Serious E-Celeb thread

With the premise that I hate most E celebs, hate youtube, hate twitter ecc. And that I know why there is such small presece from communist online, why the fuck the vanguard of the left online is rappresented by this trio? The worst possible people one could have as rappresentatives?
Left is a broad term, but what are actual communist doing to end the tyranny of these trio?
It's not fucking difficult to bury faggots channels like Nobullishit, sargon, infowars, steven crowder or whatever fucking faggot who discusses pop-political matters.
Obviously guys like HDsoybomber, puke or fagpoints are not willing to go against these guys because the would have to admit that, even for wrong reasons, they got a point on things and this for them them would mean losing liberal brownie points and patreon bucks.
Why no one got the balls to go directly against right wing types online? And why do we let this trio go around saying that they rappresent us? Seriously, I'm not saying that it will change the world or anything but having a bit of a normie, smart and clever who doesn't give a fuck about liberals and money would at least change the mind of a few people who think that left equals soy boys, trannies and twinks.

Who we got? Mexie who is scared of raising her voice and dropping liberalism, Unrhue who is a good propagandist but is dependent on youtube bucks so can't risk to offend the twitter left more and finbol who is the best but too much of an autist an too focused on the USSR, demsoc01 is good but 0 charisma
Ah yeah an zero books, who again is in for the money and pseud central.

libertariancuckrants is basically dead so I don't care other wise I would have made a gang of four joke

What I'm saying here is that we need someone charismatic who is also a good propagandists and doesn't give a shit, this is literally the only thing that matter. Theory is not required imho (I mean a bit it is) but we need more presence when it comes to propaganda.

Attached: images (9).jpeg (847x478 9.75 KB, 55.83K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=GWwiUIVpmNY
youtube.com/watch?v=8NFy6Uc2BHs
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

It's gonna take more than that. We need not just someone, but a whole group of people who excel in production quality, networking, theory, charisma etc.
Maybe form teams? Maybe even form a persona made up of multiple anons while pretending to be one?

I've noticed the same thing OP. Most well-known leftists on youtube either pander to liberals for patreon bucks (Hbomberguy, Shaun, and Contra) or they just start e-drama with other rational-skeptics so that they can get views from butthurt fanboys of said skeptics I'm looking at you Tru-Dank I've starting up my youtube again and have been trying to produce non-cringe propaganda with talking points from a far-left perspective. It's too bad people on youtube don't give a shit about that and the youtube algorithm probably buries far-left material under the wave of liberal and reactionary bullshit
On a another related note I really hated how Contra shilled for her patreon in the middle of a video explaining the history of racism in America and how black people get systematically fucked over
youtube.com/watch?v=GWwiUIVpmNY
Go to the 4:05 mark to see what I'm talking about, it's fucking shameless. Plus she has merch that you can buy goddamn how can you even call these people "leftist?" They are merely capitalist entertainers who found a new market to sell products to life-stylists

Attached: Untitled.png (1049x539, 801.42K)

sargon rants into a microphone for half an hour over whatever he found in one of the internets toilets.
he just has a good microphone, doesnt stutter or 'uhh umm' constantly, and articulates his speech.

patreon and internet channel merch isnt really like small business ownership or actually being booj, they live under capitalism and gotta make money somehow
I dont have any interest in contrapoints but thats a weak criticism.

They aren't petty booj since they are basically working for youtube I just find the whole selling merch thing to be disingenuous but hey you're right gotta make money somehow.

I thought of that too. But we will reconcile different ideologies? Take for example ML and Anarchist, how can they have s discussion with someone else without killing each other? If there is a good team with chemistry and are friends with each other secretarianism could even be our gimmick

I mean they make money from patreon, merch and ads. How much is enough? Plus they are discussing politics. How can they be not biased when they are always one step away from losing ad bucks or patreon donators?

We already have Varg for the Nazbol gang, I guess all you FAKE communists will just keep floundering…

We got one.

