both. And before I get banned I would like to say that they were definitely better off under Gadaffi and I don’t support the rebels or NATO meddling, but to suggest that his regime didn’t have serious flaws is delusional.

"Wah wah, disagreeing with me means you're a liberal cuck idpol pomo imperialist scab cia [buzzwords continue]", or the heart-wrenching wailings of the upset tankië. How embarrassing!
"Non-Marxian socialism" is a codeword for "Fascism with vaguely socialist-sounding rhetoric".

I think the best way to start this meme warfare against the anarchist menace is to find quotes where he supports decentralization and post them to Zig Forums, /anarcho/ and r/anarchism. Maybe throw in something like


Bookchin googled Gaddafi but forgot to google his stance on the US and Israel

Gaddafi shilled for Kurdish independence as well
youtube.com/watch?v=9O2-DMTmGuY

Funny considering the PKK has fought Israel in the past and is fighting NATO right now.

reported for imperialism

Gaddafi is pretty cool. His country was more democratic than the West, for sure.
foreignpolicyjournal.com/2013/01/12/gaddafis-libya-was-africas-most-prosperous-democracy/

Attached: libya-democracy.jpg (460x460, 82.21K)

PKK =/= Bookchin

Supporting Kurdish nationalism doesn't mean he'd support hosting US bases in Syria.


They fought Israel before they were infested with Bookchinism. It's nice that they're fighting Turkey but at the end of the day, whoever wins is going to serve US imperialism.

national liberation without a strong ML movement to support it is unsustainable
syria at least has a popular front government with communists participating to keep it somewhat in check, the only thing that kept it from falling apart
libya didn't have that

Attached: c1f9d387bf50b1cb6401ee9cd2fd2f533c805bd81906f369a22f6cd2c307a208.png (2768x1256, 169.49K)

they're only a bunch of retards failing at 4 dimensional chess, not grasping the situation, being played by the only member in NATO that actually has any weight, the USA
them now being confronted by the other NATO member turkey isn't them "fighting NATO", it's a desperate attempt to damage control their own fuck up of opening the doors to them by acting as a further destabilizing factor, again all in the interest of the ones calling the shots in the NATO
reminder, that's the USA, not Turkey

you rojovaists are fucking deluded retards putting you down is a favor to yourself
drink bleach anytime

At least read a fucking Wikipedia page before sperging on about something you don't understand

He also talked about retarded supernatural bullshit and essences of shit.
Hes a tard who had some good ideas.

First off, the PKK isn’t being supported by the US. Second, the Y P G has done more than just fight Turkey, it has regularly collaborated with Assad and is being supported by Russia. Calling them a US proxy because they are accepting US support doesn’t make any sense, since by that logic they would also be a Russian proxy. The simple fact is that they are clearly pursuing their own interests independently of foreign powers, and basically every aspect of their behaviour demonstrates this.

Attached: gaddafi on true democracy.png (1080x1080, 779.86K)

Hello akhe
Don't you know that gaddafi actually requested from the soviet embassy to give them a translated book for the anarchists such as bakunin , the bread guy and etc? But they refused to do that
Later he orderd that from the british embassy and they did translated and gave the translated works to him
He even read Marxist-Leninist litreature , even sadam hussein read Stalin alot
but they wasn't communists for sure ,actually the melted all the communist opposition in acid liquid or throw their dead bodies in the sewers
Hope that be an informative reply from your arab comrade user :)

here's some pictures I have no idea how accurate they are

Attached: Myths Gaddafi.png (1250x1312 301.66 KB, 240.52K)

The first one has had debunked points, but a lot of the benefits (like the farming ones) are legit, or were at one point.
That second one is fucking boomerbook tier.
Third one uses US dollar prices, that makes no fucking sense.
Fourth seems pretty possible actually, there's a reason France Leeroy Jenkins'ed into Mali.
Fifth seems to counter the first, but I know the farming thing was legit so it is also not 100% correct.
TL;DR: Destroying the Kiddaffi regime was imperialism, but things weren't peachy in Libya as some would make out.
Regardless Saif Al-Islam Kiddaffi is about to come back and fix the place.

