Syria "Gas Attack"

DOZENS KILLED IN SYRIA GAS ATTACK
Get ready for the world-police to jump into action, comrades. Will there actually be proof this time?

reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-attack/dozens-reported-killed-in-suspected-syria-gas-attack-damascus-denies-idUSKBN1HE0RR
rt.com/news/423499-us-blames-russia-douma-chemical/

Attached: IMG_1328.JPG (690x388, 40.16K)

Other urls found in this thread:

opcw.org/news/article/destruction-of-syrian-chemical-weapons-completed/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Shayrat_missile_strike
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Had my shitposting flag on in the first post, whoops. Pundits on the TV in my house are already asking if a military response is justified.

Attached: IMG_1329.PNG (1221x1316, 307.02K)

you mean tens of thousands of poor innocent children
but yes this got picked up instantly by media and spun pretty quickly, US attack is almost certain.

Either cruise missile strikes on SAA assets or all the buildup in Jordan is going to be used to connect Al Tanf with K*rdish territory and cut the Iraq/Syria border

Attached: gassing device.jpg (2600x2000, 705.79K)

lol

Attached: 1386283074888.png (534x381, 335.43K)

Why does Zig Forums always assume gas attacks in Syria to be lies by default? Naturally those are perfect excuses for imperialist forces to engage in "humanitarian" intervention, but surely coherent socialists would be capable of understanding that a despotic neoliberal state would not shy away from war crimes?

Because that's been the case everytime so far?

Because most people here believe that if you dont support muh Lion of Damascus and BAZED Russia and Iran 100% then Your a NATO Shill and no Nuance

But in the case of "Muh gas attacks" its Justified because literally almost all of them have been false flags

He knows.

Attached: assad-lion.jpg (318x320, 18.45K)

For one thing, proof is never offered and they have turned out to be fake several times. I don't disbelieve it, but I'm suspicious. It's like with the Skripal incident. Did Russia do it? Maybe. Where's the proof? We all know that this will be used, whether Syria is behind it or not, as a potential pretext for increasing American / Western presence in Syria. Those 2000 US troops won't be leaving any time soon and I still believe that it will be considered a war with in five years for the US.

See also:
opcw.org/news/article/destruction-of-syrian-chemical-weapons-completed/

So is this legit or just lies to justify military intervention? Some people in this thread so far have said that the other ones turned out to be bullshit, but I haven't been following it that closely.