Attached: 55d2777a90398cf4feba975e34eaf3d062d9d6033e170f75469cef68167a32d2.jpg (712x400, 28.32K)

People like Contra and Shaun aren't for you, they're there to make centrists and liberals more open to positions from the radical left as they grow politically.

Attached: IMG_1448-1.PNG (1280x1005, 1.63M)

i am ashamed to admit that contrapoints makes my willy feel funny

How can they do that if they are not radical left themself ?

the light he uses in the videos would make roo look hot

Shaun is pretty awesome IMO.

For the love of god SAGE AND MOVE ON.

leftist youtube rankings:
1. Cockshott
2. zerobooks
3. probably finnbol or demsoc but I havnt watched them so trudank I guess.
4. everyone else
ℵ₀. Centrist liberals

Even non ML's should checkout Finbol

Hey woah fuck you pal

Worst leftist e-celebs:

Best leftist e-celebs:

PRAISE bE TO COCKSHOTT AND THE LOW-LEVEL STATIC

Batko makes decent thread sims and isn't the worst, Badmouse is a theory-let but still good for propoganda. Roo is good for propoganda but he's still a giant sperg and not really the best.

Roo, go to bed.

I see two people there.

And here's the solution: produce quality content.

Most far-left YouTube is basically just a largely unedited opinionstube rant video with static pictures. Contrapoints and Hbomberguy are popular because their videos have direction and quality editing.

So, if you want to take down these guys, or even the other parts of YouTube, you need to plan out how your video is going to go down before making it, don't just slap it together. Do multiple takes for your lines so that it all flows well and doesn't sound like a rant. Try to use video in the background instead of static images, have some background music going, break the video up into distinct segments so it comes off less as a unplanned stream of consciousness.

I, for one, actually don't mind the sort of ranty videos a lot of lefttubers put out, but I recognize that they're pretty niche. If you want quasi-mainstream YouTube popularity, you need to do more.

Attached: z.gif (350x263, 44.03K)

I'm probably going to make some serious vids (i.e Venezuela, DPRK, etc) I just need to find a pleasing aesthetic

Personal favorite leftist e-celebs:
Leftist e-celebs whom I hate:
>Chaya/FatimahI'm actually a huge occultfag but I can't forgive them for cursing Unruhe

Attached: 11393307_1451879205107543_6476709251920818680_o.jpg (1396x637, 121.61K)

Hoxha poster and/or the tank poster who made the DPRK general (I've seen you comment on Cockshott's videos btw) should get good mics and team up with someone who's good at video editing.

You do realise the general zerobooks philosophy is anti-ML, right? Muke fits in with them way more.

Zero Books isn't an ML because he's disenchanted, Muke's literally just retarded. There's a difference.
It's similar to how Batko isn't insufferable while Anarchopac and ranting autismo acne fucker are.


Related note: the only cure for the disillusionment of the first world prole is Landian fetishism of the end of the modern, someone please poz Zero Books on Land

No they're fucking not, they're there to disarm the left and prevent revolution. They are fucking safety valves.

If you followed twitter ☭TANKIE☭s then you'd know that zero books have already acclimated themselves with lands work, the guy who wrote capitalist realism was also a big fan of land supposedly.

That doug is just another petty-booj leftcom.

Most of us don't hate Muke because he's not an ML or whatever, most of us just hate him cause he's irritating as fuck. I don't see whats wrong with following different perspectives either

If you're going to call them homophobic slurs then I prefer them to whoever you're thinking should represent communism online

Attached: misa face.png (164x185, 9.93K)

I've been IP banned twice and I don't honestly care to actively google people's profiles on that god forsaken site.


This. I'm an ML and people like Batko, Doug from Zero Books, Zizek, etc don't bother me for not thinking like I do. Muke is insufferable because he's smug as fuck while being a borderline retarded drug addicted aidsy looking attention whore.