RHVA doesn't really have much choice in the matter.

Yes they do lol, they could ally with the Syrian government against the US in exchange for some sort of limited autonomy (which Assad has offered, though I doubt he'll be as accommodating now as he would a few years ago).

The Assad government is doing exactly that right this second, which is exactly why the Kurds have never explicitly endorsed separation from Syria.

Oh come on, how much of the civil war was genuine unrest? 10%? The US had been planning a coup in Libya since the 1970s, and prior to the intervention CIA had been funding and arming insurgents.

Daily reminder, Qaddafi's last words were to his enemies; "what did i ever do to you?"

Attached: Muammar Qaddafi.jpg (620x465, 46K)

old gaddafi looks …. fuckin weird …but he has his own style

if you suddenly became a dictator , dont you think you may be more like him than stalin ?

Attached: _51297797_51297796.jpg (600x340 19.86 KB, 22.76K)

The documentary hypernormalisation actually follows the scapegoating of Gaddafi from the seventies on. Well worth a watch. Deep geopolitical shit.

Gaddafi supported over a dozen US military bases in Syria newfag.

Then don't share them you absolute mong. For God's sake, we have stooped as low as Zig Forums.

sad answer:
not enough, evident by their presence
poor man

Really piques my pecans

Attached: gaddafi.jpg (1600x1066, 218.22K)

probably was talking about that pan-arab idea he later dropped that must've somehow involved the kurds

We keep telling you this isn't the case, and have given you resources to state it isn't.

But in regards to Gadaffi have you got the green book?
God I hope so. I'd say democratic confederalism would be a good alternative as it was made by a former ML. But if it can be the bridge between Leninists and Anarchists I'd gladly throw my hat in.

He was supportive of the Kurds, that is guaranteed.
ekurd.net/mismas/articles/misc2010/11/state4343.htm

sorry, we actually have theory and principles
the green book has none
so you can have it for yourself

Wew.
Have you actually read the green book?

...

Cheers, comrade

So far I'm reading

So far I'm enjoying this. Question is, how did Gadaffi implement these ideas in practice?

Also, Bookchinist-Gadaffi Confederalism when?

Attached: Muammar-Gaddafi-1.jpg (600x530, 24.71K)

All of the arguments you've listed are indistinguishable from that of the far-right since the late 19th century. If all it takes for you to be intellectually wowed is some century-old platitudes about how parliamentarism is corrupt, you just might be a brainlet.

Attached: 15590470_1824415187843586_796845783482792826_n.jpg (480x324, 9.86K)

Attached: 10471559-puzzled-man-at-computer-shrugs-shoulders-and-expresses-lack-of-knowledge.jpg (1300x863, 80.08K)

Attached: the final step.png (1080x1079, 1.04M)

Time to invade the US.

You do realize that monomaniac opposition to parliamentary democracy is what led many French socialists to ally with or even join pro-war nationalist parties or antisemitic leagues out of a sense of shared commitment, right?

I don't see how this is related to gadaffi by any stretch. On top of that, if you are ACTUALLY reading the book he advocates for direct democracy. On top of that, those leftists actually gave an alternative which gadaffi has done, and has criticised the parliament for being authoritarian and a dictatorship in it of itself.

Which is why I asked if he implemented these ideas in practice
as seen in

Feelings mutual you retarded fucking faggot.

...

That's meaningless when it comes to R*j*v*. He also supported Arab unity but that doesn't mean he liked Jordan or the United Arab Emirates.


You mean like the IRA?

it can always have interesting elements, and you can get people like
who will review them. even if I don't necessarily take everything for their word, the first picture I saw about Gaddafi, #3, unironically "made me think". I had never heard about these things. and don't tell me you've always checked every single source of every informative pictures you've ever posted.

Source?

I highly doubt you support the IRA. They were supplied by the Nazi's in wwii.
The Nazi's are worst than America so you have to have the same opinion of them.

That's where you're wrong kiddo