Remind me how egoism is antipropertarian?
How the fuck do you not see that property rights are 'made up' in the same way the rules of cricket are made up - to allow people to coexist and cooperate without attacking each other for loot all the time?
t. anarcho monarchist pagan-objectivist egoist
Remind me how egoism is antipropertarian?
James Nelson
Other urls found in this thread:
psychologytoday.com
twitter.com
Logan Stewart
Egoism has become like anarchy, soon there will be Ego-caps and Ego-coms
Ian Myers
Because Ayn Rand didn't want people to be rationally self-interested, she wanted people to embrace narcissism and care only about themselves for its own sake.
Chase Peterson
Egoism is only """pro""" property if the person is a porky. Egoism is exactly what it says it is: egoism. The issue is that most of the populatoin belongs to the proletarian, therefore, if most of the population were egoists, private property would be abolished.
Ethan Collins
Weren't there always?
Not addressing my argument
Kayden Ramirez
I'm afraid you are confused
Mason Cox
Ayn Rand defended that if you are a prole, you should let your local porky bang your wife while you work 10 hours per day. She wasn't an egoist, she was a classcuckoldry whore.
Caleb Smith
Why would a someone support abolishing property rights if it means his right to his own property is abolished as well? Poor people with a bit of property are some of the most staunch propertarians.
Tyler Watson
Well, there is the Marxist classification of private vs personal property
Evan Thompson
I say egoism is the logical conclusion of objectivism, not the other way around. They aren't even comparable as a duality, Ayn Rand was too obsessed with dominance hierarchies and social Darwinism while Max promoted the union of egoists (that is to say mutual aid of some sorts). Even Stirner says things like the market, profit, and property binds man to arbitrary concepts which restricts his or her freedom. It prevents one from truly becoming his own. The ruling class has control over property by using force and ideology. If it is not my property then why should I even care for it? And if the landlords property ownership is detrimental to my own well being wouldn't it make since to take it as my own?
Stirner criticizes and undermines exploitation, Rand embraces it as survival of the fittest.