Hey there buddy, I'm a man who's sucked more than a few penises in his lifetime, you have permission to call Muke a faggot.

stopped reading

This is the only e-celeb that should ever matter on this board

Attached: nasim.jpg (400x602, 27.87K)

ok

don't see much wrong with this . S&J does a good job of this imo by out-skepticing them, and I think le rational skeptic teens are a perfectly fine group of people to target online, and I see nothing wrong with exploiting youtube algos to push a remotely left (or at least anti-sargonism) message. (I don't know how effective he actually is though).

I think we need more charismatic genuine socialists to do similar inane shit as the socdems are gaining popularity from as an entry point; flashy debunking videos, debates, so on. Muke would be this person if he hadn't become a leftcom who has began alienating himself from everyone by being such a psuedo, but maybe he'll grow out of it. FinBol, demsoc etc are generally pretty good but have content isn't really consumer friendly for anybody not already on the left, which of course is good and absolutely has a place. I just think we really lack a consciously accessible and appealing, but also theoretically sound, handsome/female communist to bait liberals over to our side with

Pierre is alright, demsoc is like the potholer of the left, uhhhhhhh, I guess danov is cool too?

People are seriously sleeping on Comrade Hakim. I guess Left Review is nice too, though I can't pin-down his ideology That's probably a good thing tbh. In my opinion we are in need of leftist youtubers who fit the criteria of disciplined, non-snarky, and forthright, but are still digestible.

Even this isn't a necessity, most liberal "skeptics" and alt-right types don't show themselves at all until they have to make a public appearance. Actual leftists should be extremely wary about showing themselves or giving any information relating to their identity anyway.

Anyone who e-begs isn't worth it. Contra, Roo, Muke, and everyone else pimping their puh-TRAY-on account to ask for gibs is trash.

Explain to me exactly why you think this needs any attention.

Attached: sargon_of_thatcher.png (632x879, 879.6K)

I never want to hear about this guy again. Peoples fixation with him has only ever made his audience cling to him more

His audience and reach is big and those of his ilk have been having large reaches for a long time among edgy internet teens relatively uncontested. Sure it has no significance outside of the internet but the man's influence on online discourse is very visible imo.

youtube.com/watch?v=8NFy6Uc2BHs is a good video on the psychology and tactics regarding le rational skeptics and why providing a vocal alternative to them is at least not a complete waste of time it by Shaun himself.


he had loyal fans before people started contesting him. I'm bored of him and his clones too though. He's mostly just a dull manchild who hopped on to the right issues at the right time to make a buck.

What do you guys think about Peter Coffin?

He seems to be kinda in the same vein as Zero Books ideologically.

I'm not interested in watching a Shaun video. I know which community you appear to be a part of. Go away.

faggot

Peter Coffin is a guy that will do and say wathever he thinks will being him the most fame or sympathy, i would not take him seriously.

I heard he was kind of a lolcow

Go away Peter

Attached: Petespirecy5.jpg (444x592, 198.46K)

You mean that somewhat sarcastic, blinking become a patron thing? Seems more like her taking a shot at herself than anything else.

Attached: 47 - wKibqOP.jpg (720x401, 23.86K)

Patreon is the contemporary equivalent of playing guitar on the street and collecting money in a hat.

Because he expresses the default ideological attitude? I am russian and I can see his videos fucking translated and peddled as a deep stuff by typical imageboard inbreds as a proof for already established (here) narrative about cultural marxists/PC/tolerance are destroying the West paid by 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧soros🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 bucks. That's a point of connection between parts of "nationalist international" reactionary bs.

Last I heard of him he was apparently faking being married by posing a sex doll for pictures.

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (612x612, 548.43K)

Roo is already hot.

Attached: 13612330_1299579170069980_6468461705650930258_n.png (487x316, 138.24K)

Attached: 3478.png (500x487, 468.21K)

haven't seen this one before actually

Attached: 48690.png (189x292, 119.76K)

The same reason why "rational skeptics" and (center-right) "moderates" are the representatives of the right on youtube; the average American is politically sterile. Shaun and Harry are alright at btfo'ing retards like Molyneux and Sargon, but that's about it. Contra is mildly entertaining but HIS videos lack substance.

