Political Violence Against the Rich

Simple question: How do we manifest political violence against the rich, and other people upholding capitalism without bringing legal troubles upon ourselves? Thanks.

Attached: pirate.gif (720x230, 2.32M)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio
marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1902/sep/01.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Post-ironic meta-sarcastic memetic warfare.

Attached: fbipepe.png (796x934, 276.36K)

wait for people to become poor

we won't have to wait long, within 5-10 years the student debt crisis will spiral totally out of control and leave a generation of smart people with nothing to loose but their chains

There's nothing illegal about spreading propaganda that is designed to encourage mentally ill people to kill others. Freedom of speech bitch.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio
Um no sweetie

Attached: (you).png (235x215, 6.13K)

I agree though kill the rich, but be the change you want in the world, I can't afford a gun but your probably can, go, do it.

So how the fuck does the right get away with it all the time? There's obviously an arbitrary line drawn when it comes to "incitement", so my post is asking where is that line and how close can we get to it without crossing it?

If this post seems sketch then fine, just avoid it. But honestly, it just seems like the right is able to spread massive propaganda that leads to bigotry which in turn leads to violence. My question is how do we flip this?

Btw thanks for the link, very useful. I think this could actually be used to get sites like Kiwifarms shut down if someone had a good enough lawyer.

Drumpf
Aka they're porky's pet.
That's why.

They were getting away with it before Trump tho. The anti-SJW bullshit was strongest before the 2016 election. There has to be a formula

Anti sjw shit wasn't as much violence as it was mocking.

We need to be willing to die/face serious legal trouble. Cops need to die with higher frequency, and big names need to be at least be attempted to be assassinated. Senators, mayor's, idc at this point.

We need guns, and we need to learn basic bomb construction.

I don't know FBI

Because they never decried violence like liberals did. You have a group of people not afraid to incite violence and feign regret if it goes a little to far, and another group of people that try to remain passive at all costs as a core part of their ideology. It's just a slightly different version of the "you're intolerant if you don't tolerate my intolerance" shtick.

Why? Where did you learn about this meme?
Rich=/=Bourgeois. Stop listening to anarco liberals

agitation through graffiti

Attached: 24TH_LENIN2.jpg (810x491, 62.22K)

Tar and feather them, and sabotage there profits.
I’m not even joking.
The best form of violence is if it’s funny and humiliates the subject while simultaneously diffusing any tension around the act with laughter. That’s what was done during the American revolution.

Meaningless violence is not just uselss but counterprodutive, read Lenin.
marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1902/sep/01.htm
The Narodniks and SRs engaged in terrorism for some 30-40 years before 1905, look what the fuck it achieved. You want to do something productive? Educate, Agitate, Organise. Actually build a mass of people rather than some small cell taking pot-shots, get the message out, get them fighting for it in their own ways. Just blowing up shit achives fuckall.

Lenin was a counter-revolutionary who betrayed the revolution and created an authoritarian dictatorship in Russia.

Now that that's out of my system, you make a good point, our best course of action right now is to get people educated about what socialism is and means.

That image…

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (900x900, 948.61K)