Mass killings

Except they didn't. That's an idea that appeared in the 17th century, but there isn't really any indication that barter was, in fact, the dominant mode of exchange of proto-historic communities.

Are you actually retarded? What about romans using currency? What about the dark ages? Trading has always been a part of human nature.

for most of their history humans have lived in primitive communism, read engels

...

If you want a serious answer, greed is a sickness of the mind exacerbated under capitalism due to everyone being enslaved to the continuous accumulation of capital, and if x number of porkies don't want to give up their mansions so that the poor and sick can die in the cold, then there's only one cure for that number of porkies

about .5 %, on a global scale

Zig Forums is full of posts made by morons with a little bit of knowlege. Good thing even as un-egalitarian capitalism is IRL, you are getting shit on by it. Capital is not just money, the coin has no value nust because someone worked on it (mudpie argument of a different color) and capitalism is not just trade. You dumb fuck, the only history you know comes from your high school textbook.

Don't forget sociopaths. They do it for the funzies

how many are sociopaths though. And in a system that rewards sociopathic tendencies (lying, emotional distance, manipulation) those with sociopathic tendencies have their behaviour magnified and end up able to do harm to others


gift economies and primitive communism is not the same as a system where capital is king and everyone must try to profit or starve to death

No.

Attached: 9cc5f927bf4bb8d8e7442b22000fcbc4e6deacb1598725762a14f0451534858f.jpg (274x184, 4.76K)