As for actual leftist youtubers, we should focus on what attracts new people the most and what opens them for experience. I got into this because of Stirner, it was Rebel's and Pierre's videos on him that got me interested in their channels and eventually the rest of Zig Forums and its creators. What people like to watch is people tearing others a new one, Rebel's video on Crowder was good, Pierre's videos on Sargon & co. etc were (tho albeit a bit lacking) overall good, Badmouse's response videos were good.

Besides response videos, the videos that get the most attention are ones with a controversial topic that is recognizable in the title. Just taking a quick look at Mexie's channel you can immediately see that her most viewed videos are with a clear title concerning a frequently argued topic whether among lolberts or leftists, or some type of video that is popular i.e. her personal ideology video. Who the fuck do you think is going to watch a video titled "Colonial-Capitalist Exploitation: Indigenous Peoples in Canada [Collab w/ Vegan Sista + Mad Blender]"? Who the fuck cares about this shit besides a niche of people? On the other hand, Badmouse's video titles and thumbnails are attractive, catchy, aesthetic, and it's only because of that his videos had more exposure in the few years he's been here than Roo who has more subscribers and time on his channel, yet so little exposure and relevancy.

I'm not suggesting you (content creators) should sell-out and start making clickbait, I'm saying you should make relevant videos with some aesthetic production value. And fucking practice your voice and lines, make it PLEASANT to listen to you, seriously.

Attached: rip.jpg (225x225, 8.2K)

FINBOL
I
N
B
O
L

is the answer to every e-celeb question.

While the realdoll thing is a contentious issue, what's been proven is that he faked having a hot albeit racist Asian girlfriend which was found out by actual Asian girls because they recognized her as not being one of their own.

Remember that Muke surrounds himself with milked liberal lolcows like Coffin, hbomberguy and Contra, who is on her way of getting there with her "dating preferences" bullshit whereas every actual socialist is blocked by him. Apparently "getting Marx" also includes surrounding yourself with SocDems and blocking and hating every other socialist. Left YouTube is almost completely shit, we have liberal careerists (Muke), weirdos (Jason), trannies and troons (Contra), lolcows (hbomberguy, Peter Coffin), etc. - I didn't mean to be transphobic here but the problem with trans people is that they tend to focus waaaaaay to much on their own, marginal struggle and talk about issues relating to 0,1% of the working class.

The only good YouTubers are Mexie, FinnBol (although he surrounds himself with retards and needs to cut ties with them and surround himself with intelligent people), BadMouse (who has read zero theory but simply makes good videos accessible for normies) and Pierre (although his older videos suck). The biggest potential out of all of them has Mexie, but the problem is she's not confrontational enough. She needs to do take-downs of rightist YouTubers, deliver more "takes" and the such, but that will never happen, will it?

Mexie is good. I suspect that most of the negative comments she got here come from the 30 % of our userbase who are thirsty traps who get super-salty about any mildly positive comment a woman gets.

Confused liberal currently throwing some radical buzzwords around. Who knows what positions he will espouse in a year. The height of his career was when he was on TV demonstrating that he could kick himself in the nuts. (I'm not making this up.)

Sexism certainly plays a role. Mexie has never said anything controversial or an outrageous SJW tier thing. She's even said that she rejects bourgeois feminism. 90% of her detractors think she's a liberal because she's a woman who has her life in order. That people talk shit about Mexie because she isn't some mentally ill incel autist tells you a lot about the modern left.

I've heard people criticizing her for putting on make-up and a nice top for her videos. How fucking retarded you have to be to say shit like that?

Pure spectacle.
Pure activism.

Attached: 04a5df288bb29ed7de875991a7567bd07cc6ffc3cc4301fb6912758ccc4229ab.png (800x192, 85.18K)

I know you are baiting but I didn't even said that

What he said. For all the talk of the need to appeal to broad masses via the pleb medium of youtube, it has all so far amounted to nothing. Even the most famous politically tinged youtube persona, Carlgon, has seen his attempt to translate into a real world political movement (libralistism) come to a laughable nothing.

screencap this post, sargons channel will be dead under 2 years

Attached: index.jpg (301x167, 4.04K)

that dudes channel got nuked, has he got a backup?
I rmemeber him mocking the skeptics real good

...

