/OurQueen/

Greetings, Leftypol, our site is currently down for maintenance so we thought that we would drop by for a discussion with you over a hot cup of Joe.

Pic related is /ourgirl/. She stood up to industrialized censorship at the yootube HQ. Do you all, fine people agree that censorship does in fact, kill? Why or why not?

Attached: QueenYoutubeWithHer.jpg (1021x1024, 76.75K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=yw5xdEdAJ48
marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1931/dec/13.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodo_League_massacre
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_South_Korea
sputniknews.com/russia/201605091039333081-five-myths-great-patriotic-war/
youtube.com/watch?v=2m4SCUaBHS8
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

This is giving me flashbacks to the Casey Anthony trial on /b/.

We love her too m8.

Now that cuckchan is dead you have to become one of us

Attached: 1523313953051.jpg (1377x1539, 250.87K)

Unironically /ourgirl/

Attached: 1522981455141.jpg (800x500, 138.17K)

Censorship is useful. If only it were us in stead of facebook and google doing it…

Don't say that lefty bro! We hate censorship!

censorship kills, of course
that's why we're not allowed to go to town halls and read off the paid-off reptilians running councils and countries.
youtube.com/watch?v=yw5xdEdAJ48
political censorship is corruption
and we can agree that corruption kills.

fucking hell

She really nailed Nicki Minaj.


Not really relevant. Whether or not censorship kills is kind of a secondary concern - it establishes centralized authoritarian power for the state and destroys the freedom and quality of life of its subjects. It can be conducive to killing, but the fact that it's detrimental to resistance and communication is a big enough issue that it should be opposed regardless of whether or not it kills.

Nasim

IS NAZBOL

Attached: quote.png (500x464 3.01 MB, 295.88K)

benis :-DDDD

Malalai, Jean D´Arc, Nasime
Viva la Resistencia

Daily reminder that if you happily eat meat or drink milk you support institutional speciesism, which is the cousin of racism and you are also probably a fascist tbh

Attached: tumblr_oplgjdcYJl1sgqqono1_500.jpg (500x334, 34.28K)

When the Bolsheviks came to power they at first treated their enemies mildly. The Mensheviks continued to exist legally and publish their newspaper. The Socialist Revolutionaries also continued to exist legally and had their newspaper. Even the Cadets continued to publish their newspaper. When General Krasnov organized his counter-revolutionary campaign against Leningrad and fell into our hands, we could at least have kept him prisoner, according to the rules of war. Indeed, we ought to have shot him. But we released him on his "word of honor." And what happened? It soon became clear that such mildness only helped to undermine the strength of the Soviet Government. We made a mistake in displaying such mildness towards enemies of the working class. To have persisted in that mistake would have been a crime against the working class and a betrayal of its interests. That soon became guile apparent. Very soon it became evident that the milder our attitude towards our enemies, the greater their resistance. Before long the Right Socialist-Revolutionaries—Golz and others—and the Right Mensheviks were organizing in Leningrad a counter-revolutionary action of the military cadets, as a result of which many of our revolutionary sailors perished.

This very Krasnov, whom we had released on his "word of honor," organized the whiteguard Cossacks. He joined forces with Mamontov and for two years waged an armed struggle against the Soviet Government. Very soon it turned out that behind the whiteguard generals stood the agents of the western capitalist states—France, Britain, America—and also Japan. We became convinced that we had made a mistake in displaying mildness.

We learnt from experience that the only way to deal with such enemies is to apply the most ruthless policy of suppression to them.
marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1931/dec/13.htm

Well then user, why are you unconcerned about censorship. Indeed, Queen Nasim gave her life to oppose the institutional censorship of her message. She was an admirable person who discussed a wide range of topics; yet she was shunned because she did not fit the narrative. Censorship indeed kills.

Attached: Kratos.jpg (299x168 96.93 KB, 6.35K)

Tell me about the battle of Stalingrad, user. Make sure to mention when they mowed down their own troops in a hail of gun fire for being "cowards." The Bolsheviks were soulless humans who only won because of their carelessness or regard for human life.

In a way, it would be kind of cool that Communism comes to the US. All the subversive feminists and trannies would be the first at the end of the rope.

