DPRK AND ROK TO ANNOUNCE A LEGAL END TO THE WAR

China will be over the fucking moon (if youll pardon the pun). US will be pissed off because I imagine because the deal will likely involved atleast a reduced US presence.

I'm not mad. I just think the timing is kinda funny.

...

this isnt unification, just a peace treaty

THIS CANT BE HAPPENING
I NEED MY WAR

Odd question, but if those two nations achieved peace would Trump's approval rating spike? Not to say that I would mind it all, because it'd be extremely temporary, but it is a fun thing seeing democrats squirm.

I think Trumpets would see it as a bad thing tbh.

The porkies would be absolutely livid, but his supporters would love it.

DEATH TO AMERICA
HAIL KIM JONG UN

Trump on suicide watch

Now the question is 'how will porkies block the spread of ideas by juche missionaries in the enslaved world?'

I wish this had occurred another way.
Nuclear proliferation is bad for porky but also bad for humanity.

Oh fuck Bolton is going to shag this, isn't he?

John Bolton is a fucking bitch, Trump's already looking at firing him because he's getting a bit too popular with his crowd for Trump's liking.

No! Anything but my eternal war! Anything!
I'll give you some benefits and some safety-nets, too. No, not unions. Don't be crazy. A 0,5% raise over the next five years, you've got it. I'm being generous, just don't touch my perpetual threat.

Attached: 7a5bbecdc8908d6f1e70da548e3720e1c80ae008.png (1104x1336, 1.12M)

Go home pink man! Go home!

GO HOME!

KOREAN

UNIFICATION

This is cool, but on whose terms is this gonna be? I know south Korea has been facing political corruption issues lately, but they still have the backing p.s. a fairly strong west and for all we know the DPRK could just be caving in to them

I bet libtard snowflakes are gonna deny Trumpf bringing peace to Korea and preventing Kim from nuking everyone

Attached: not-my-president-lol-not-my-resident-13773061.png (500x522, 113.75K)

*of a fairly strong west

North Korea will never end the war with the United States, if that's what you're asking.

However, this could mean that resources find their way to North Korea, far more easily. Which is good.

Trump didn't bring peace to korea. He got used by kim. Probably libs will say that it's the only thing trump did right except bombing assad

ABSOLUTE MADMAN

Attached: kim.jpg (192x192, 13.86K)

Ok so let me get this straight

You think the John Bolton Administration is going to be happy about this? Are you some kind of special ed retard?

Wouldn't this be good for the US because it potentially puts the DPRK under greater influence from the RoK?

Ok, but still people are acting like this means dprk unification of Korea when we don't even know the terms yet

North Korea isn't going to end the war with the United States because its very existence is because of a genocidal war the United States waged. There would have been a single Korea, and not a split Korea, were it not for the US. The US killed millions and millions of Koreans through a hellish campaign of carpet bombing them into economic and structural oblivion with the goal of literally exterminating every last North Korean

And central to North Korea's culture, is this fact.

North Korea, will never end the war with the United States. It may be less hostile, that's REMOTELY possible. But it will never end the war.

Now with that said, the terms of the agreement probably mean a complete reduction of troops at either boarder and more peace talks in the future, bringing us to a Pre-George W. Bush Jr./Clinton Era relations period in between the Korean states

Which is good, that's fantastic news actually.

I meant
*Clinton Era/Pre-George W. Bush Jr Era

CHAD KIM JONG UN JUST DID IT

Not really, any reunification would require reducing US influence. Also there is the possibility of jncreasing a leftist presence im the South: just like how reunification in Germany created leftwing loyalties kn the Saarland. However this time it will be far better managed and could long term set Korea towards a unified socialist state.

goddamn you aspies the ancom was obviously sarcastic

Issa joke

Conservatards believe that DPRK only gets diplomatic shit done whenever a Republican is president because they think that Democrats allowed them to have nukes, even though Clinton and Carter were involved in diplomacy with North Korea while Dubya screwed it all over

I am really fucking glad for the koreans to be honest.