[Spoiler] He became a fascist fuckboy and nuked his channel himself

Bullshit, one well-clicked YouTube video does more in the year of 2018 than a hundred Trots with newspapers on a campus. Wake up, grandpa


Veganism is SJW stuff now? Guess I missed that communique.

There's nothing inherently wrong with veganism/vegetarianism. It's better for the environment and can be perfectly healthy if done correctly.

I don't care if you're a vegan but this moral arguement that animals are allies because they are exploited under capitalism is absurd. Animals will be exploited under communism as well. Who cares? They're animals.

Does purposefully misgendering trans people make pathetic men feel less pathetic? Or is it just an edgy thing?

Finnbol isn’t alright, but fuck mexie

*is alright

There are people out there who build their identity around that sort of faux irreverence and believe saying "nigger" is an iconoclastic gesture.

What's wrong with mexie?

Explain to me what's horrible about Mexie that doesn't revolve arround the talking points of "SHE'S A GIRL" or "HURR SHE'S A VEGAN".

>>>Zig Forums

I agree that that specific argument is kinda stupid, but there absolutely are good moral arguments in favour of not eating animals.

...

She got butt mad one time because someone told her they don’t like idpol and made a video about it.

The only thing i have against Hbomb is the fact that he tries to hides the ~8000$ he's making on Patreon

I kind of does require an effort. I don't live in america and never encountered a person who required who asked me to refer to them in a specific proun.
If "it" was passable and didn't know the fact that he is a man, I would probably call him "her". But even discussing about is a waste of fucking time seen how these people exist only on the internet

The amount of contradiction in your post is sad.

Attached: Kord_Syria11.jpg (598x324, 38.3K)

Go take you estrogen pills fucking faggot

How will I ever recover

All me!

How the fuck is hbomberguy funny? I can never laugh at these e-celebs, same with Contrapoints, it all comes over as forced and a desperate attempt at being a comedian. Maybe it's just that they all suck at acting, but I think it's cringey. The same way I find it cringey as hell to do a "soystream" or to pump your body full with soy milk for two weeks just to "trigger right-wingers epic style xDD"

I think if your response at the accusation from the right that the left is a bunch of degenerate, effeminate faggots is to be an even more degenerate, effeminate faggot you are not better than those Lolberts that went protesting in diapers

This guy knows what's up

Holy, the "you're communist but you have a phone" argument said by a supposed communist.

What has the world come to.

Retard. It's not a problem because they are lefty, it's a problem because they have to make what they say mass marketable as possible so biased and Politcally correct

What, are you telling me most people would not want to watch a fat neckbeard with a shitty mohawk talking very slowly about how the victims of a school shooting were guilty of not being psychologists?

Attached: stop liking what I don't like.gif (500x281, 614.9K)

Dude, hbomberguy gets 8k per video.

There is difference between using a gadget that everyone uses and which is part of the average living standard and getting rich through very little work.

More like stop associating with these people if you call yourself radical and not a liberal

Attached: currently_existing_communism.jpeg (2400x2400, 265.58K)

Drinking soy and being an SJW who calls socialism to violent is not really what I intend as positive propaganda

People like hbomberguy or Contrapoints are very unsympathetic to the average person. Especially because of their tendency to require you to subscribe to their personal extremist views or otherwise you're "problematic". Contra even goes on to say how man and lesbians who don't want to date transwomen "haven't really thought about it". Like, are you kidding me? Most men will never find transwomen attractive no matter how much estrogen they take, it's their jawline, their hips, the way they walk, etc.

I'm sorry but here is the unpopular truth bomb: Sargon is more pleasant to listen to and to hang out with for the large majority of the population.

So, yeah, Contrapoints, hbomberguy, Muke, etc. are hurtful for the radical left in the long term.