Yeah, if you look at Sorel who was a major influence for fascism, Gentile's conception of fascism, or, most prominently, the Falange in Spain and the Asserists in Germany. I guess some of it has to with romanticism of the worker.
Leftcoms/Bordigists are hardcore authoritarian. Their criticism of democratic centralism and their proposed alternative of "organic centralism" is less democratic than the Marxist-Leninist model.
It's really just the Bordigists. The German/Dutch leftcoms insisted on democracy. And the contemporary communization current mostly eschews organic centralism.
Is he actually a primmie now?
No, no he isn’t worth checking out.
Isn't that the univeralist argument though?
I don't view Camatte as currently correct, but I do see him as inevitably correct if capital is allowed to continue to the point it completely leaves the control of humans (A.I., algorithmic investmant/hedge funds, etc.)
*Blocks your path*
So wait, Camatte was a holodenier? Fuck.
Source?
Camatte and Nick Land are a funny dichotomy to each other. One sees the horrifying future of what capital might become and seeks to exit the process of technological advancement entirely to avoid it, and the other sees the same thing and want to jump right in.