What's the chance that this would actually help the Republicans and Trump in general? I'm not talking about the porkies who love war, I know what they are thinking but I can't make heads or tails if the Republicans would get a popularity boost or not from this.

In b4 crypto-liberals whining muh hereditary totalitarian fascist monarchy

Sourcing does seem a bit dodgy though, just one SK publication and an unnamed official.

Attached: 90a2e40f6c464f167f911e9f76720c9a69cd90a21845a1630c473e382d492f23.jpg (3243x2432, 358.3K)

It is a hereditary monarchy though.
But peace is beneficial for all of the Korean peoples.

Either way, Kim Jong Un did nothin wrong.

someone should explain me why an hereditary monarchy is bad on materialist basis, because it's not.

These memes have certainly aged well. Share them while you still can

Attached: 5c18517cc23dcd8ce87348c352417d460421120ddce69143ac5a8d7b200b352d_1.jpg (900x1200 131.4 KB, 190.24K)

Someone should also explain how korea is a monarchy

It's not.

Attached: not a monarchy.png (1080x1971, 2.4M)

That's it,
Time to nuke Korea until it glows.
And the Japs again, because you never know.
Hell, we should just nuke all of Asia and call it a day.

Attached: bolton glasses.jpg (1484x1126, 262.69K)

lmao
I wonder if the japanese would grow a pair and stop riding burger dick if they actually got nuked a third time.

All three rules have been father son. Thats the definition of a monarchy.

Attached: thonking.png (128x128, 10.64K)

No they fucking don't

Kim is not the owner of the country, stupid nigger.

Yeah and it didnt require American imperialism. Learn a lesson you fat fuckers, stay out of country's business and let them figure their own shit out. Concentrate on making sure people who work 2 jobs can support a family in your country, or not having healthcare cost the price of a new car.

At that point you should have already noticed that noone besides Kim Il Sung was head of the state

uhhuh

Neither does a king, you illiterate moron.

Attached: DRnwI6gUQAAwkKX.jpg (401x669, 21.21K)

You just proved my point, dickhead.

A class system doesn't mean "litterally owns everything".

Hi BO

If you don't support American Imperialism and this thread is about Peace between North and South Korea as a topic, why are you arguing over North Korea's flaws randomly? It gives context to your argument you moron

Attached: a379e90193f9ae6b87740a72f5ca413bef6fbaf4f587a66da4c066e8c0dcc5c4.png (999x815, 358.42K)

I didn't, this retard started randomly ranting about if north korea is a monarchy or not, I just responded.

America is not going to be happy about this.

This tbh, even if you think SK was sent from god you should be celebrating this.

Good, fuck them.

I agree with the sentiment but a pissed off America with John Bolton at the helm is not a good look

umm sweetie, the hereditary principle is the soul of revolution. not only does genetics assure a degree of mental continuity as programmed in our dna, so the upbringing of a son can pass the traits of the father to the son and thereby enshrine the revolution permanently. kinda how the Bonapartist monarchy enshrined liberal principles of the french revolution (while draining it admittedly of most of the jacobin content), so the Kim dynasty embodies the socialist principle

Kim Jong Un isn't the fucking head of state. Kim Yong Nam (from another Kim family) has occupied that role since 1998.

Attached: dprk heads of state.png (846x1130 25.11 KB, 137.04K)

*since 99

how do we know kim isn't just going to end up "liberalizing" the DPRK into another China, a country with suicide nets in every factory, hookers in every alley, and having among the worst rates of income inequality in the world? revolutionaries must always remain vigilant, skeptical, and demanding

Attached: 413CFA6800000578-4585230-image-a-240_1496936881649.jpg (962x648, 115.02K)

That would require peace talks with the US

They will perhaps stop being as openly hostile, but if you think that's liberalism, then you're insane because that was the DPRK's position, even helped by the fucking Clinton era, until big boy George W fucked it all up

We are not going into a dark time, we are in fact, returning to past norms

I don't think that could happen. China got industrialized quite a bit before capitalization, allowing the ruling pigs to maintain their power through private property and state control. NK is not industrialized enough, its reversal to capitalism would not allow the survival of the ruling party, resulting in a south korean annexation of the north, who will not respect any private property claims of the old regime. For this to happen like in china, it first has to industrialize.

