Alt-right obsession with masculinity

Anyone noticed that the alt-right is absolutely obsessed with adhering to masculinity and masculine gender roles and calling out leftists and "conservatives" for being effeminate. Yet they themselves are some of the biggest pussies on the planet right up there with reddit nu male SJWs?

They promote this idea of "right-wing Chads", r/chadright (alt-right forum for "Chads"), "Chads are right-wing." Yet the vast majority of Chads are apolitical. And if they have any political leanings whatsoever, they tend to lean mainstream liberal more than mainstream conservative. And every time you see a Republican Chad, he is a mainstream conservative. Like a good ol country boy Chad wearing flannel, hunting, drinking beer and double-teaming thots with his runningback team mate Tyrone. Chad is not phased by "niggers" who fuck "his women" like alt-right "Chads" are. Because Chad has no shortage of sluts of all races on his cawk.

Chad is chill, charismatic, sociable, has high social intelligence. He might be a bully and pick on low-status males. But he's not going around bitching about niggers fucking his women and spics taking his job and refugees using up all the welfare.

SJW men are the furthest thing from masculinity. The "soyboy" meme is kinda true (soy doesn't feminize men but there are prototypical effeminate liberal men out there). You know the reddit cuckolds with beards, wear those glasses, hold SJW political opinions and have effeminate frames, etc. Chad is not a SJW. But Chad is definitely not alt-right either.

Attached: 3da.jpeg (4152x2248, 1.67M)

In other news ladies and gentlemen the sky is blue.
Wow.

Attached: i love whores and horses i do.jpg (1600x1200, 60.15K)

Because most of them have identity issues because they spent their childhoods locked inside some suburban hellscape where their only social interaction was through preapproved playdates which mommy had to drive them to. They grew up in a prison and now worship it, wanting to make society at large into a prison as well. The same applies to "soyboy" liberals, except they hold a different view of what the prison should be. Therefore they are Zig Forums's greatest enemy.

Meanwhile, the part of society that was allowed to walk home alone after school does things like get jobs or have relationships, things human beings normally have.

STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST
STOP BEING LOOKIST

Rightists are extremely insecure
Youtuber 'No Bulshit' calls people "beta males" and "cucks" unironicly and looks lile this.

Attached: maxresdefault (15).jpg (1280x720, 95.85K)

It's not really about lookism. However men who are attractive tend to have positive feedback loops all their life and tend to grow up to be socially adjusted adults.


I use the word "beta" and "cuck" as well. However I myself readily admit that I'm an "omega male". Which is even worse than a beta male. lol. I'm a man of low-status. However I have basically accepted my place in the sexual marketplace. I have already given up. I've had my dancing monkey stage where I was this beta male trying to change who I was in order to obtain female approval. I look down on beta males who are subservient to women. I reached a point 3 years ago where I thought, "If I can't be Chad, I might as well rot in my basement." I don't pretend to put on a masculine persona like many men do on the right.

Like look at that fat piece of shit Matt Forney. Who thinks that he is some alpha male because he "slays" pussy in the Philippines. He is a glorified john. The Filipinas undoubtedly find him disgusting. But they see western suckers like him as their golden ticket out of poverty.

I have come to peace with my genetic subhuman status. Especially when I am autistic and won't be happy with being anything less than a Chad. I have figured out that I am not genuinely interested in people, including women, they are just all NPCs in my life. So I can't hold down relationships. This is probably due to my autism. Or maybe its autism co-morbid with anti-social personality disorder. And I don't have the SMV to slay like Chad either. If you're not a hot sexy stud, you're not going to acquire casual sex very easily. And when I do, I psyche myself out thinking "I can't dick her down the way Chad/Tyrone can", etc.

I have a better understanding of my neurosis than the typical alt-righter does. The alt-right is still in that denial stage. I'm like in that acceptance stage.

Reading this post has made me realize just how much of internet discourse is shaped by sexual pathology, insecurity, repeated imaginings of physical penetration, etc.
Like intellectually I knew this. Of course this whole cuck and soyboy thing has its genesis in sex-starved internet weirdos. But this is the first time it's been made visceral. What a fucking waste of time.

Attached: 225d585f05835e30178411d1e7be85233edfca3ea6559f821db60e63f3e0a895.jpg (640x853, 62.64K)

Yes it is.
You can be masculine and ugly. What is the common theme wrong with the men in the top right, other than that they don't have chiseled jawlines, hunter eyes and look young?
I get it if you're a female, because females are fucking idiots, but as a male you should be above this.

