Just more proof house ownership is EXTREMELY reactionary and that we ought to work together with the neoliberal austerity fucktards to remove any and all state support for home purchases.
In fighting homeless camp, Irvine's Asians win, but at a cost
Wrong board, >>>/liberty/ is that way.
Why are you surprised that a bunch of rootless cosmopolitans have no sympathy for homeless people? The homeless people are likely all either black or white, while the homeowners in Irvine are Asians and Middle Easterners. The idiots who pushed the POC narrative are cancer. There is no connection between Blacks and Asians. Whites and Blacks should be the ones working together.
House ownership propagates a petite bourgeoisie mindset among the proles. There's a reason why so many liberal capitalist governments go out of their way to subsidize it.
I'm beginning to feel this sentiment more and more. Although, working class Asians I think we can win over too.
Homeless asians are still homeless, user, and black and white porkies should still be housed in the gulag.
There isn't much of one. They all just buy up property and businesses to generate passive income. Don't think about class solidarity, they're more interested in helping their own.
This is kind of important to remember. It's true, there are working-class asians and many of them would probably not mind at the very least forming unions or w/e, but most of them are spooked as hard or harder than everybody else since Asian cultures have historically been very order-oriented.
Every time you see a liberal idpoler in here talking about “immigrants are the GREATEST comrades”, just remember this shit. Screen cap it for prosperity, and remember that economic immigrants are some of the biggest fucking class cucks alive. These people also know full well they can get liberals to capitulated to their demands if the dress it up as a cultural thing.