But with this peace opening up potential foreign trade and investment, it could happen more easily.

TRUMP: PEACE WILL NOT HAPPEN BETWEEN THE TWO NATIONS IF THE US ISN'T INVOLVED

Attached: DbAhGsCWsAAMzTd.jpg (750x1012, 89.66K)

BUMP

This has John Bolton and Trump's hand writing written all fucking over it. Pieces of worthless shit

Lads, SK will pick peace over the US. Trump just sank its alliance.

Excluding the US should be one of Kim's preconditions.

>Without us, and without me in particlar

🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄

Can someone just end this guy already, he's literally becoming a fucking threat to global peace talks

Fuck him, get his ass Americans. Just someone fucking break his legs with a base ball bat I don't care, something. He's risking peace for his own fucking ego and John Bolton's blood lust

Who the fuck does this bitch ass fat ass think he is

No I actually like him. He does the same hilary would do, except he is retarded enough to openly flaunt that america is a threat to the world.

nigga leave the board right now you disgust me

Attached: 15791f99ba4f9d07bb5e31ee0b35c6ba3745b97f08745e38c103ed8c21c4cc22.gif (200x150, 80.91K)

It's like a child complaining he can't sit at the grown-ups' table.

Yeah, but the world is just going to roll over, it already knew that. It doesn't need more fucking reminders at this point.

Hope someone makes Trump eat lead soon

Literally at this point, fuck Trump unironically to the strongest possible degree

I think he's trying to take credit for them talking, not demanding to be the center-piece of the negotiations.

I would rather have a fucking democrat then Trump, this arrogant bitch tits boy needs to have his ego humiliated, I'm sick of him fucking compromising Korean peace talks. I don't care if it means a Democrat gets elected who does the same thing, just deserts he won't have his name on terrible shit that he wants to have his name all over. I don't want him to even have his name on it

Attached: DaCC9gRX0AE1bs7.jpg (725x725, 126.13K)

Oh, I read somewhere else he was

Attached: DbAhGr-XUAABzRf.jpg (750x1012 51.36 KB, 89.66K)

Youre implying whoever gets put in power isnt a continuation of the bush line of foreign policy.
Obama didnt stop any of what bush started. Guantanamo is still open, the wars rage on, more nukes were made, etc etc. Clinton would do even more shit like this, like she did in libya, except cause less international incidents.

And it does help in a sense. People who used to believe in strongmanism rightism are now shown that electing an "outsider candidate" who is "politically incorrect" doesnt change a fucking thing and americans are all shown how fucked the political system is and that democracy isnt real, that peace and progress cannot be achieved through voting.

and even touching on that, the policy existed long before Bush

And? I'll hate them just as much as I hate this bastard.

Nobody is making me say Trump isn't the highest most deadly form of cancer that ever existed. He is. He's the US president, but there's something about Trump that makes me fucking loathe the idea he enjoys taking credit for global peace talks, and might even threaten them with his idiot advisors

No, I don't care who replaces them. I'm not going to ever play favorites with US presidents, I'd become anorexic from vomiting so much at the mere fucking idea

If you hate them all as much as this bastard why do you call for someone to specifically shoot this guy?

Kim won't end up liberalizing
right?
I hope not

Bush made it worse you absolute fucking fool. Bush made it just as bad as where it was since the 50's and 60's

I'm sick of all your "well look at the bright side!" shit

You hideously dumb bitch, there is no fucking bright side. I think I'm going to call people who post this shit "Bright Side" posters because they always pop up and their argumentation always smells like a polluted public restroom. There is never a fucking "bright side" in the 21st century.

Quit holding Trump on the "dumb lovable dog who does not know what he does" pedestal, it's fucking repulsive

Why would you want someone who threatens world peace dead HMMMMMMMMMM that's a real tough one.

I guess it's right to just give him what wants, head down ass up, and call the ass fucking "a good learning experience for the world"

Because that's all you ever post about