Rightists can't get over the fact they are wrong.

Attached: 1521357820733.jpg (944x960, 90.7K)

So people think you're an ugly loser. It's because you are. What are you going to do about it big boy, cry?

Attached: 2c096521066bdd6d09401f65ec5cbb46b6da7d9ce75a86203d6cb0bd39c5c407.jpg (450x450, 46.86K)

except none on the right are masculine either

Aren't you a bit biased on who is and isn't an idiot, considering you're an autistic freak yourself?

LOL at all these "vitality", "male enhancement" supplements on Info Wars. Jesus Christ.

I am legit low-T. I had testosterone levels similar to a 90 year old man. I had an actual prescription for testosterone. I had erections. But after I got into a relationship and we had sex a couple times, the erection problems were largely resolved. I wasn't able to "go" on demand (women are able to "go" at any time so as long as they are wet and aren't in pain). But my sexual confidence and libido was much improved. Without having to use testosterone supplements.

Being autistic, experiencing peer rejection all my life and my subsequent social isolation after high school, I was very awkward around women and my body wouldn't respond naturally to them. The usual way that I would interact sexually with women would be through watching porn and jacking off.

People say that you should do NoFap. But NoFap doesn't work. It is pseudo-science bullshit. Obviously you shouldn't be jacking off before you see your girlfriend because the refractory period might kick in and the second orgasm is less intense than the first. And with the third and fourth orgasm for me, there's like small drops of cum. There's not much left in the tank.

Other than the refractory period stuff, it's all psychological. Unless you really do have a medical condition.

man go post on /cow/ or something, this isn't your personal blog

/cow/, a board full of basement dwelling losers laughing at other basement dwelling losers. sounds legit. lmao. While actual socially adjusted people are out there slaying pussy, kiwifarmers are writing thousands of posts on chris-chan. lmao

...

I meant to say uninteresting
Fucking autocorrect.

What's that effect again in which those who benefit the least in something in society or are effected the most by it are the first or the most vocal on the thing?

I think it came from the fact that after ejaculation, your testosterone levels plummet for a short time, but typical Zig Forumstards only read as far as confirming their beliefs, and never bothered to learn that it recovers to normal levels within an hour or two. So yeah, jacking off and then immediately trying to dead lift 1RM but unless you're jerking off 8 times a day there's no way it could ever drain them of testosterone like they claim.

Attached: lets masturbate.png (1030x690, 484.33K)

Isn't masterbaiting pretty good for you?

Liberals and lots of lefties tend to dislike or outright hate masculinity, so the aut right appeals to people who value masculinity. It's a strategic move in addition to a reactionary angle of "reclaim lost glory" nonsense. Being anti-male to any significant degree is playing into the dynamic.

Attached: 1433482493635.png (306x245, 13.89K)

Not true about the tendency, but understandable why the perception is there.

Rightests tend to control the narratives much better than leftists do. It helps they collude with dark money conservative lobbyists who financially commercialize New Right narratives.

Leftists have the intelligentsia and Hollywood (for now)
but
Rightests have Koch funded and Moral Majority/Tea Party constructed activist networks plus they canvass all day and night

It's becoming clear the rightest approach is more effective at shaping macro thoughtforms among the more consistent voter base.

It's a reaction to liberal obsession with masculinity. This "alt-right" didn't come overnight, it's a massive backlash to modern liberalism, this isn't rocket science.

Attached: 4669eb1d5b8a2826606e53e884a4da318d8d352fb1f68be33395d933141f7780.png (317x420, 194.76K)

Sometimes Freud has better explanations of sociological phenomena than Marx.

Why not combine the two? Freudo-Marxist Gang

Isn’t that just a twink?

twinks actually get laid though

He looks normal


Stop being rascist

As in low T levels and looking feminine and shit.

Who the fuck is that?

wait, nevermind. I misread that.

femboys do get laid though, if there aren't guys willing to fuck you there's fujos and dominas

Ahem

Attached: zizek.jpg (175x287, 8.46K)

I’ve never once heard Zizek mention Freud. Although I don’t know to what extent Lacan was a Freudian.

A very large extent.

masculinity is a spook

Attached: astolfo2.png (710x813, 751.23K)

So is femininity

The left fetishizes being sissies and getting men to cut to their cocks off, we are simply the counterbalance to this dialectic, I don't see what the big deal is.

His entire ideology is mainly Freudian- Lacanian. Watch the Pervert's Guide movies.

That's an anime.