Attached: Soviets.jpg (800x540, 82.02K)

Bit too larpy.

What is this shit???
It was fucked up once so we will never risk it again and impose censorship upon all???
Censorship is/was a far worse enemy then Krasnov or Mamontov etc
Your argument is fucking exactly like Hitler´s
thats fucking brown and just red painted

it's up again go back there

I kinda like leftypol. You guys are pretty nice here. So welcoming and inclusive. Can't I stay?

Attached: America.jpg (1067x1187, 427.7K)

Only if you plan on eventually embracing socialism.

This argument in the light of the class warfare philosophical analysis just does not hold. The disregard might be only for the rich and the reactionaries. But when it comes to death toll of common people, it has to be minimized.

If anyone it is the bourgeoisie who have total disregard for human life of classes other than their own. It is called class solidarity and the bourgeoisie practice it dilligently.

How can you attribute something to malice when a misunderstanding, lack of proper information can be used as an explanation. Don't you think some officers did not stay up late into the night thinking what to do to minimize the losses of lives of proletarians? Running scenarios, lacking a proper theoretical basis for simulations, mathematical modelling and computer information processing.

During the Cold War, the soviet military turned war into mathematical equations. Modelling, using a separate line of military grade computer technology, while the civilian sector suffered from the resources taken.

Guess what the NATO states do their military calculations. In money. And they calculate on how to make war profitable, or attainable with current level of economy production. From the American documentaries, you see all the analysis being done in terms of money. Loss of life is only predicted when it comes to nuclear bombs or estimates of past losses are made.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodo_League_massacre
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_South_Korea

Case in point. The bloodthirsty commies managed to kill off at most hundreds of POWs. The peace-loving american backed forces massacred hundreds of thousands of civilians.
Think before you regurgiate the McCarthyist propaganda.

you really take your orc vs humans meme to heart, huh?

this is a quote you retard

Attached: 5da902c46d316443e074ff06d297a2ed9d4a6475.png (273x252, 107.92K)

Attached: nasimbad.png (640x545 320.72 KB, 24.44K)

sputniknews.com/russia/201605091039333081-five-myths-great-patriotic-war/

youtube.com/watch?v=2m4SCUaBHS8

I'm not talking about a video game, broseph. The Red Army shot all who didn't keep running forward. Crack a history book, buddy.

Convince me that it's better than the Oligarchical system we currently have. I'm open to ideas. The only problem is that many communists deny human nature's involvement in the form of government. Either they deny, or are silent on this. All people act in their own best interests, which is why no true communist society has ever been successful without the use of force or murder.

I am not opposed to the use of force to maintain or establish socialist society, or order generally. So that solves that problem.

But I gotta give it to you communists; Commies do not fuck around with subversives like feminists, traps, social justice warriors. They end up with the rope first. That's the first thing the Bolsheviks did when they took over Russia. Intelligencia, and human rights people were hunted down. May not be a horrible option given the current state of the United States..I think I could get in line with that, bros.

True, but "order" is subjective. Who determines what "order" is and do the people have a say in that? Marx envisioned a society with NO government, just all people acting together with no oppressor.

Me too, brother. We miss her every day.

Incorrect. Soviets had barrier troops, which had the right to shoot disobedient soldiers, but doing so was not the norm. From Catherine Merridale’s “Ivan’s War”:


Barrier troops were mainly just a mobile reserve of the worst units, because Soviet officers knew that their manpower was not unlimited. What was more common was for the NKVD to arrest retreaters, make a show of trial and executing them after the battle so that soldiers would know that they would be punished if they retreated without order.

Compared to the Kuomintang, who were in a similiar position as the Soviets (attacked and overwhelmed by their enemy), who did such measures as chaining men inside of pillboxes so that they wouldn't stop firing, the Soviets were being nice.

Here is what really happened.

She was against the Youtube Bourgeois.
Hero.

Kek, fucking ☭TANKIE☭.

Attached: pig.png (671x718, 327.21K)

Name one source that isn't a video game, nobooks.

Attached: 76c292ec411f5e2e8fac730731b70afeba6594fbb279bb67c90a7cfb90fa6acc.jpg (338x310, 32.92K)