This really

you realize any left wing ideology wont fix this right?
no matter what welfare program, you will always be seen as inferior, and lazy

spinosauruskin is this you?

Whats your point?

The suggestion that it's a strategic move that wouldn't haven been taken were it not for the left's rejection of masculinity is wrong.

Reactionary ideology across the globe is built on the upholding of hierarchies. This includes sexual hierarchies that place men above women. The empowerment of women and the discarding of traditional masculinity subverts that hierarchy, and so the right will fight to maintain or reestablish that hierarchy. From Portugal, Spain and Nazi Germany to Japan to modern-day salafists, independent women are a threat to civilization and the solution is usually to push them back into their traditional roles of child-rearing and homemaking.

I really don't know where you get the idea of "Chads" not being reactionary from. Traditionally, they have always been of a conservative and reactionary variety, especially in this climate of hypertrophied political interest among common people, I've seen the chauvinist "Chads" browsing /r/The_Donald (Not Alt-Righters, just milquetoast republicans).
Masculinity is in itself a universal truth, an attribute which MUST be shared by both sexes, no matter what alt-righters say.
The truth is that if a “soyboy” were bullied, they would be walked all over, if someone wanted to fight them, they would be absolutely brutalized. Their response is of liberal pacifism, they know they are too weak to win in a fight, so they don't fight, instead they seek other methods of retaliation (practically wielding their impotent slave morality as a weapon and expecting to win because of it)
However, such as all broad political regions and conceptions, it results in a person fanatically clinging to profound truths, their attachment to these truths comes from visceral inward thoughts and feelings molded by material conditions. This can lead to a person absolutely obsessing over it so much that it becomes telling of who they are and how they feel on the inside, and it is easy to see that the alt-right feels increasingly emasculated by liberal media and encouraged to sit down, not take up any space, and not try to achieve anything in their entire life in order for systematically oppressed peoples (in a collective sense, not oppression of an indivual) to stand up, take up as much space as possible and are encouraged to go forth and be dogged cavaliers in gaining what they want.
This archetype of a young man is the perfect prey for the alt-right, they exploit their misery and indignity at the liberal capitalist world by redirecting that indignity and anger elsewhere, where it doesn't need to be, blaming it on the Jews and the blacks instead of blaming it on who is truly responsible:
Capitalism. That which inevitably gives way to the exact sort of chauvinism (schoolyard bullies, hierarchical anti-egalitarianism in school systems) that battered and berated them into this extreme obsession with masculinity and self defense in the first place.
True egalitarianism is NOT merely protecting those too weak to defend themselves. No, that is only the mask of the reactionary used to uphold a hierarchical system based on an innate superiority of stronger peoples. In such a relationship between the reactionary “protector” and the “victim”, it is key to understand that the reactionary is attracted to such a virtue because it emphasizes the victim, the inferior, and the protector, the superior.
Nor is true egalitarianism pacifism, a conception of which lends itself from liberalism and individualism. If a victim is physically weak, the victim MUST attain equality by brutalizing the chauvinist and pummeling them into submission. That is how they become equal, that is how they become empowered. Two people CANNOT be equal if one is physically weaker than the other, to simply state they are without any reason is evidence of liberal thought.
Thus it is the DUTY of a stronger person to not only protect the weak and defenseless BUT to help the weak and defenseless to become the greatest beings they can possibly be through regimentation and encouragement.
Advocates of the liberal, individualist conception of egalitarianism want to force superior people to accept the weakness of others, to accept their illness and to tolerate it. That will not do, the only way to bring equality is to MAKE them equal, not to simply insist they are equal and always have been even in all their weak, pitiful being. The weak must not be babysat.
This conception of egalitarianism seems, to me, inherently maternal, feminine. After all, what is the traditional conception of motherhood without the notion of someone depending on you for absolutely every possible thing (Oh, you poor, poor, (pitiful, pathetic) thing, I'll take care of you, because you're simply too weak to do anything on your own) ? The nature of femininity is itself not safe from the corruption of anti-egalitarianism.
Collective egalitarianism means the ascension of all the people to the greatest status of being that they can possibly reach, this MUST be done by exhortation and regimentation by a higher personality, the spiritual entity of the state.

Attached: 3827b264a9ee28ae9ce8a4e4f113ef33d91472135b1673546c189502986f4a6.png (560x560, 246.47K)

HA HA WHAT A BUNCH OF FAGGOTS

inb4 some faux intellectual tries to dissect my inner failings in order to make himself feel better